Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | por |
Published: |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
2014
|
Online Access: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
rev-pab-br-article-15487 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
rev-pab-br-article-154872014-04-16T19:18:59Z Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses Tipos de comedouros para suínos e efeito da forma física de rações sobre suas perdas Bellaver, Cláudio Konzen, Egidio A. Santos, Dalton L. Freitas, Alfredo R. management; feed waste; equipments; feed/gain ratio; ration meal; ration pelleting manejo; desperdício; equipamentos; conversão alimentar; peletilização; ração farelada This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively. Este experimento foi conduzido durante o mês de outubro de 1982, tendo como objetivo a comparação de comedouros tipo EMBRAPA (C1) e convencional (C2), bem como a comparação de duas formas físicas de ração, peletizada (R1) e farelada (R2). O delineamento experimental foi o inteiramente casualizado, com estrutura fatorial 2 x 2. A unidade experimental foi representada pela perda de ração na baia, durante o dia. Os animais utilizados pesavam, em média, 77,48 ± 0,48 kg no início do experimento, e foram mantidos em baias de piso totalmente ripado. Foi constatada interação estatisticamente significativa (P<0,01) entre tipos de comedouros e forma física de ração. Dentro de C1 e C2, a R2 apresentou perda de ração significativamente maior (P<0,01) do que R1, embora, proporcionalmente menor em C2. A perda percentual de ração foi de 1,37 ±0,58 e 0,99% ± 0,22, para os comedouros C1 e C2, respectivamente. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2014-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487 Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, n.3, mar. 1984; 375-378 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, n.3, mar. 1984; 375-378 1678-3921 0100-104x por https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487/9428 |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-pab-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA |
language |
por |
format |
Digital |
author |
Bellaver, Cláudio Konzen, Egidio A. Santos, Dalton L. Freitas, Alfredo R. |
spellingShingle |
Bellaver, Cláudio Konzen, Egidio A. Santos, Dalton L. Freitas, Alfredo R. Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
author_facet |
Bellaver, Cláudio Konzen, Egidio A. Santos, Dalton L. Freitas, Alfredo R. |
author_sort |
Bellaver, Cláudio |
title |
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
title_short |
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
title_full |
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
title_fullStr |
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
title_sort |
feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses |
description |
This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively. |
publisher |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bellaverclaudio feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses AT konzenegidioa feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses AT santosdaltonl feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses AT freitasalfredor feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses AT bellaverclaudio tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas AT konzenegidioa tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas AT santosdaltonl tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas AT freitasalfredor tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas |
_version_ |
1813449947384643584 |