Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses

This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bellaver, Cláudio, Konzen, Egidio A., Santos, Dalton L., Freitas, Alfredo R.
Format: Digital revista
Language:por
Published: Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 2014
Online Access:https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id rev-pab-br-article-15487
record_format ojs
spelling rev-pab-br-article-154872014-04-16T19:18:59Z Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses Tipos de comedouros para suínos e efeito da forma física de rações sobre suas perdas Bellaver, Cláudio Konzen, Egidio A. Santos, Dalton L. Freitas, Alfredo R. management; feed waste; equipments; feed/gain ratio; ration meal; ration pelleting manejo; desperdício; equipamentos; conversão alimentar; peletilização; ração farelada This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively. Este experimento foi conduzido durante o mês de outubro de 1982, tendo como objetivo a comparação de comedouros tipo EMBRAPA (C1) e convencional (C2), bem como a comparação de duas formas físicas de ração, peletizada (R1) e farelada (R2). O delineamento experimental foi o inteiramente casualizado, com estrutura fatorial 2 x 2. A unidade experimental foi representada pela perda de ração na baia, durante o dia. Os animais utilizados pesavam, em média, 77,48 ± 0,48 kg no início do experimento, e foram mantidos em baias de piso totalmente ripado. Foi constatada interação estatisticamente significativa (P<0,01) entre tipos de comedouros e forma física de ração. Dentro de C1 e C2, a R2 apresentou perda de ração significativamente maior (P<0,01) do que R1, embora, proporcionalmente menor em C2. A perda percentual de ração foi de 1,37 ±0,58 e 0,99% ± 0,22, para os comedouros C1 e C2, respectivamente. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2014-04-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487 Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, n.3, mar. 1984; 375-378 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, n.3, mar. 1984; 375-378 1678-3921 0100-104x por https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487/9428
institution EMBRAPA
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-pab-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language por
format Digital
author Bellaver, Cláudio
Konzen, Egidio A.
Santos, Dalton L.
Freitas, Alfredo R.
spellingShingle Bellaver, Cláudio
Konzen, Egidio A.
Santos, Dalton L.
Freitas, Alfredo R.
Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
author_facet Bellaver, Cláudio
Konzen, Egidio A.
Santos, Dalton L.
Freitas, Alfredo R.
author_sort Bellaver, Cláudio
title Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
title_short Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
title_full Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
title_fullStr Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
title_full_unstemmed Feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
title_sort feeders and rations forms for swine, upon ration losses
description This experiment was carried out with the objective of comparing EMBRAPA’s prototype feeders (C1) and conventional feeders (C2), as well as two physical forms of rations, pelleted (R1) and meal (R2). The experimental design was the entirely randomized, with factorial structure 2 x 2 and with the experimental unit represented by the ration losses/pen/day. The utilized animals weighted 77.48 ± 0.48 kg, and the pens were of entirely stripped floor. An interaction statistically significant (P<0.01) was found among feeders and rations. Between C1 and C2 , R2 showed significantly (P<0.01) higher ration losses than R1 although proportionaly smaller for C2. The percentual loss of rations was 1.37 ± 0.58 and 0.99 ±0.22 for feeders C1 and C2, respectively.
publisher Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
publishDate 2014
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15487
work_keys_str_mv AT bellaverclaudio feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses
AT konzenegidioa feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses
AT santosdaltonl feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses
AT freitasalfredor feedersandrationsformsforswineuponrationlosses
AT bellaverclaudio tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas
AT konzenegidioa tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas
AT santosdaltonl tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas
AT freitasalfredor tiposdecomedourosparasuinoseefeitodaformafisicaderacoessobresuasperdas
_version_ 1813449947384643584