Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes

Abstract Introduction and objectives Multimodal Analgesia (MMA) has shown promising results in postoperative outcomes across a broad spectrum of surgeries, including bariatric surgery. We compared the analgesic effect immediately after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery (LBS) of the combined effect of MMA and methadone against two techniques that were based mainly on the use of high-potency medium-acting opioids. Methods Two hundred seventy-one patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score > 3/10 measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) during the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay. The three protocols of intraoperative analgesia were: (P1) sufentanil at anesthetic induction followed by remifentanil infusion; (P2) sufentanil at induction followed by dexmedetomidine infusion; and (P3) remifentanil at induction followed by MMA including dexmedetomidine, magnesium, lidocaine, and methadone. Only P1 and P2 patients received morphine toward the end of surgery. Poisson regression was used to adjust confounding factors and calculate Prevalence Ratio (PR). Results Postoperative VNS > 3 was recorded in 135 (49.81%) patients, of which 93 (68.89%) were subjected to P1, 25 (18.56%) to P2, and 17 (12.59%) to P3. In the final adjusted model, both anesthetic techniques (P3) (PR = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03-0.28]), and (P2) (PR = 0.42%; 95% CI [0.20-0.90]) were associated with lower occurrence of VNS > 3, whereas age range 20-29 was associated to higher occurrence of VNS > 3 (PR = 3.21; 95% CI [1.22-8.44]) in PACU. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) was distributed as follows: (P1) 20.3%, (P2) 31.25% and (P3) 6.77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p< 0.05). Intraoperative hypotension occurred more often in P3 (39%) compared to P2 (20.31%) and P1 (17.46%) (p< 0.05). Conclusion MMA + methadone was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and lower incidence of moderate/severe pain in PACU after LBS.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silva,Leopoldo Muniz da, Ho,Anthony M.H., Oliveira,Daniel Rodrigues de, Abib,Arthur de Campos Vieira, Silveira,Saullo Queiroz, Aranha,Anna Beatriz, André,Vitor Oliveira, Pinto,Patrícia Rennó, Nersessian,Rafael Souza Fava, Mizubuti,Glenio B.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000500560
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2352-22912022000500560
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2352-229120220005005602022-12-16Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomesSilva,Leopoldo Muniz daHo,Anthony M.H.Oliveira,Daniel Rodrigues deAbib,Arthur de Campos VieiraSilveira,Saullo QueirozAranha,Anna BeatrizAndré,Vitor OliveiraPinto,Patrícia RennóNersessian,Rafael Souza FavaMizubuti,Glenio B. Bariatric surgery Laparoscopy Multimodal analgesia Perioperative analgesia Postoperative pain Abstract Introduction and objectives Multimodal Analgesia (MMA) has shown promising results in postoperative outcomes across a broad spectrum of surgeries, including bariatric surgery. We compared the analgesic effect immediately after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery (LBS) of the combined effect of MMA and methadone against two techniques that were based mainly on the use of high-potency medium-acting opioids. Methods Two hundred seventy-one patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score > 3/10 measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) during the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay. The three protocols of intraoperative analgesia were: (P1) sufentanil at anesthetic induction followed by remifentanil infusion; (P2) sufentanil at induction followed by dexmedetomidine infusion; and (P3) remifentanil at induction followed by MMA including dexmedetomidine, magnesium, lidocaine, and methadone. Only P1 and P2 patients received morphine toward the end of surgery. Poisson regression was used to adjust confounding factors and calculate Prevalence Ratio (PR). Results Postoperative VNS > 3 was recorded in 135 (49.81%) patients, of which 93 (68.89%) were subjected to P1, 25 (18.56%) to P2, and 17 (12.59%) to P3. In the final adjusted model, both anesthetic techniques (P3) (PR = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03-0.28]), and (P2) (PR = 0.42%; 95% CI [0.20-0.90]) were associated with lower occurrence of VNS > 3, whereas age range 20-29 was associated to higher occurrence of VNS > 3 (PR = 3.21; 95% CI [1.22-8.44]) in PACU. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) was distributed as follows: (P1) 20.3%, (P2) 31.25% and (P3) 6.77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p< 0.05). Intraoperative hypotension occurred more often in P3 (39%) compared to P2 (20.31%) and P1 (17.46%) (p< 0.05). Conclusion MMA + methadone was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and lower incidence of moderate/severe pain in PACU after LBS.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology v.72 n.5 20222022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000500560en10.1016/j.bjane.2021.06.006
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Silva,Leopoldo Muniz da
Ho,Anthony M.H.
Oliveira,Daniel Rodrigues de
Abib,Arthur de Campos Vieira
Silveira,Saullo Queiroz
Aranha,Anna Beatriz
André,Vitor Oliveira
Pinto,Patrícia Rennó
Nersessian,Rafael Souza Fava
Mizubuti,Glenio B.
spellingShingle Silva,Leopoldo Muniz da
Ho,Anthony M.H.
Oliveira,Daniel Rodrigues de
Abib,Arthur de Campos Vieira
Silveira,Saullo Queiroz
Aranha,Anna Beatriz
André,Vitor Oliveira
Pinto,Patrícia Rennó
Nersessian,Rafael Souza Fava
Mizubuti,Glenio B.
Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
author_facet Silva,Leopoldo Muniz da
Ho,Anthony M.H.
Oliveira,Daniel Rodrigues de
Abib,Arthur de Campos Vieira
Silveira,Saullo Queiroz
Aranha,Anna Beatriz
André,Vitor Oliveira
Pinto,Patrícia Rennó
Nersessian,Rafael Souza Fava
Mizubuti,Glenio B.
author_sort Silva,Leopoldo Muniz da
title Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
title_short Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
title_full Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
title_fullStr Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
title_sort comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes
description Abstract Introduction and objectives Multimodal Analgesia (MMA) has shown promising results in postoperative outcomes across a broad spectrum of surgeries, including bariatric surgery. We compared the analgesic effect immediately after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery (LBS) of the combined effect of MMA and methadone against two techniques that were based mainly on the use of high-potency medium-acting opioids. Methods Two hundred seventy-one patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score > 3/10 measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) during the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay. The three protocols of intraoperative analgesia were: (P1) sufentanil at anesthetic induction followed by remifentanil infusion; (P2) sufentanil at induction followed by dexmedetomidine infusion; and (P3) remifentanil at induction followed by MMA including dexmedetomidine, magnesium, lidocaine, and methadone. Only P1 and P2 patients received morphine toward the end of surgery. Poisson regression was used to adjust confounding factors and calculate Prevalence Ratio (PR). Results Postoperative VNS > 3 was recorded in 135 (49.81%) patients, of which 93 (68.89%) were subjected to P1, 25 (18.56%) to P2, and 17 (12.59%) to P3. In the final adjusted model, both anesthetic techniques (P3) (PR = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03-0.28]), and (P2) (PR = 0.42%; 95% CI [0.20-0.90]) were associated with lower occurrence of VNS > 3, whereas age range 20-29 was associated to higher occurrence of VNS > 3 (PR = 3.21; 95% CI [1.22-8.44]) in PACU. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) was distributed as follows: (P1) 20.3%, (P2) 31.25% and (P3) 6.77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p< 0.05). Intraoperative hypotension occurred more often in P3 (39%) compared to P2 (20.31%) and P1 (17.46%) (p< 0.05). Conclusion MMA + methadone was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and lower incidence of moderate/severe pain in PACU after LBS.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000500560
work_keys_str_mv AT silvaleopoldomunizda comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT hoanthonymh comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT oliveiradanielrodriguesde comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT abibarthurdecamposvieira comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT silveirasaulloqueiroz comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT aranhaannabeatriz comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT andrevitoroliveira comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT pintopatriciarenno comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT nersessianrafaelsouzafava comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
AT mizubutigleniob comparisonofthreeintraoperativeanalgesicstrategiesinlaparoscopicbariatricsurgeryaretrospectivestudyofimmediatepostoperativeoutcomes
_version_ 1756472287456919552