Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz
Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária
2013
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1984-29612013000400495 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1984-296120130004004952015-11-24Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitrazSantos,Tânia Regina BettinKlafke,Guilherme MarcondesPappen,Felipe GeraldoNizoli,Leandro QuintanaBiegelmeyer,PatríciaFarias,Nara Amélia Rosa Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus amitraz bioassays resistance diagnosis Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia VeterináriaRevista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária v.22 n.4 20132013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495en10.1590/S1984-29612013000400008 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa |
spellingShingle |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
author_facet |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin Klafke,Guilherme Marcondes Pappen,Felipe Geraldo Nizoli,Leandro Quintana Biegelmeyer,Patrícia Farias,Nara Amélia Rosa |
author_sort |
Santos,Tânia Regina Bettin |
title |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_short |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_full |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
title_sort |
comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus to amitraz |
description |
Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 µg/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT. |
publisher |
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612013000400495 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT santostaniareginabettin comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz AT klafkeguilhermemarcondes comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz AT pappenfelipegeraldo comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz AT nizolileandroquintana comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz AT biegelmeyerpatricia comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz AT fariasnaraameliarosa comparisonofthreelarvalbioassaystoevaluatesusceptibilityofrhipicephalusboophilusmicroplustoamitraz |
_version_ |
1756437074501697536 |