High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies

OBJECTIVE: To compare high-fidelity simulation with case-based discussion for teaching medical students about pediatric emergencies, as assessed by a knowledge post-test, a knowledge retention test and a survey of satisfaction with the method. METHODS: This was a non-randomized controlled study using a crossover design for the methods, as well as multiple-choice questionnaire tests and a satisfaction survey. Final-year medical students were allocated into two groups: group 1 participated in an anaphylaxis simulation and a discussion of a supraventricular tachycardia case, and conversely, group 2 participated in a discussion of an anaphylaxis case and a supraventricular tachycardia simulation. Students were tested on each theme at the end of their rotation (post-test) and 4-6 months later (retention test). RESULTS: Most students (108, or 66.3%) completed all of the tests. The mean scores for simulation versus case-based discussion were respectively 43.6% versus 46.6% for the anaphylaxis pre-test (p =0.42), 63.5% versus 67.8% for the post-test (p =0.13) and 61.5% versus 65.5% for the retention test (p =0.19). Additionally, the mean scores were respectively 33.9% versus 31.6% for the supraventricular tachycardia pre-test (p =0.44), 42.5% versus 47.7% for the post-test (p =0.09) and 41.5% versus 39.5% for the retention test (p =0.47). For both themes, there was improvement between the pre-test and the post-test (p <0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the post-test and the retention test (p >0.05). Moreover, the satisfaction survey revealed a preference for simulation (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: As a single intervention, simulation is not significantly different from case-based discussion in terms of acquisition and retention of knowledge but is superior in terms of student satisfaction.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Couto,Thomaz Bittencourt, Farhat,Sylvia C.L., Geis,Gary L., Olsen,Orjan, Schvartsman,Claudio
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322015000600393
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-59322015000600393
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-593220150006003932015-12-21High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergenciesCouto,Thomaz BittencourtFarhat,Sylvia C.L.Geis,Gary L.Olsen,OrjanSchvartsman,Claudio Patient Simulation Problem-Based Learning Medical Education Undergraduate Education Pediatrics Comparative Study OBJECTIVE: To compare high-fidelity simulation with case-based discussion for teaching medical students about pediatric emergencies, as assessed by a knowledge post-test, a knowledge retention test and a survey of satisfaction with the method. METHODS: This was a non-randomized controlled study using a crossover design for the methods, as well as multiple-choice questionnaire tests and a satisfaction survey. Final-year medical students were allocated into two groups: group 1 participated in an anaphylaxis simulation and a discussion of a supraventricular tachycardia case, and conversely, group 2 participated in a discussion of an anaphylaxis case and a supraventricular tachycardia simulation. Students were tested on each theme at the end of their rotation (post-test) and 4-6 months later (retention test). RESULTS: Most students (108, or 66.3%) completed all of the tests. The mean scores for simulation versus case-based discussion were respectively 43.6% versus 46.6% for the anaphylaxis pre-test (p =0.42), 63.5% versus 67.8% for the post-test (p =0.13) and 61.5% versus 65.5% for the retention test (p =0.19). Additionally, the mean scores were respectively 33.9% versus 31.6% for the supraventricular tachycardia pre-test (p =0.44), 42.5% versus 47.7% for the post-test (p =0.09) and 41.5% versus 39.5% for the retention test (p =0.47). For both themes, there was improvement between the pre-test and the post-test (p <0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the post-test and the retention test (p >0.05). Moreover, the satisfaction survey revealed a preference for simulation (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: As a single intervention, simulation is not significantly different from case-based discussion in terms of acquisition and retention of knowledge but is superior in terms of student satisfaction.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.70 n.6 20152015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322015000600393en10.6061/clinics/2015(06)02
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Couto,Thomaz Bittencourt
Farhat,Sylvia C.L.
Geis,Gary L.
Olsen,Orjan
Schvartsman,Claudio
spellingShingle Couto,Thomaz Bittencourt
Farhat,Sylvia C.L.
Geis,Gary L.
Olsen,Orjan
Schvartsman,Claudio
High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
author_facet Couto,Thomaz Bittencourt
Farhat,Sylvia C.L.
Geis,Gary L.
Olsen,Orjan
Schvartsman,Claudio
author_sort Couto,Thomaz Bittencourt
title High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
title_short High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
title_full High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
title_fullStr High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
title_full_unstemmed High-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in Brazil about pediatric emergencies
title_sort high-fidelity simulation versus case-based discussion for teaching medical students in brazil about pediatric emergencies
description OBJECTIVE: To compare high-fidelity simulation with case-based discussion for teaching medical students about pediatric emergencies, as assessed by a knowledge post-test, a knowledge retention test and a survey of satisfaction with the method. METHODS: This was a non-randomized controlled study using a crossover design for the methods, as well as multiple-choice questionnaire tests and a satisfaction survey. Final-year medical students were allocated into two groups: group 1 participated in an anaphylaxis simulation and a discussion of a supraventricular tachycardia case, and conversely, group 2 participated in a discussion of an anaphylaxis case and a supraventricular tachycardia simulation. Students were tested on each theme at the end of their rotation (post-test) and 4-6 months later (retention test). RESULTS: Most students (108, or 66.3%) completed all of the tests. The mean scores for simulation versus case-based discussion were respectively 43.6% versus 46.6% for the anaphylaxis pre-test (p =0.42), 63.5% versus 67.8% for the post-test (p =0.13) and 61.5% versus 65.5% for the retention test (p =0.19). Additionally, the mean scores were respectively 33.9% versus 31.6% for the supraventricular tachycardia pre-test (p =0.44), 42.5% versus 47.7% for the post-test (p =0.09) and 41.5% versus 39.5% for the retention test (p =0.47). For both themes, there was improvement between the pre-test and the post-test (p <0.05), and no significant difference was observed between the post-test and the retention test (p >0.05). Moreover, the satisfaction survey revealed a preference for simulation (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: As a single intervention, simulation is not significantly different from case-based discussion in terms of acquisition and retention of knowledge but is superior in terms of student satisfaction.
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322015000600393
work_keys_str_mv AT coutothomazbittencourt highfidelitysimulationversuscasebaseddiscussionforteachingmedicalstudentsinbrazilaboutpediatricemergencies
AT farhatsylviacl highfidelitysimulationversuscasebaseddiscussionforteachingmedicalstudentsinbrazilaboutpediatricemergencies
AT geisgaryl highfidelitysimulationversuscasebaseddiscussionforteachingmedicalstudentsinbrazilaboutpediatricemergencies
AT olsenorjan highfidelitysimulationversuscasebaseddiscussionforteachingmedicalstudentsinbrazilaboutpediatricemergencies
AT schvartsmanclaudio highfidelitysimulationversuscasebaseddiscussionforteachingmedicalstudentsinbrazilaboutpediatricemergencies
_version_ 1756432258104819712