Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth, Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro, Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos, Granja Porto,Gabriela
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Medicina Oral 2006
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1698-69462006000500011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1698-694620060005000112007-11-02Glove perforation during oral surgical proceduresLopes de Freitas Xavier,RuthCavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,BelmiroFerreira da Silva,Luiz CarlosGranja Porto,Gabriela Surgical gloves surgery oral Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb.Sociedad Española de Medicina OralMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (Internet) v.11 n.5 20062006-09-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth
Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro
Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos
Granja Porto,Gabriela
spellingShingle Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth
Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro
Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos
Granja Porto,Gabriela
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
author_facet Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth
Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro
Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos
Granja Porto,Gabriela
author_sort Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth
title Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
title_short Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
title_full Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
title_fullStr Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
title_full_unstemmed Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
title_sort glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
description Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb.
publisher Sociedad Española de Medicina Oral
publishDate 2006
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesdefreitasxavierruth gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures
AT cavalcantidoegitovasconcelosbelmiro gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures
AT ferreiradasilvaluizcarlos gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures
AT granjaportogabriela gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures
_version_ 1755940902922092544