Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedad Española de Medicina Oral
2006
|
Online Access: | http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1698-69462006000500011 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1698-694620060005000112007-11-02Glove perforation during oral surgical proceduresLopes de Freitas Xavier,RuthCavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,BelmiroFerreira da Silva,Luiz CarlosGranja Porto,Gabriela Surgical gloves surgery oral Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb.Sociedad Española de Medicina OralMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal (Internet) v.11 n.5 20062006-09-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-es |
tag |
revista |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos Granja Porto,Gabriela |
spellingShingle |
Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos Granja Porto,Gabriela Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
author_facet |
Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos,Belmiro Ferreira da Silva,Luiz Carlos Granja Porto,Gabriela |
author_sort |
Lopes de Freitas Xavier,Ruth |
title |
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
title_short |
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
title_full |
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
title_fullStr |
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
title_sort |
glove perforation during oral surgical procedures |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of glove perforation among undergraduates and residents performing maxillofacial surgery and identify procedures associated with the perforations. Study Design: For this purpose, 200 pairs of surgical gloves were used. For inspecting the perforations, the gloves were filled with water, at least 500 ml. Results: Sixteen gloves (8%) were perforated, 8 (4%) by residents and 8 (4%) by undergraduate students. Only the residents noticed that 2 gloves (1%) were perforated and identified the object causing the perforation. The left hand was the more affected with 9 perforations (4.5%). The finger pulp was the region most affected with 12 perforations (6%). The perforated forefinger appeared in 8 gloves (4%), representing the highest incidence of perforations. Conclusion: We concluded there was no difference in surgical glove perforation between undergraduate students and residents, the incidence of perforations was greater in the left hand (nondominant hand) and the fingers in which most perforations occurred were the forefinger and the thumb. |
publisher |
Sociedad Española de Medicina Oral |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1698-69462006000500011 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lopesdefreitasxavierruth gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures AT cavalcantidoegitovasconcelosbelmiro gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures AT ferreiradasilvaluizcarlos gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures AT granjaportogabriela gloveperforationduringoralsurgicalprocedures |
_version_ |
1755940902922092544 |