Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis

ABSTRACT Purpose to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. Results Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). Conclusion According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oguz,Ural, Takci,Zennure, Oguz,Isil Deniz, Resorlu,Berkan, Balta,Ilknur, Unsal,Ali
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300571
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382016000300571
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820160003005712016-06-28Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasisOguz,UralTakci,ZennureOguz,Isil DenizResorlu,BerkanBalta,IlknurUnsal,Ali Lichen Planus, Oral Urolithiasis Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous Metabolic Diseases ABSTRACT Purpose to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. Results Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). Conclusion According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.42 n.3 20162016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300571en10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0364
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Oguz,Ural
Takci,Zennure
Oguz,Isil Deniz
Resorlu,Berkan
Balta,Ilknur
Unsal,Ali
spellingShingle Oguz,Ural
Takci,Zennure
Oguz,Isil Deniz
Resorlu,Berkan
Balta,Ilknur
Unsal,Ali
Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
author_facet Oguz,Ural
Takci,Zennure
Oguz,Isil Deniz
Resorlu,Berkan
Balta,Ilknur
Unsal,Ali
author_sort Oguz,Ural
title Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_short Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_full Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_fullStr Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? Lichen planus and urolithiasis
title_sort are patients with lichen planus really prone to urolithiasis? lichen planus and urolithiasis
description ABSTRACT Purpose to investigate whether patients with lichen planus (LP) are really prone to urolithiasis or not. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective analysis of 40 patients diagnosed with lichen planus (LP) (group I), and 40 volunteers did not have LP before (group II). Participants were all checked for urolithiasis by radiological investigations. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemistry parameters including calcium and uric acid. 24-h urine samples were analyzed to investigate oxalate, citrate calcium, uric acid, magnesium, sodium and creatinine. Results Men/women ratio and mean age were similar between group I and II (p>0.05). A presence or history of urolithiasis was detected in 8 (20%) and 2 (%5) patients in group I and II, respectively (p<0.05). Hypocitraturia was the most common anomaly with 35% (n:14) in group I. The rate of hypocitraturia in group II was 12.5% (n:5) and the difference was statistically significantly different (p=0.036). In group I, hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria followed with rates of 27.5% (n:11) and 25% (n:10), respectively. The rate of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria were both 5% (n:2) in group II and the differences were significant (p<0.05). Hyperuricemia was another important finding in the patients with LP. It was detected in 13 (32.5%) patients in group I and in 1 (2.5%) participant in group II (p=0.001). Conclusion According to our results, metabolic disorders of urolithiasis were highly detected in the patients with LP. However, similar to the etiology of LP, the exact reasons for these metabolic abnormalities in LP remain a mystery.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382016000300571
work_keys_str_mv AT oguzural arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT takcizennure arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT oguzisildeniz arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT resorluberkan arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT baltailknur arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
AT unsalali arepatientswithlichenplanusreallypronetourolithiasislichenplanusandurolithiasis
_version_ 1756428201400205312