Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective study to analyze the effectiveness of implantable penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 249 patients who received implants between 2001 and 2008. A total of 139 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation were interviewed. RESULTS: Approximately half of patients had previously used oral drugs before implantation of the prosthesis. About 45% had diabetes, 25.9% had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), and 64% had hypertension. Exchange was performed in 5.7% for fracture, inadequate size, or extrusion. A total of 24.5% of men had immediate postoperative pain, 7.9% had local infection, and 8.6% had other complications. Patients who had previously undergone RP were 3.2 times more likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients who had not (p = 0.061). Eighty-nine (64%) patients returned to having sex as they had before being diagnosed with ED. Ninety-two of the men (66.2%) had sexual intercourse one to two times per week. One hundred twenty patients (86.3%) rated their level of satisfaction as good, excellent or very good, which was similar to the percentage of partners. The mean follow-up was 40 months. CONCLUSION: Higher rates of postoperative infections and mechanical problems with the implant were found in this study as compared to other studies, which was probably associated with the relative lack of experience of the trainees who were performing the surgeries. Patients with a history of RP or diabetes mellitus prior to implantation were at higher risk of postoperative complications.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paranhos,Mario, Andrade,Enrico, Antunes,Alberto A., Barbieri,Ana L. N., Claro,Joaquim A., Srougi,Miguel
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000500009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382010000500009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820100005000092010-12-06Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin AmericaParanhos,MarioAndrade,EnricoAntunes,Alberto A.Barbieri,Ana L. N.Claro,Joaquim A.Srougi,Miguel penile prosthesis erectile dysfunction educational institution impotence PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective study to analyze the effectiveness of implantable penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 249 patients who received implants between 2001 and 2008. A total of 139 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation were interviewed. RESULTS: Approximately half of patients had previously used oral drugs before implantation of the prosthesis. About 45% had diabetes, 25.9% had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), and 64% had hypertension. Exchange was performed in 5.7% for fracture, inadequate size, or extrusion. A total of 24.5% of men had immediate postoperative pain, 7.9% had local infection, and 8.6% had other complications. Patients who had previously undergone RP were 3.2 times more likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients who had not (p = 0.061). Eighty-nine (64%) patients returned to having sex as they had before being diagnosed with ED. Ninety-two of the men (66.2%) had sexual intercourse one to two times per week. One hundred twenty patients (86.3%) rated their level of satisfaction as good, excellent or very good, which was similar to the percentage of partners. The mean follow-up was 40 months. CONCLUSION: Higher rates of postoperative infections and mechanical problems with the implant were found in this study as compared to other studies, which was probably associated with the relative lack of experience of the trainees who were performing the surgeries. Patients with a history of RP or diabetes mellitus prior to implantation were at higher risk of postoperative complications.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.36 n.5 20102010-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000500009en10.1590/S1677-55382010000500009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Paranhos,Mario
Andrade,Enrico
Antunes,Alberto A.
Barbieri,Ana L. N.
Claro,Joaquim A.
Srougi,Miguel
spellingShingle Paranhos,Mario
Andrade,Enrico
Antunes,Alberto A.
Barbieri,Ana L. N.
Claro,Joaquim A.
Srougi,Miguel
Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
author_facet Paranhos,Mario
Andrade,Enrico
Antunes,Alberto A.
Barbieri,Ana L. N.
Claro,Joaquim A.
Srougi,Miguel
author_sort Paranhos,Mario
title Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
title_short Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
title_full Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
title_fullStr Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America
title_sort penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in latin america
description PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective study to analyze the effectiveness of implantable penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 249 patients who received implants between 2001 and 2008. A total of 139 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation were interviewed. RESULTS: Approximately half of patients had previously used oral drugs before implantation of the prosthesis. About 45% had diabetes, 25.9% had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), and 64% had hypertension. Exchange was performed in 5.7% for fracture, inadequate size, or extrusion. A total of 24.5% of men had immediate postoperative pain, 7.9% had local infection, and 8.6% had other complications. Patients who had previously undergone RP were 3.2 times more likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients who had not (p = 0.061). Eighty-nine (64%) patients returned to having sex as they had before being diagnosed with ED. Ninety-two of the men (66.2%) had sexual intercourse one to two times per week. One hundred twenty patients (86.3%) rated their level of satisfaction as good, excellent or very good, which was similar to the percentage of partners. The mean follow-up was 40 months. CONCLUSION: Higher rates of postoperative infections and mechanical problems with the implant were found in this study as compared to other studies, which was probably associated with the relative lack of experience of the trainees who were performing the surgeries. Patients with a history of RP or diabetes mellitus prior to implantation were at higher risk of postoperative complications.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382010000500009
work_keys_str_mv AT paranhosmario penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
AT andradeenrico penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
AT antunesalbertoa penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
AT barbierianaln penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
AT clarojoaquima penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
AT srougimiguel penileprosthesisimplantationinanacademicinstitutioninlatinamerica
_version_ 1756428077135560704