Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors

OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of quantifying the adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies when determining the tumor's final stage in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy. To identify the best methodology for obtaining such data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostate biopsies from 132 patients were examined, with determination of Gleason histological grade and tumor volume in number of involved fragments, tumor extent of the fragment mostly affected by the tumor and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen. Theses parameters were statistically correlated with the neoplasia's final stage following the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: An average of 12 and a median of 14 biopsy fragments were evaluated per patient. In the univariate analysis the Gleason histological grade, the largest tumor extent in one fragment and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen were correlated with tumor stage of the surgical specimen. In the multivariate analysis, the Gleason histological grade and the total percentage of tumor were strongly correlated with the neoplasia's final stage. The risk of the tumor not being confined was 3 for Gleason 7 tumors and 10.6 for Gleason 8 tumors or above. In cases where the tumor involved more than 60% of the specimen, the risk of non-confined disease was 4.4 times. Among 19 patients with unfavorable histological parameters, Gleason > 7 and extension greater than 60% the tumor final stage was pT3 in 95%. CONCLUSION: When associated to the Gleason histological grade, tumor quantification in prostate biopsies is an important factor for determining organ-confined disease, and among the methods, total percentage of tumor is the most informative one. Such data should be included in the pathological report and must be incorporated in future nomograms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leite,Kátia R.M., Srougi,Miguel, Bevilacqua,Ruy G., Dall'Oglio,Marcos, Andreoni,Cássio, Kaufmann,José R., Nesrallah,Luciano, Nesrallah,Adriano, Camara-Lopes,Luiz H.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2003
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000600003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382003000600003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820030006000032004-05-07Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumorsLeite,Kátia R.M.Srougi,MiguelBevilacqua,Ruy G.Dall'Oglio,MarcosAndreoni,CássioKaufmann,José R.Nesrallah,LucianoNesrallah,AdrianoCamara-Lopes,Luiz H. prostate neoplasms biopsy needle pathology quantitative evaluation neoplasms staging OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of quantifying the adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies when determining the tumor's final stage in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy. To identify the best methodology for obtaining such data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostate biopsies from 132 patients were examined, with determination of Gleason histological grade and tumor volume in number of involved fragments, tumor extent of the fragment mostly affected by the tumor and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen. Theses parameters were statistically correlated with the neoplasia's final stage following the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: An average of 12 and a median of 14 biopsy fragments were evaluated per patient. In the univariate analysis the Gleason histological grade, the largest tumor extent in one fragment and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen were correlated with tumor stage of the surgical specimen. In the multivariate analysis, the Gleason histological grade and the total percentage of tumor were strongly correlated with the neoplasia's final stage. The risk of the tumor not being confined was 3 for Gleason 7 tumors and 10.6 for Gleason 8 tumors or above. In cases where the tumor involved more than 60% of the specimen, the risk of non-confined disease was 4.4 times. Among 19 patients with unfavorable histological parameters, Gleason > 7 and extension greater than 60% the tumor final stage was pT3 in 95%. CONCLUSION: When associated to the Gleason histological grade, tumor quantification in prostate biopsies is an important factor for determining organ-confined disease, and among the methods, total percentage of tumor is the most informative one. Such data should be included in the pathological report and must be incorporated in future nomograms.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.29 n.6 20032003-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000600003en10.1590/S1677-55382003000600003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Leite,Kátia R.M.
Srougi,Miguel
Bevilacqua,Ruy G.
Dall'Oglio,Marcos
Andreoni,Cássio
Kaufmann,José R.
Nesrallah,Luciano
Nesrallah,Adriano
Camara-Lopes,Luiz H.
spellingShingle Leite,Kátia R.M.
Srougi,Miguel
Bevilacqua,Ruy G.
Dall'Oglio,Marcos
Andreoni,Cássio
Kaufmann,José R.
Nesrallah,Luciano
Nesrallah,Adriano
Camara-Lopes,Luiz H.
Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
author_facet Leite,Kátia R.M.
Srougi,Miguel
Bevilacqua,Ruy G.
Dall'Oglio,Marcos
Andreoni,Cássio
Kaufmann,José R.
Nesrallah,Luciano
Nesrallah,Adriano
Camara-Lopes,Luiz H.
author_sort Leite,Kátia R.M.
title Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
title_short Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
title_full Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
title_fullStr Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
title_sort quantification of tumor extension in prostate biopsies: importance in the identification of confined tumors
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of quantifying the adenocarcinoma in prostate biopsies when determining the tumor's final stage in patients who undergo radical prostatectomy. To identify the best methodology for obtaining such data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostate biopsies from 132 patients were examined, with determination of Gleason histological grade and tumor volume in number of involved fragments, tumor extent of the fragment mostly affected by the tumor and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen. Theses parameters were statistically correlated with the neoplasia's final stage following the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: An average of 12 and a median of 14 biopsy fragments were evaluated per patient. In the univariate analysis the Gleason histological grade, the largest tumor extent in one fragment and the total percentage of tumor in the specimen were correlated with tumor stage of the surgical specimen. In the multivariate analysis, the Gleason histological grade and the total percentage of tumor were strongly correlated with the neoplasia's final stage. The risk of the tumor not being confined was 3 for Gleason 7 tumors and 10.6 for Gleason 8 tumors or above. In cases where the tumor involved more than 60% of the specimen, the risk of non-confined disease was 4.4 times. Among 19 patients with unfavorable histological parameters, Gleason > 7 and extension greater than 60% the tumor final stage was pT3 in 95%. CONCLUSION: When associated to the Gleason histological grade, tumor quantification in prostate biopsies is an important factor for determining organ-confined disease, and among the methods, total percentage of tumor is the most informative one. Such data should be included in the pathological report and must be incorporated in future nomograms.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382003000600003
work_keys_str_mv AT leitekatiarm quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT srougimiguel quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT bevilacquaruyg quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT dallogliomarcos quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT andreonicassio quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT kaufmannjoser quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT nesrallahluciano quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT nesrallahadriano quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
AT camaralopesluizh quantificationoftumorextensioninprostatebiopsiesimportanceintheidentificationofconfinedtumors
_version_ 1756427930519470080