Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study

The purpose of this study was to carry out a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis of the cleaning qualities and smear layer removal from root canal walls, instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl, 2.0% chlorhexidine and saline solutions. Fifty extracted teeth were used in this study. All teeth were radiographed to determine the existence of a single canal. The crowns were cut at the cervical limit and the root canals were instrumented with K-type files up to size 45. During root canal preparation, irrigations were made with the different solutions being evaluated: Group 1: 2.5% NaOCl (10 roots); Group 2: 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 2 minute (10 roots); Group 3: 2.0% chlorhexidine (10 roots); Group 4: 2.0% chlorhexidine and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (10 roots); Group 5: saline solution (5 roots); Group 6: saline solution and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (5 roots). After instrumentation, the canals were irrigated with each one of the solutions and the roots were cut in the buccolingual direction for SEM analysis, at the cervical, middle and apical thirds, to ascertain the presence or absence of smear layer and debris. SEM analysis was performed by three calibrated examiners and scores were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level of p = 5%. Results showed that the use of 17% EDTA decreased the smear layer significantly (p < 0.05) for all evaluated solutions in all thirds. When EDTA was not used, a significantly higher quantity of smear layer on the apical third was observed only in the NaOCl groups. The use of 17% EDTA was significant for debris removal except for the chlorhexidine groups. The following conclusion could be drawn: the use of 17% EDTA was necessary to enhance cleanness of the root canals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Menezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso de, Zanet,Caio Gorgulho, Valera,Márcia Carneiro
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica e Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo 2003
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-74912003000400010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1517-74912003000400010
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1517-749120030004000102004-04-16Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM studyMenezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso deZanet,Caio GorgulhoValera,Márcia Carneiro Smear layer Sodium hypochlorite Chlorhexidine EDTA Root canal irrigants The purpose of this study was to carry out a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis of the cleaning qualities and smear layer removal from root canal walls, instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl, 2.0% chlorhexidine and saline solutions. Fifty extracted teeth were used in this study. All teeth were radiographed to determine the existence of a single canal. The crowns were cut at the cervical limit and the root canals were instrumented with K-type files up to size 45. During root canal preparation, irrigations were made with the different solutions being evaluated: Group 1: 2.5% NaOCl (10 roots); Group 2: 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 2 minute (10 roots); Group 3: 2.0% chlorhexidine (10 roots); Group 4: 2.0% chlorhexidine and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (10 roots); Group 5: saline solution (5 roots); Group 6: saline solution and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (5 roots). After instrumentation, the canals were irrigated with each one of the solutions and the roots were cut in the buccolingual direction for SEM analysis, at the cervical, middle and apical thirds, to ascertain the presence or absence of smear layer and debris. SEM analysis was performed by three calibrated examiners and scores were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level of p = 5%. Results showed that the use of 17% EDTA decreased the smear layer significantly (p < 0.05) for all evaluated solutions in all thirds. When EDTA was not used, a significantly higher quantity of smear layer on the apical third was observed only in the NaOCl groups. The use of 17% EDTA was significant for debris removal except for the chlorhexidine groups. The following conclusion could be drawn: the use of 17% EDTA was necessary to enhance cleanness of the root canals.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica e Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São PauloPesquisa Odontológica Brasileira v.17 n.4 20032003-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-74912003000400010en10.1590/S1517-74912003000400010
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Menezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso de
Zanet,Caio Gorgulho
Valera,Márcia Carneiro
spellingShingle Menezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso de
Zanet,Caio Gorgulho
Valera,Márcia Carneiro
Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
author_facet Menezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso de
Zanet,Caio Gorgulho
Valera,Márcia Carneiro
author_sort Menezes,Ana Carolina Silveira Cardoso de
title Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
title_short Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
title_full Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
title_fullStr Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
title_full_unstemmed Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study
title_sort smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without edta for the irrigation of canals: a sem study
description The purpose of this study was to carry out a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis of the cleaning qualities and smear layer removal from root canal walls, instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl, 2.0% chlorhexidine and saline solutions. Fifty extracted teeth were used in this study. All teeth were radiographed to determine the existence of a single canal. The crowns were cut at the cervical limit and the root canals were instrumented with K-type files up to size 45. During root canal preparation, irrigations were made with the different solutions being evaluated: Group 1: 2.5% NaOCl (10 roots); Group 2: 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA for 2 minute (10 roots); Group 3: 2.0% chlorhexidine (10 roots); Group 4: 2.0% chlorhexidine and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (10 roots); Group 5: saline solution (5 roots); Group 6: saline solution and 17% EDTA for 2 minutes (5 roots). After instrumentation, the canals were irrigated with each one of the solutions and the roots were cut in the buccolingual direction for SEM analysis, at the cervical, middle and apical thirds, to ascertain the presence or absence of smear layer and debris. SEM analysis was performed by three calibrated examiners and scores were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level of p = 5%. Results showed that the use of 17% EDTA decreased the smear layer significantly (p < 0.05) for all evaluated solutions in all thirds. When EDTA was not used, a significantly higher quantity of smear layer on the apical third was observed only in the NaOCl groups. The use of 17% EDTA was significant for debris removal except for the chlorhexidine groups. The following conclusion could be drawn: the use of 17% EDTA was necessary to enhance cleanness of the root canals.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica e Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
publishDate 2003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-74912003000400010
work_keys_str_mv AT menezesanacarolinasilveiracardosode smearlayerremovalcapacityofdisinfectantsolutionsusedwithandwithoutedtafortheirrigationofcanalsasemstudy
AT zanetcaiogorgulho smearlayerremovalcapacityofdisinfectantsolutionsusedwithandwithoutedtafortheirrigationofcanalsasemstudy
AT valeramarciacarneiro smearlayerremovalcapacityofdisinfectantsolutionsusedwithandwithoutedtafortheirrigationofcanalsasemstudy
_version_ 1756424737073922048