Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to describe the housing system in the hospital pens on growing and finishing (GF) pig farms. This work was developed by using a questionnaire and was conducted between January and April, 2016. Forty-four GF commercial farms (a total of 41,111 animals) were involved, seeking to raise issues concerning the facilities of the hospital pens, environment, management, feeding and the reasons for transferring the animals to these accommodations. About 98% of the evaluated farms had, at least, one hospital pen. Most of these farms presented a percentage of animals evaluated (PAE) in the infirmary, of less than 1.5% of the total capacity of the animal housing on the farm. In 93.48% of the farms, the criterion used to transfer the animals to the infirmaries was when they were identified as “impaired, hurt, suffering”. In 47.83% of the cases, there were no differences between the hospital and common pens regarding the general management of the animals. The facilities and environment characteristics were similar in almost all hospital pens. Respiratory problems were the main reason for transferring pigs from the common to hospital pens. Under the conditions of this study, sufficient hospital pens exist on farms and overcrowding or competition for resources among pigs are avoided. However, there is no established standard among respondents about where to place the recovered animals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pierozan,Carlos Rodolfo, Dias,Cleandro Pazinato, Silva,Caio Abércio da
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982017001100831
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-35982017001100831
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-359820170011008312018-01-03Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive studyPierozan,Carlos RodolfoDias,Cleandro PazinatoSilva,Caio Abércio da animal welfare compromised pig infirmary pen recovery sick ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to describe the housing system in the hospital pens on growing and finishing (GF) pig farms. This work was developed by using a questionnaire and was conducted between January and April, 2016. Forty-four GF commercial farms (a total of 41,111 animals) were involved, seeking to raise issues concerning the facilities of the hospital pens, environment, management, feeding and the reasons for transferring the animals to these accommodations. About 98% of the evaluated farms had, at least, one hospital pen. Most of these farms presented a percentage of animals evaluated (PAE) in the infirmary, of less than 1.5% of the total capacity of the animal housing on the farm. In 93.48% of the farms, the criterion used to transfer the animals to the infirmaries was when they were identified as “impaired, hurt, suffering”. In 47.83% of the cases, there were no differences between the hospital and common pens regarding the general management of the animals. The facilities and environment characteristics were similar in almost all hospital pens. Respiratory problems were the main reason for transferring pigs from the common to hospital pens. Under the conditions of this study, sufficient hospital pens exist on farms and overcrowding or competition for resources among pigs are avoided. However, there is no established standard among respondents about where to place the recovered animals.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.46 n.11 20172017-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982017001100831en10.1590/s1806-92902017001100001
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Pierozan,Carlos Rodolfo
Dias,Cleandro Pazinato
Silva,Caio Abércio da
spellingShingle Pierozan,Carlos Rodolfo
Dias,Cleandro Pazinato
Silva,Caio Abércio da
Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
author_facet Pierozan,Carlos Rodolfo
Dias,Cleandro Pazinato
Silva,Caio Abércio da
author_sort Pierozan,Carlos Rodolfo
title Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
title_short Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
title_full Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
title_sort environment, facilities, and management of hospital pens in growing and finishing pig farms: a descriptive study
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to describe the housing system in the hospital pens on growing and finishing (GF) pig farms. This work was developed by using a questionnaire and was conducted between January and April, 2016. Forty-four GF commercial farms (a total of 41,111 animals) were involved, seeking to raise issues concerning the facilities of the hospital pens, environment, management, feeding and the reasons for transferring the animals to these accommodations. About 98% of the evaluated farms had, at least, one hospital pen. Most of these farms presented a percentage of animals evaluated (PAE) in the infirmary, of less than 1.5% of the total capacity of the animal housing on the farm. In 93.48% of the farms, the criterion used to transfer the animals to the infirmaries was when they were identified as “impaired, hurt, suffering”. In 47.83% of the cases, there were no differences between the hospital and common pens regarding the general management of the animals. The facilities and environment characteristics were similar in almost all hospital pens. Respiratory problems were the main reason for transferring pigs from the common to hospital pens. Under the conditions of this study, sufficient hospital pens exist on farms and overcrowding or competition for resources among pigs are avoided. However, there is no established standard among respondents about where to place the recovered animals.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982017001100831
work_keys_str_mv AT pierozancarlosrodolfo environmentfacilitiesandmanagementofhospitalpensingrowingandfinishingpigfarmsadescriptivestudy
AT diascleandropazinato environmentfacilitiesandmanagementofhospitalpensingrowingandfinishingpigfarmsadescriptivestudy
AT silvacaioabercioda environmentfacilitiesandmanagementofhospitalpensingrowingandfinishingpigfarmsadescriptivestudy
_version_ 1756422434288828416