Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing

The aim of this work was to compare the in vitro wear and roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing. Six resins were tested: Revolution (Kerr), Natural Flow (DFL), Flow It! (Jeneric-Pentron), Fill Magic Flow (Vigodent) - flowable composites, Silux Plus (3M) - microfilled composite, and Z100 (3M) - hybrid composite. Eight disks were prepared for each group (n = 48), with 12 mm in diameter and 1mm thick. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 7 days, polished (Super Snap), weighed and submitted to the initial roughness test. Each sample was fixed on plexiglass plates and subjected to simulated toothbrushing. After abrasion, the samples were removed from the plates, weighed and submitted to the post-abrasion roughness test. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Pearson's test was used to verify correlation between wear and roughness. Data showed a similar resistance to wear of Natural Flow and Z100, both presenting minimum mass loss and surface roughness. Silux Plus presented the roughest surface after toothbrushing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chimello,D.T., Dibb,R.G.P., Corona,S.A.M., Lara,E.H.G.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: ABM, ABC, ABPol 2001
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392001000400011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1516-14392001000400011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1516-143920010004000112002-01-09Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushingChimello,D.T.Dibb,R.G.P.Corona,S.A.M.Lara,E.H.G. wear roughness composite resin toothbrushing The aim of this work was to compare the in vitro wear and roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing. Six resins were tested: Revolution (Kerr), Natural Flow (DFL), Flow It! (Jeneric-Pentron), Fill Magic Flow (Vigodent) - flowable composites, Silux Plus (3M) - microfilled composite, and Z100 (3M) - hybrid composite. Eight disks were prepared for each group (n = 48), with 12 mm in diameter and 1mm thick. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 7 days, polished (Super Snap), weighed and submitted to the initial roughness test. Each sample was fixed on plexiglass plates and subjected to simulated toothbrushing. After abrasion, the samples were removed from the plates, weighed and submitted to the post-abrasion roughness test. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Pearson's test was used to verify correlation between wear and roughness. Data showed a similar resistance to wear of Natural Flow and Z100, both presenting minimum mass loss and surface roughness. Silux Plus presented the roughest surface after toothbrushing.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessABM, ABC, ABPolMaterials Research v.4 n.4 20012001-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392001000400011en10.1590/S1516-14392001000400011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Chimello,D.T.
Dibb,R.G.P.
Corona,S.A.M.
Lara,E.H.G.
spellingShingle Chimello,D.T.
Dibb,R.G.P.
Corona,S.A.M.
Lara,E.H.G.
Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
author_facet Chimello,D.T.
Dibb,R.G.P.
Corona,S.A.M.
Lara,E.H.G.
author_sort Chimello,D.T.
title Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
title_short Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
title_full Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
title_fullStr Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
title_full_unstemmed Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
title_sort assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing
description The aim of this work was to compare the in vitro wear and roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing. Six resins were tested: Revolution (Kerr), Natural Flow (DFL), Flow It! (Jeneric-Pentron), Fill Magic Flow (Vigodent) - flowable composites, Silux Plus (3M) - microfilled composite, and Z100 (3M) - hybrid composite. Eight disks were prepared for each group (n = 48), with 12 mm in diameter and 1mm thick. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 7 days, polished (Super Snap), weighed and submitted to the initial roughness test. Each sample was fixed on plexiglass plates and subjected to simulated toothbrushing. After abrasion, the samples were removed from the plates, weighed and submitted to the post-abrasion roughness test. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Pearson's test was used to verify correlation between wear and roughness. Data showed a similar resistance to wear of Natural Flow and Z100, both presenting minimum mass loss and surface roughness. Silux Plus presented the roughest surface after toothbrushing.
publisher ABM, ABC, ABPol
publishDate 2001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392001000400011
work_keys_str_mv AT chimellodt assessingwearandsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositeresinsaftertoothbrushing
AT dibbrgp assessingwearandsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositeresinsaftertoothbrushing
AT coronasam assessingwearandsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositeresinsaftertoothbrushing
AT laraehg assessingwearandsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositeresinsaftertoothbrushing
_version_ 1756420264517697536