On the dismal state of a dismal science?

The paper discusses the dismal state of contemporary mainstream macroeconomics. This state, long decried by critics of the macroeconomics advocated by Chicago economists, was brought to the attention of the general public on the occasion of the recent financial and economic crisis. Since then several previous staunch supporters of the free-market doctrine have revised their beliefs and distanced themselves from the rational-expectations-representative-agent-efficient-markets and other approach. The idea that economics could be shaped in the image of the so-called hard or exact sciences, most notably physics, has been given a serious blow. It is then argued that the full employment assumption entertained by Robert Lucas and his followers has dispensed with the very problem that once had been the raison d'être of macro-theory, namely to explain when and why markets and especially the labour market don't clear, and what can be done about it. Lucas's enunciation of "the death of Keynesian economics" has turned out to be premature and his critique of Keynes's contribution as "just so much hot air" as simply ridiculous. The paper concludes with an alternative "classical" view of how a market economy works and what the role of prices is and in which effective demand plays a crucial role.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kurz,Heinz D.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Economía 2010
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-16672010000400002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0185-16672010000400002
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0185-166720100004000022012-03-14On the dismal state of a dismal science?Kurz,Heinz D. crisis dismal science Keynes Lucas macroeconomics The paper discusses the dismal state of contemporary mainstream macroeconomics. This state, long decried by critics of the macroeconomics advocated by Chicago economists, was brought to the attention of the general public on the occasion of the recent financial and economic crisis. Since then several previous staunch supporters of the free-market doctrine have revised their beliefs and distanced themselves from the rational-expectations-representative-agent-efficient-markets and other approach. The idea that economics could be shaped in the image of the so-called hard or exact sciences, most notably physics, has been given a serious blow. It is then argued that the full employment assumption entertained by Robert Lucas and his followers has dispensed with the very problem that once had been the raison d'être of macro-theory, namely to explain when and why markets and especially the labour market don't clear, and what can be done about it. Lucas's enunciation of "the death of Keynesian economics" has turned out to be premature and his critique of Keynes's contribution as "just so much hot air" as simply ridiculous. The paper concludes with an alternative "classical" view of how a market economy works and what the role of prices is and in which effective demand plays a crucial role.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de EconomíaInvestigación económica v.69 n.274 20102010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-16672010000400002en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country México
countrycode MX
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-mx
tag revista
region America del Norte
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Kurz,Heinz D.
spellingShingle Kurz,Heinz D.
On the dismal state of a dismal science?
author_facet Kurz,Heinz D.
author_sort Kurz,Heinz D.
title On the dismal state of a dismal science?
title_short On the dismal state of a dismal science?
title_full On the dismal state of a dismal science?
title_fullStr On the dismal state of a dismal science?
title_full_unstemmed On the dismal state of a dismal science?
title_sort on the dismal state of a dismal science?
description The paper discusses the dismal state of contemporary mainstream macroeconomics. This state, long decried by critics of the macroeconomics advocated by Chicago economists, was brought to the attention of the general public on the occasion of the recent financial and economic crisis. Since then several previous staunch supporters of the free-market doctrine have revised their beliefs and distanced themselves from the rational-expectations-representative-agent-efficient-markets and other approach. The idea that economics could be shaped in the image of the so-called hard or exact sciences, most notably physics, has been given a serious blow. It is then argued that the full employment assumption entertained by Robert Lucas and his followers has dispensed with the very problem that once had been the raison d'être of macro-theory, namely to explain when and why markets and especially the labour market don't clear, and what can be done about it. Lucas's enunciation of "the death of Keynesian economics" has turned out to be premature and his critique of Keynes's contribution as "just so much hot air" as simply ridiculous. The paper concludes with an alternative "classical" view of how a market economy works and what the role of prices is and in which effective demand plays a crucial role.
publisher Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Economía
publishDate 2010
url http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-16672010000400002
work_keys_str_mv AT kurzheinzd onthedismalstateofadismalscience
_version_ 1756221115003305985