Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques

Abstract Purpose: To compare the fixation of the central venous catheter (CVC) using two suture techniques. Methods: A clinical, analytical, interventional, longitudinal, prospective, controlled, single-blind and randomized study in adult, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. After admission and indication of CVC use, the patients were allocated to the Wing group (n = 35, catheter fixation with clamping wings and retainers) or Shoelace group (n = 35, catheter fixation using shoelace cross-tied sutures around the device). Displacement, kinking, fixation failure, hyperemia at the insertion site, purulent secretion, loss of the device, psychomotor agitation, mental confusion, and bacterial growth at the insertion site were evaluated. Results: Compared with the Wing group, the Shoelace group had a lower occurrence of catheter displacement (n=0 versus n =4; p = 0.04), kinking (n=0 versus n=8; p=0.001), and fixation failure (n=2 versus n=8; p=0.018). No significant difference was found in bacterial growth (n=20 versus n=14; p=0.267) between groups. Conclusion: The Shoelace fixation technique presented fewer adverse events than the Wing fixation technique.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leal,Mário Lúcio Marques, Loyola,Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira, Hueb,Alexandre Ciappina, Silva Neto,José Dias da, Mesquita Filho,Marcos, Paiva,Luiz Francisley de, Guerrieri,Mauricio Landulfo Jorge, Fernandes,João Paulo Nunes, Barros,Artur Costa, Ferreira,Lydia Masako
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502017000800680
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0102-86502017000800680
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0102-865020170008006802017-09-04Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniquesLeal,Mário Lúcio MarquesLoyola,Ana Beatriz Alkmim TeixeiraHueb,Alexandre CiappinaSilva Neto,José Dias daMesquita Filho,MarcosPaiva,Luiz Francisley deGuerrieri,Mauricio Landulfo JorgeFernandes,João Paulo NunesBarros,Artur CostaFerreira,Lydia Masako Catheters Vascular Access Devices Suture Techniques Microbiota Blood Circulation. Abstract Purpose: To compare the fixation of the central venous catheter (CVC) using two suture techniques. Methods: A clinical, analytical, interventional, longitudinal, prospective, controlled, single-blind and randomized study in adult, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. After admission and indication of CVC use, the patients were allocated to the Wing group (n = 35, catheter fixation with clamping wings and retainers) or Shoelace group (n = 35, catheter fixation using shoelace cross-tied sutures around the device). Displacement, kinking, fixation failure, hyperemia at the insertion site, purulent secretion, loss of the device, psychomotor agitation, mental confusion, and bacterial growth at the insertion site were evaluated. Results: Compared with the Wing group, the Shoelace group had a lower occurrence of catheter displacement (n=0 versus n =4; p = 0.04), kinking (n=0 versus n=8; p=0.001), and fixation failure (n=2 versus n=8; p=0.018). No significant difference was found in bacterial growth (n=20 versus n=14; p=0.267) between groups. Conclusion: The Shoelace fixation technique presented fewer adverse events than the Wing fixation technique.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em CirurgiaActa Cirúrgica Brasileira v.32 n.8 20172017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502017000800680en10.1590/s0102-865020170080000010
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Leal,Mário Lúcio Marques
Loyola,Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira
Hueb,Alexandre Ciappina
Silva Neto,José Dias da
Mesquita Filho,Marcos
Paiva,Luiz Francisley de
Guerrieri,Mauricio Landulfo Jorge
Fernandes,João Paulo Nunes
Barros,Artur Costa
Ferreira,Lydia Masako
spellingShingle Leal,Mário Lúcio Marques
Loyola,Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira
Hueb,Alexandre Ciappina
Silva Neto,José Dias da
Mesquita Filho,Marcos
Paiva,Luiz Francisley de
Guerrieri,Mauricio Landulfo Jorge
Fernandes,João Paulo Nunes
Barros,Artur Costa
Ferreira,Lydia Masako
Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
author_facet Leal,Mário Lúcio Marques
Loyola,Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira
Hueb,Alexandre Ciappina
Silva Neto,José Dias da
Mesquita Filho,Marcos
Paiva,Luiz Francisley de
Guerrieri,Mauricio Landulfo Jorge
Fernandes,João Paulo Nunes
Barros,Artur Costa
Ferreira,Lydia Masako
author_sort Leal,Mário Lúcio Marques
title Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
title_short Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
title_full Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
title_fullStr Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
title_full_unstemmed Fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. A comparison of two techniques
title_sort fixation of the short-term central venous catheter. a comparison of two techniques
description Abstract Purpose: To compare the fixation of the central venous catheter (CVC) using two suture techniques. Methods: A clinical, analytical, interventional, longitudinal, prospective, controlled, single-blind and randomized study in adult, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. After admission and indication of CVC use, the patients were allocated to the Wing group (n = 35, catheter fixation with clamping wings and retainers) or Shoelace group (n = 35, catheter fixation using shoelace cross-tied sutures around the device). Displacement, kinking, fixation failure, hyperemia at the insertion site, purulent secretion, loss of the device, psychomotor agitation, mental confusion, and bacterial growth at the insertion site were evaluated. Results: Compared with the Wing group, the Shoelace group had a lower occurrence of catheter displacement (n=0 versus n =4; p = 0.04), kinking (n=0 versus n=8; p=0.001), and fixation failure (n=2 versus n=8; p=0.018). No significant difference was found in bacterial growth (n=20 versus n=14; p=0.267) between groups. Conclusion: The Shoelace fixation technique presented fewer adverse events than the Wing fixation technique.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502017000800680
work_keys_str_mv AT lealmarioluciomarques fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT loyolaanabeatrizalkmimteixeira fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT huebalexandreciappina fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT silvanetojosediasda fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT mesquitafilhomarcos fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT paivaluizfrancisleyde fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT guerrierimauriciolandulfojorge fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT fernandesjoaopaulonunes fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT barrosarturcosta fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
AT ferreiralydiamasako fixationoftheshorttermcentralvenouscatheteracomparisonoftwotechniques
_version_ 1756401010353373184