Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation

Abstract Introduction: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) present high mortality from cardiovascular complications and high morbidity, including decreasing functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: To analyze clinical and laboratory responses of patients in HD to intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation on an outpatient basis. Methods: We evaluated 14 patients in a prospective study for 8 months using cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol (CRehab) consisted of intradialytic aerobic exercise with a cycle ergometer. We analyzed heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and modified Borg scale. We evaluated cardiac function by echocardiogram, functional capacity by six minutes walk test (6MWT), and quality of life by SF-36 survey, before and after CRehab. Biochemical data and KT/Vsp were collected form medical records. Results: During CRehab, the results of HR, SBP, DBP, SpO2 and Borg scale showed no significant changes. 6MWT test showed progressive increase in the distance covered (p < 0.001) as well as a reduction in the scale of Borg post-6MWT (p = 0.009). There was no significant change in any biochemical data or in KT/Vsp. There was increase in left ventricular ejection from 65.7 ± 10.2% to 73.6 ± 10.1% (p = 0.028) and in left ventricular diastolic diameter (p = 0.027). According to SF-36 survey, patients showed improvement in three areas: physical role functioning (p = 0.012), bodily pain (p = 0.007) and vitality (p = 0.009). Conclusion: The intradialytic CRehab applied in this population was safe and allowed objective improvement of functional capacity and exercise tolerance, subjective improvement in the perception of effort, significant increase in cardiac function and better quality of life in different domains.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guio,Bruno Medeiros, Gomes,Carlos Perez, Costa,Fabio Brandão da, Oliveira,Adriana dos Santos de, Duarte,Marta Turano, Leite Júnior,Maurilo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000300275
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0101-28002017000300275
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0101-280020170003002752017-10-10Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitationGuio,Bruno MedeirosGomes,Carlos PerezCosta,Fabio Brandão daOliveira,Adriana dos Santos deDuarte,Marta TuranoLeite Júnior,Maurilo renal insufficiency, chronic renal dialysis quality of life exercise Abstract Introduction: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) present high mortality from cardiovascular complications and high morbidity, including decreasing functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: To analyze clinical and laboratory responses of patients in HD to intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation on an outpatient basis. Methods: We evaluated 14 patients in a prospective study for 8 months using cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol (CRehab) consisted of intradialytic aerobic exercise with a cycle ergometer. We analyzed heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and modified Borg scale. We evaluated cardiac function by echocardiogram, functional capacity by six minutes walk test (6MWT), and quality of life by SF-36 survey, before and after CRehab. Biochemical data and KT/Vsp were collected form medical records. Results: During CRehab, the results of HR, SBP, DBP, SpO2 and Borg scale showed no significant changes. 6MWT test showed progressive increase in the distance covered (p < 0.001) as well as a reduction in the scale of Borg post-6MWT (p = 0.009). There was no significant change in any biochemical data or in KT/Vsp. There was increase in left ventricular ejection from 65.7 ± 10.2% to 73.6 ± 10.1% (p = 0.028) and in left ventricular diastolic diameter (p = 0.027). According to SF-36 survey, patients showed improvement in three areas: physical role functioning (p = 0.012), bodily pain (p = 0.007) and vitality (p = 0.009). Conclusion: The intradialytic CRehab applied in this population was safe and allowed objective improvement of functional capacity and exercise tolerance, subjective improvement in the perception of effort, significant increase in cardiac function and better quality of life in different domains.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de NefrologiaBrazilian Journal of Nephrology v.39 n.3 20172017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000300275en10.5935/0101-2800.20170051
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Guio,Bruno Medeiros
Gomes,Carlos Perez
Costa,Fabio Brandão da
Oliveira,Adriana dos Santos de
Duarte,Marta Turano
Leite Júnior,Maurilo
spellingShingle Guio,Bruno Medeiros
Gomes,Carlos Perez
Costa,Fabio Brandão da
Oliveira,Adriana dos Santos de
Duarte,Marta Turano
Leite Júnior,Maurilo
Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
author_facet Guio,Bruno Medeiros
Gomes,Carlos Perez
Costa,Fabio Brandão da
Oliveira,Adriana dos Santos de
Duarte,Marta Turano
Leite Júnior,Maurilo
author_sort Guio,Bruno Medeiros
title Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
title_short Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
title_full Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
title_fullStr Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
title_sort beneficial effects of intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation
description Abstract Introduction: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) present high mortality from cardiovascular complications and high morbidity, including decreasing functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: To analyze clinical and laboratory responses of patients in HD to intradialytic cardiopulmonary rehabilitation on an outpatient basis. Methods: We evaluated 14 patients in a prospective study for 8 months using cardiopulmonary rehabilitation protocol (CRehab) consisted of intradialytic aerobic exercise with a cycle ergometer. We analyzed heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and modified Borg scale. We evaluated cardiac function by echocardiogram, functional capacity by six minutes walk test (6MWT), and quality of life by SF-36 survey, before and after CRehab. Biochemical data and KT/Vsp were collected form medical records. Results: During CRehab, the results of HR, SBP, DBP, SpO2 and Borg scale showed no significant changes. 6MWT test showed progressive increase in the distance covered (p < 0.001) as well as a reduction in the scale of Borg post-6MWT (p = 0.009). There was no significant change in any biochemical data or in KT/Vsp. There was increase in left ventricular ejection from 65.7 ± 10.2% to 73.6 ± 10.1% (p = 0.028) and in left ventricular diastolic diameter (p = 0.027). According to SF-36 survey, patients showed improvement in three areas: physical role functioning (p = 0.012), bodily pain (p = 0.007) and vitality (p = 0.009). Conclusion: The intradialytic CRehab applied in this population was safe and allowed objective improvement of functional capacity and exercise tolerance, subjective improvement in the perception of effort, significant increase in cardiac function and better quality of life in different domains.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000300275
work_keys_str_mv AT guiobrunomedeiros beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT gomescarlosperez beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT costafabiobrandaoda beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT oliveiraadrianadossantosde beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT duartemartaturano beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
AT leitejuniormaurilo beneficialeffectsofintradialyticcardiopulmonaryrehabilitation
_version_ 1756392639055265792