Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients

Abstract Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a main viral infection after kidney transplantation. The diagnostic methods currently employed are pp65 antigenemia and nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and aim at detecting viral replication. Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare by both methods the incidence of CMV active infection in kidney transplant patients and to establishthe best clinical-laboratory correlation. Methods: Thirty sequential kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a single center prospective cohort study. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from day 15 until the 6th month after transplantation and tested for CMV replication by pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR assays (qPCR). Results: Two hundred forty samples were analyzed and the incidence of active infection was similar by both methods. Time elapsed to the first positive test was almost identical but more samples tested positive by qPCR than by antigenemia in a behavior that was almost evenly distributed overtime. Agreement between tests was observed in 217 samples (90.4%; kappa = 0.529; p < 0.001) and in 25 patients the tests were concordant (83.3%; kappa = 0.667; p < 0.001). The evaluation of the diagnostic parameters for CMV replication revealed higher sensitivity for the qPCR test (82.1%) against antigenemia (59.0%). Quantitative PCR was also slightly more accurate than antigenemia. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that both methods are suitable and have almost equivalent accuracy for the detection of post-transplant cytomegalovirus replication. The choice for either test must take in consideration the demand, execution capability and cost-effectiveness at each institution.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franco,Rodrigo Fontanive, Montenegro,Rosangela Munhoz, Machado,Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro, Paris,Fernanda de, Menezes,Denise Silva, Manfro,Roberto Ceratti
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000100046
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0101-28002017000100046
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0101-280020170001000462017-03-22Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipientsFranco,Rodrigo FontaniveMontenegro,Rosangela MunhozMachado,Alice Beatriz Mombach PinheiroParis,Fernanda deMenezes,Denise SilvaManfro,Roberto Ceratti cytomegalovirus immunohistochemistry kidney transplantation polymerase chain reaction Abstract Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a main viral infection after kidney transplantation. The diagnostic methods currently employed are pp65 antigenemia and nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and aim at detecting viral replication. Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare by both methods the incidence of CMV active infection in kidney transplant patients and to establishthe best clinical-laboratory correlation. Methods: Thirty sequential kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a single center prospective cohort study. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from day 15 until the 6th month after transplantation and tested for CMV replication by pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR assays (qPCR). Results: Two hundred forty samples were analyzed and the incidence of active infection was similar by both methods. Time elapsed to the first positive test was almost identical but more samples tested positive by qPCR than by antigenemia in a behavior that was almost evenly distributed overtime. Agreement between tests was observed in 217 samples (90.4%; kappa = 0.529; p < 0.001) and in 25 patients the tests were concordant (83.3%; kappa = 0.667; p < 0.001). The evaluation of the diagnostic parameters for CMV replication revealed higher sensitivity for the qPCR test (82.1%) against antigenemia (59.0%). Quantitative PCR was also slightly more accurate than antigenemia. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that both methods are suitable and have almost equivalent accuracy for the detection of post-transplant cytomegalovirus replication. The choice for either test must take in consideration the demand, execution capability and cost-effectiveness at each institution.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de NefrologiaBrazilian Journal of Nephrology v.39 n.1 20172017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000100046en10.5935/0101-2800.20170008
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Franco,Rodrigo Fontanive
Montenegro,Rosangela Munhoz
Machado,Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Paris,Fernanda de
Menezes,Denise Silva
Manfro,Roberto Ceratti
spellingShingle Franco,Rodrigo Fontanive
Montenegro,Rosangela Munhoz
Machado,Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Paris,Fernanda de
Menezes,Denise Silva
Manfro,Roberto Ceratti
Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
author_facet Franco,Rodrigo Fontanive
Montenegro,Rosangela Munhoz
Machado,Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro
Paris,Fernanda de
Menezes,Denise Silva
Manfro,Roberto Ceratti
author_sort Franco,Rodrigo Fontanive
title Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
title_short Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
title_full Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
title_fullStr Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
title_sort evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients
description Abstract Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a main viral infection after kidney transplantation. The diagnostic methods currently employed are pp65 antigenemia and nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and aim at detecting viral replication. Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare by both methods the incidence of CMV active infection in kidney transplant patients and to establishthe best clinical-laboratory correlation. Methods: Thirty sequential kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a single center prospective cohort study. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from day 15 until the 6th month after transplantation and tested for CMV replication by pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR assays (qPCR). Results: Two hundred forty samples were analyzed and the incidence of active infection was similar by both methods. Time elapsed to the first positive test was almost identical but more samples tested positive by qPCR than by antigenemia in a behavior that was almost evenly distributed overtime. Agreement between tests was observed in 217 samples (90.4%; kappa = 0.529; p < 0.001) and in 25 patients the tests were concordant (83.3%; kappa = 0.667; p < 0.001). The evaluation of the diagnostic parameters for CMV replication revealed higher sensitivity for the qPCR test (82.1%) against antigenemia (59.0%). Quantitative PCR was also slightly more accurate than antigenemia. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that both methods are suitable and have almost equivalent accuracy for the detection of post-transplant cytomegalovirus replication. The choice for either test must take in consideration the demand, execution capability and cost-effectiveness at each institution.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002017000100046
work_keys_str_mv AT francorodrigofontanive evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
AT montenegrorosangelamunhoz evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
AT machadoalicebeatrizmombachpinheiro evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
AT parisfernandade evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
AT menezesdenisesilva evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
AT manfrorobertoceratti evaluationofdiagnostictestsforcytomegalovirusactiveinfectioninrenaltransplantrecipients
_version_ 1756392633327943680