Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation

PURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dinis,Sofia Raposo, Domingues,Ana Patrícia, Belo,Adriana, Couto,Daniela, Fonseca,Etelvina, Moura,Paulo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032015000500216
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0100-72032015000500216
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0100-720320150005002162015-06-15Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestationDinis,Sofia RaposoDomingues,Ana PatríciaBelo,AdrianaCouto,DanielaFonseca,EtelvinaMoura,Paulo Twins Induced reproduction Pregnancy outcome PURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e ObstetríciaRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia v.37 n.5 20152015-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032015000500216en10.1590/SO100-720320150005272
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Dinis,Sofia Raposo
Domingues,Ana Patrícia
Belo,Adriana
Couto,Daniela
Fonseca,Etelvina
Moura,Paulo
spellingShingle Dinis,Sofia Raposo
Domingues,Ana Patrícia
Belo,Adriana
Couto,Daniela
Fonseca,Etelvina
Moura,Paulo
Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
author_facet Dinis,Sofia Raposo
Domingues,Ana Patrícia
Belo,Adriana
Couto,Daniela
Fonseca,Etelvina
Moura,Paulo
author_sort Dinis,Sofia Raposo
title Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_short Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_full Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_fullStr Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_full_unstemmed Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_sort do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? comparison to spontaneous gestation
description PURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.
publisher Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032015000500216
work_keys_str_mv AT dinissofiaraposo doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
AT dominguesanapatricia doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
AT beloadriana doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
AT coutodaniela doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
AT fonsecaetelvina doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
AT mourapaulo doinducedtwinpregnanciesinfluencetheobstetricandneonatalresultsofmultiplebirthsbornbefore32weekscomparisontospontaneousgestation
_version_ 1756389738519986176