Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”
ABSTRACT Objective: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. Method: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. Results: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. Conclusion: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem
2022
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100514 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0080-62342022000100514 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0080-623420220001005142022-12-13Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”Melo,Nádia Proença deSouza,Juliana Martins deCordeiro,Samara MacedoVeríssimo,Maria de La Ó Ramallo Child Developmen Validation Stud Pediatric nursin Nursing Diagnosi Terminology ABSTRACT Objective: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. Method: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. Results: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. Conclusion: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola de EnfermagemRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP v.56 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100514en10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0229en |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Melo,Nádia Proença de Souza,Juliana Martins de Cordeiro,Samara Macedo Veríssimo,Maria de La Ó Ramallo |
spellingShingle |
Melo,Nádia Proença de Souza,Juliana Martins de Cordeiro,Samara Macedo Veríssimo,Maria de La Ó Ramallo Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
author_facet |
Melo,Nádia Proença de Souza,Juliana Martins de Cordeiro,Samara Macedo Veríssimo,Maria de La Ó Ramallo |
author_sort |
Melo,Nádia Proença de |
title |
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
title_short |
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
title_full |
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
title_fullStr |
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development” |
title_sort |
clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “risk for delayed child development” |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To validate clinically the risk factors of the nursing diagnosis “Risk for delayed child development”. Method: Cross-sectional quantitative study carried out in a specialty outpatient clinic and in family health units with 124 children. The data was collected through interviews with the children’s guardians to investigate the risk factors for delay in child development. Results: The tested risk factors affected 108 of the evaluated children (87.1%). In the accuracy tests, most specificity values were above 80% and sensitivity values were lower than 30%. Most risk factors had odds ratio >1, three of which were noteworthy: genetic disorder (OR = 38, p < 0.05) and congenital disorder (OR = 4.4, p < 0.05), among child-related aspects, and impaired cognitive development in parents (OR = 27, p < 0.05), among caregiver-related aspects. Conclusion: The study contributed to a refined diagnostic accuracy, identifying potential associated factors of the evaluated diagnosis. |
publisher |
Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342022000100514 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melonadiaproencade clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT souzajulianamartinsde clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT cordeirosamaramacedo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment AT verissimomariadelaoramallo clinicalvalidationofthenursingdiagnosisriskfordelayedchilddevelopment |
_version_ |
1756472190647140352 |