Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil

Background: Echocardiography, though non-invasive and having relatively low-cost, presents issues of variability which can limit its use in epidemiological studies. Objective: To evaluate left ventricular mass reproducibility when assessed at acquisition (online) compared to when assessed at a reading center after electronic transmission (offline) and also when assessed by different readers at the reading center. Methods: Echocardiographers from the 6 ELSA-Brasil study investigation centers measured the left ventricular mass online during the acquisition from 124 studies before transmitting to the reading center, where studies were read according to the study protocol. Half of these studies were blindly read by a second reader in the reading center. Results: From the 124 echocardiograms, 5 (4%) were considered not measurable. Among the remaining 119, 72 (61%) were women, mean age was 50.2 ± 7.0 years and 2 had structural myocardial abnormalities. Images were considered to be optimal/ good by the reading center for 110 (92.4%) cases. No significant difference existed between online and offline measurements (1,29 g, CI 95% −3.60-6.19), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between them was 0.79 (CI 95% 0.71-0.85). For images read by two readers, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86 (CI 95% 0.78-0.91). Conclusion: There were no significant drifts between online and offline left ventricular mass measurements, and reproducibility was similar to that described in previous studies. Central quantitative assessment of echocardiographic studies in reading centers, as performed in the ELSA-Brasil study, is feasible and useful in clinical and epidemiological studies performed in our setting.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tognon,Alexandre Pereira, Foppa,Murilo, Luft,Vivian Cristine, Chambless,Lloyd Ellwood, Lotufo,Paulo, El Aouar,Lilia Maria Mameri, Fernandes,Luciana Pereira, Duncan,Bruce Bartholow
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015000200003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0066-782X2015000200003
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0066-782X20150002000032015-04-08Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-BrasilTognon,Alexandre PereiraFoppa,MuriloLuft,Vivian CristineChambless,Lloyd EllwoodLotufo,PauloEl Aouar,Lilia Maria MameriFernandes,Luciana PereiraDuncan,Bruce Bartholow Hypertrophy Left Ventricular Echocardiography Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Multicenter Studies Reproducibiity of Results Background: Echocardiography, though non-invasive and having relatively low-cost, presents issues of variability which can limit its use in epidemiological studies. Objective: To evaluate left ventricular mass reproducibility when assessed at acquisition (online) compared to when assessed at a reading center after electronic transmission (offline) and also when assessed by different readers at the reading center. Methods: Echocardiographers from the 6 ELSA-Brasil study investigation centers measured the left ventricular mass online during the acquisition from 124 studies before transmitting to the reading center, where studies were read according to the study protocol. Half of these studies were blindly read by a second reader in the reading center. Results: From the 124 echocardiograms, 5 (4%) were considered not measurable. Among the remaining 119, 72 (61%) were women, mean age was 50.2 ± 7.0 years and 2 had structural myocardial abnormalities. Images were considered to be optimal/ good by the reading center for 110 (92.4%) cases. No significant difference existed between online and offline measurements (1,29 g, CI 95% −3.60-6.19), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between them was 0.79 (CI 95% 0.71-0.85). For images read by two readers, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86 (CI 95% 0.78-0.91). Conclusion: There were no significant drifts between online and offline left ventricular mass measurements, and reproducibility was similar to that described in previous studies. Central quantitative assessment of echocardiographic studies in reading centers, as performed in the ELSA-Brasil study, is feasible and useful in clinical and epidemiological studies performed in our setting. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBCArquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.104 n.2 20152015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015000200003en10.5935/abc.20140183
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tognon,Alexandre Pereira
Foppa,Murilo
Luft,Vivian Cristine
Chambless,Lloyd Ellwood
Lotufo,Paulo
El Aouar,Lilia Maria Mameri
Fernandes,Luciana Pereira
Duncan,Bruce Bartholow
spellingShingle Tognon,Alexandre Pereira
Foppa,Murilo
Luft,Vivian Cristine
Chambless,Lloyd Ellwood
Lotufo,Paulo
El Aouar,Lilia Maria Mameri
Fernandes,Luciana Pereira
Duncan,Bruce Bartholow
Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
author_facet Tognon,Alexandre Pereira
Foppa,Murilo
Luft,Vivian Cristine
Chambless,Lloyd Ellwood
Lotufo,Paulo
El Aouar,Lilia Maria Mameri
Fernandes,Luciana Pereira
Duncan,Bruce Bartholow
author_sort Tognon,Alexandre Pereira
title Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
title_short Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
title_full Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Mass by Echocardiogram in the ELSA-Brasil
title_sort reproducibility of left ventricular mass by echocardiogram in the elsa-brasil
description Background: Echocardiography, though non-invasive and having relatively low-cost, presents issues of variability which can limit its use in epidemiological studies. Objective: To evaluate left ventricular mass reproducibility when assessed at acquisition (online) compared to when assessed at a reading center after electronic transmission (offline) and also when assessed by different readers at the reading center. Methods: Echocardiographers from the 6 ELSA-Brasil study investigation centers measured the left ventricular mass online during the acquisition from 124 studies before transmitting to the reading center, where studies were read according to the study protocol. Half of these studies were blindly read by a second reader in the reading center. Results: From the 124 echocardiograms, 5 (4%) were considered not measurable. Among the remaining 119, 72 (61%) were women, mean age was 50.2 ± 7.0 years and 2 had structural myocardial abnormalities. Images were considered to be optimal/ good by the reading center for 110 (92.4%) cases. No significant difference existed between online and offline measurements (1,29 g, CI 95% −3.60-6.19), and the intraclass correlation coefficient between them was 0.79 (CI 95% 0.71-0.85). For images read by two readers, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86 (CI 95% 0.78-0.91). Conclusion: There were no significant drifts between online and offline left ventricular mass measurements, and reproducibility was similar to that described in previous studies. Central quantitative assessment of echocardiographic studies in reading centers, as performed in the ELSA-Brasil study, is feasible and useful in clinical and epidemiological studies performed in our setting.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015000200003
work_keys_str_mv AT tognonalexandrepereira reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT foppamurilo reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT luftviviancristine reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT chamblesslloydellwood reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT lotufopaulo reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT elaouarliliamariamameri reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT fernandeslucianapereira reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
AT duncanbrucebartholow reproducibilityofleftventricularmassbyechocardiogramintheelsabrasil
_version_ 1756381950297243648