Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma

INTRODUCTION: The management of splenic injuries has shifted from splenectomy to splenic preservation owing to the risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). This study aimed to identify the factors that determine splenectomy in patients with isolated splenic injuries, with a view to increasing the rate of splenic preservation. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Files of 55 patients managed for isolated splenic injuries from blunt abdominal trauma between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively analysed using a pro forma. Management options were classified into nonoperative, operative salvage and splenectomy. RESULTS: The majority of patients suffered splenic injury as a result of motor vehicle accident (MVA) trauma or falls. Splenectomy was undertaken in 33 (60%) patients, 12 (22%) had non-operative management, and operative salvage was achieved in 10 (18%) patients. Significant determinants of splenectomy were grade of splenic injury, hierarchy of the surgeon, and hierarchy of the assistant. DISCUSSION: MVA injury and falls accounted for the vast majority of blunt abdominal trauma in this study. The rate and magnitude of energy transferred versus splenic protective mechanisms at the time of blunt abdominal trauma seems to determine the grade of splenic injury. Interest in splenic salvage surgery, availability of technology that enables splenic salvage surgery, and the experience of the surgeon and assistant appear to determine the surgical management. CONCLUSION: Legislation on vehicle safety and good parental control may reduce the severity of splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma. When surgery is indicated, salvage surgery should be considered in intermediate isolated splenic injury to reduce the incidence of OPSI.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akinkuolie,A. A., Lawal,O. O., Arowolo,O. A., Agbakwuru,E. A., Adesunkanmi,A. R. K.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Association of Surgeons of South Africa 2010
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23612010000100005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0038-23612010000100005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0038-236120100001000052014-09-18Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal traumaAkinkuolie,A. A.Lawal,O. O.Arowolo,O. A.Agbakwuru,E. A.Adesunkanmi,A. R. K.INTRODUCTION: The management of splenic injuries has shifted from splenectomy to splenic preservation owing to the risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). This study aimed to identify the factors that determine splenectomy in patients with isolated splenic injuries, with a view to increasing the rate of splenic preservation. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Files of 55 patients managed for isolated splenic injuries from blunt abdominal trauma between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively analysed using a pro forma. Management options were classified into nonoperative, operative salvage and splenectomy. RESULTS: The majority of patients suffered splenic injury as a result of motor vehicle accident (MVA) trauma or falls. Splenectomy was undertaken in 33 (60%) patients, 12 (22%) had non-operative management, and operative salvage was achieved in 10 (18%) patients. Significant determinants of splenectomy were grade of splenic injury, hierarchy of the surgeon, and hierarchy of the assistant. DISCUSSION: MVA injury and falls accounted for the vast majority of blunt abdominal trauma in this study. The rate and magnitude of energy transferred versus splenic protective mechanisms at the time of blunt abdominal trauma seems to determine the grade of splenic injury. Interest in splenic salvage surgery, availability of technology that enables splenic salvage surgery, and the experience of the surgeon and assistant appear to determine the surgical management. CONCLUSION: Legislation on vehicle safety and good parental control may reduce the severity of splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma. When surgery is indicated, salvage surgery should be considered in intermediate isolated splenic injury to reduce the incidence of OPSI.Association of Surgeons of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Surgery v.48 n.1 20102010-02-01journal articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23612010000100005en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Sudáfrica
countrycode ZA
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-za
tag revista
region África del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Akinkuolie,A. A.
Lawal,O. O.
Arowolo,O. A.
Agbakwuru,E. A.
Adesunkanmi,A. R. K.
spellingShingle Akinkuolie,A. A.
Lawal,O. O.
Arowolo,O. A.
Agbakwuru,E. A.
Adesunkanmi,A. R. K.
Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
author_facet Akinkuolie,A. A.
Lawal,O. O.
Arowolo,O. A.
Agbakwuru,E. A.
Adesunkanmi,A. R. K.
author_sort Akinkuolie,A. A.
title Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
title_short Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
title_full Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
title_fullStr Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
title_sort determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma
description INTRODUCTION: The management of splenic injuries has shifted from splenectomy to splenic preservation owing to the risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). This study aimed to identify the factors that determine splenectomy in patients with isolated splenic injuries, with a view to increasing the rate of splenic preservation. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Files of 55 patients managed for isolated splenic injuries from blunt abdominal trauma between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively analysed using a pro forma. Management options were classified into nonoperative, operative salvage and splenectomy. RESULTS: The majority of patients suffered splenic injury as a result of motor vehicle accident (MVA) trauma or falls. Splenectomy was undertaken in 33 (60%) patients, 12 (22%) had non-operative management, and operative salvage was achieved in 10 (18%) patients. Significant determinants of splenectomy were grade of splenic injury, hierarchy of the surgeon, and hierarchy of the assistant. DISCUSSION: MVA injury and falls accounted for the vast majority of blunt abdominal trauma in this study. The rate and magnitude of energy transferred versus splenic protective mechanisms at the time of blunt abdominal trauma seems to determine the grade of splenic injury. Interest in splenic salvage surgery, availability of technology that enables splenic salvage surgery, and the experience of the surgeon and assistant appear to determine the surgical management. CONCLUSION: Legislation on vehicle safety and good parental control may reduce the severity of splenic injury in blunt abdominal trauma. When surgery is indicated, salvage surgery should be considered in intermediate isolated splenic injury to reduce the incidence of OPSI.
publisher Association of Surgeons of South Africa
publishDate 2010
url http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23612010000100005
work_keys_str_mv AT akinkuolieaa determinantsofsplenectomyinsplenicinjuriesfollowingbluntabdominaltrauma
AT lawaloo determinantsofsplenectomyinsplenicinjuriesfollowingbluntabdominaltrauma
AT arowolooa determinantsofsplenectomyinsplenicinjuriesfollowingbluntabdominaltrauma
AT agbakwuruea determinantsofsplenectomyinsplenicinjuriesfollowingbluntabdominaltrauma
AT adesunkanmiark determinantsofsplenectomyinsplenicinjuriesfollowingbluntabdominaltrauma
_version_ 1756004954979434496