Quantitative ultrasound and bone health

This review of quantiative ultrasound (QUS) and bone health uses the current literature to summarise the clinical and research effectiveness of QUS. QUS has been demonstrated to have the ability to predict fracture, particularly at the hip. However, the magnitude of prediction is fracture-site, measurement-site and device dependent. The correlations between dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone mineral density (BMD) are weak to moderate, resulting in different subjects being identified as being at risk of fracture by the two different methods. QUS is sensitive to age and menopause-related changes and to clinical risk factors and lifestyle factors associated with osteoporosis. Whilst a limited ability of QUS to monitor therapeutic intervention has been demonstrated, this is still an area where it's poorer precision, in comparison to DXA, results in limited applicability. Whilst DXA remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, QUS may be of use for the prediction of those at risk of future fracture in areas where there is limited availability of DXA.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Knapp,Karen M
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública 2009
Online Access:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342009000700005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0036-36342009000700005
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0036-363420090007000052009-09-01Quantitative ultrasound and bone healthKnapp,Karen M osteoporosis ultrasound bone density fracture This review of quantiative ultrasound (QUS) and bone health uses the current literature to summarise the clinical and research effectiveness of QUS. QUS has been demonstrated to have the ability to predict fracture, particularly at the hip. However, the magnitude of prediction is fracture-site, measurement-site and device dependent. The correlations between dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone mineral density (BMD) are weak to moderate, resulting in different subjects being identified as being at risk of fracture by the two different methods. QUS is sensitive to age and menopause-related changes and to clinical risk factors and lifestyle factors associated with osteoporosis. Whilst a limited ability of QUS to monitor therapeutic intervention has been demonstrated, this is still an area where it's poorer precision, in comparison to DXA, results in limited applicability. Whilst DXA remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, QUS may be of use for the prediction of those at risk of future fracture in areas where there is limited availability of DXA.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaSalud Pública de México v.51 suppl.1 20092009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342009000700005en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country México
countrycode MX
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-mx
tag revista
region America del Norte
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Knapp,Karen M
spellingShingle Knapp,Karen M
Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
author_facet Knapp,Karen M
author_sort Knapp,Karen M
title Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
title_short Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
title_full Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
title_fullStr Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative ultrasound and bone health
title_sort quantitative ultrasound and bone health
description This review of quantiative ultrasound (QUS) and bone health uses the current literature to summarise the clinical and research effectiveness of QUS. QUS has been demonstrated to have the ability to predict fracture, particularly at the hip. However, the magnitude of prediction is fracture-site, measurement-site and device dependent. The correlations between dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone mineral density (BMD) are weak to moderate, resulting in different subjects being identified as being at risk of fracture by the two different methods. QUS is sensitive to age and menopause-related changes and to clinical risk factors and lifestyle factors associated with osteoporosis. Whilst a limited ability of QUS to monitor therapeutic intervention has been demonstrated, this is still an area where it's poorer precision, in comparison to DXA, results in limited applicability. Whilst DXA remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, QUS may be of use for the prediction of those at risk of future fracture in areas where there is limited availability of DXA.
publisher Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
publishDate 2009
url http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36342009000700005
work_keys_str_mv AT knappkarenm quantitativeultrasoundandbonehealth
_version_ 1756220216773181440