Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study

Abstract Background and objectives: To assess the agreement between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site with the epidural depths estimated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scanning. Methods: Fifty patients of either sex, scheduled for L4‒5 lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective observational study, and the results of 49 patients were analyzed. The actual epidural depth was measured from the surgical site with a sterile surgical scale. The MRI-derived epidural depth was measured from the MRI scan. The ultrasound estimated epidural depth was measured from the ultrasound image obtained just before surgery. Results: The mean epidural depth measured from the surgical site was 53.80 ± 7.67 mm, the mean MRI-derived epidural depth was 54.06 ± 7.36 mm, and the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 53.77 ± 7.94 mm. The correlation between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site and MRI-derived epidural depth was 0.989 (r2 = 0.979, p < 0.001), and the corresponding correlation with the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 0.990 (r2 = 0.980, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both ultrasound-estimated epidural depth and MRI-derived epidural depth have a strong correlation with the epidural depth measured from the surgical site. Preprocedural MRI-derived estimates of epidural depth are slightly deeper than the epidural depth measured from the surgical site, and the ultrasound estimated epidural depths are somewhat shallower. Although both radiologic imaging techniques provided reliable preprocedural estimates of the actual epidural depth, the loss of resistance technique cannot be discarded while inserting epidural needles.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cantürk,Mehmet, Kocaoğlu,Nazan, Hakki,Meltem
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0034-70942020000300248
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-709420200003002482020-09-09Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational studyCantürk,MehmetKocaoğlu,NazanHakki,Meltem Epidural Anesthesia Ultrasound Magnetic resonance imaging Intraoperative Abstract Background and objectives: To assess the agreement between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site with the epidural depths estimated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scanning. Methods: Fifty patients of either sex, scheduled for L4‒5 lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective observational study, and the results of 49 patients were analyzed. The actual epidural depth was measured from the surgical site with a sterile surgical scale. The MRI-derived epidural depth was measured from the MRI scan. The ultrasound estimated epidural depth was measured from the ultrasound image obtained just before surgery. Results: The mean epidural depth measured from the surgical site was 53.80 ± 7.67 mm, the mean MRI-derived epidural depth was 54.06 ± 7.36 mm, and the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 53.77 ± 7.94 mm. The correlation between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site and MRI-derived epidural depth was 0.989 (r2 = 0.979, p < 0.001), and the corresponding correlation with the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 0.990 (r2 = 0.980, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both ultrasound-estimated epidural depth and MRI-derived epidural depth have a strong correlation with the epidural depth measured from the surgical site. Preprocedural MRI-derived estimates of epidural depth are slightly deeper than the epidural depth measured from the surgical site, and the ultrasound estimated epidural depths are somewhat shallower. Although both radiologic imaging techniques provided reliable preprocedural estimates of the actual epidural depth, the loss of resistance technique cannot be discarded while inserting epidural needles.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.3 20202020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300248en10.1016/j.bjane.2020.06.003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Cantürk,Mehmet
Kocaoğlu,Nazan
Hakki,Meltem
spellingShingle Cantürk,Mehmet
Kocaoğlu,Nazan
Hakki,Meltem
Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
author_facet Cantürk,Mehmet
Kocaoğlu,Nazan
Hakki,Meltem
author_sort Cantürk,Mehmet
title Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
title_short Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
title_full Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
title_fullStr Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by MRI or US: an observational study
title_sort correlation of the epidural space measured intraoperatively and estimated by mri or us: an observational study
description Abstract Background and objectives: To assess the agreement between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site with the epidural depths estimated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scanning. Methods: Fifty patients of either sex, scheduled for L4‒5 lumbar disc surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective observational study, and the results of 49 patients were analyzed. The actual epidural depth was measured from the surgical site with a sterile surgical scale. The MRI-derived epidural depth was measured from the MRI scan. The ultrasound estimated epidural depth was measured from the ultrasound image obtained just before surgery. Results: The mean epidural depth measured from the surgical site was 53.80 ± 7.67 mm, the mean MRI-derived epidural depth was 54.06 ± 7.36 mm, and the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 53.77 ± 7.94 mm. The correlation between the epidural depth measured from the surgical site and MRI-derived epidural depth was 0.989 (r2 = 0.979, p < 0.001), and the corresponding correlation with the ultrasound-estimated epidural depth was 0.990 (r2 = 0.980, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both ultrasound-estimated epidural depth and MRI-derived epidural depth have a strong correlation with the epidural depth measured from the surgical site. Preprocedural MRI-derived estimates of epidural depth are slightly deeper than the epidural depth measured from the surgical site, and the ultrasound estimated epidural depths are somewhat shallower. Although both radiologic imaging techniques provided reliable preprocedural estimates of the actual epidural depth, the loss of resistance technique cannot be discarded while inserting epidural needles.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000300248
work_keys_str_mv AT canturkmehmet correlationoftheepiduralspacemeasuredintraoperativelyandestimatedbymriorusanobservationalstudy
AT kocaoglunazan correlationoftheepiduralspacemeasuredintraoperativelyandestimatedbymriorusanobservationalstudy
AT hakkimeltem correlationoftheepiduralspacemeasuredintraoperativelyandestimatedbymriorusanobservationalstudy
_version_ 1756376394306158592