Sub-Sentential Logical Form. On Robert J. Stainton's Words and Thoughts
Summary Stainton argues (2006, 2001) that since sub-sentential speech acts lack the proper syntactic structure to have logical form, it is not from them that sub-sententially propositions conveyed derive their logical form. In this brief comment, I develop an argument for the claim that sub-sentential speech acts not only do have the proper syntactic structure, but that according to Stainton's own general pragmatic account of sub-sentential speech, they also satisfy all the criteria put forward by him to be the primary bearers of logical form.
Saved in:
Main Author: | Barceló Aspeitia,Axel Arturo |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas
2011
|
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-15032011000300053 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Speech Acts And Sub-Sentential Speech
by: Thompson,J. Robert
Published: (2011) -
Sentential complementation in spanish /
by: Subirats Rèuggeberg, Carlos 17421
Published: (1987) - Miller, Robert J.
-
Trans-World Causation Revisited
by: Barceló Aspeitia,Axel Arturo
Published: (2014) -
ON THE MUTABILITY OF CHRIST
by: BARCELÓ ASPEITIA,AXEL ARTURO
Published: (2021)