BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Polypectomy of colorectal polyps is the mainstay of colorectal cancer prevention. Identification of the best polypectomy technique is imperative. OBJECTIVE: This review aims at comparing efficacy of nine different resection methods for small colorectal polyps (<10 mm). METHODS: We searched and selected only randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome was complete resection rates of small polyps by histological eradication. Secondary outcomes were: adverse events, retrieval tissue failures rates and duration of procedure. RESULTS: Eighteen trials including 3215 patients and 5223 polyps were analysed. Overall, cold polypectomy had a significantly shorter time of procedure than hot polypectomy (RD -5.92, 95%CI -9.90 to -1.94, P<0.05), with no statistical difference on complete histological eradication (RD 0.08, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.19, P>0.05). Regarding cold polypectomy techniques, cold snare was found superior to cold forceps on complete and en-bloc resection rates and less time consuming. When comparing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hot-snare and cold-snare, the latter showed no-inferiority on histological eradication, adverse events or retrieval tissue failure rates. CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is the best technique for resection of small colorectal polyps. Among cold methods, dedicated cold snare was found superior on histological eradication. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection might be considered an option for polyps from 5 to 9 mm.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TRANQUILLINI,Caio Vinicius, BERNARDO,Wanderley Marques, BRUNALDI,Vitor Ottoboni, MOURA,Eduardo Turiani de, MARQUES,Sergio Barbosa, MOURA,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032018002400358
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-28032018002400358
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-280320180024003582019-02-11BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSISTRANQUILLINI,Caio ViniciusBERNARDO,Wanderley MarquesBRUNALDI,Vitor OttoboniMOURA,Eduardo Turiani deMARQUES,Sergio BarbosaMOURA,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Colonic polyps, surgery Endoscopic mucosal resection Follow-up studies ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Polypectomy of colorectal polyps is the mainstay of colorectal cancer prevention. Identification of the best polypectomy technique is imperative. OBJECTIVE: This review aims at comparing efficacy of nine different resection methods for small colorectal polyps (<10 mm). METHODS: We searched and selected only randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome was complete resection rates of small polyps by histological eradication. Secondary outcomes were: adverse events, retrieval tissue failures rates and duration of procedure. RESULTS: Eighteen trials including 3215 patients and 5223 polyps were analysed. Overall, cold polypectomy had a significantly shorter time of procedure than hot polypectomy (RD -5.92, 95%CI -9.90 to -1.94, P<0.05), with no statistical difference on complete histological eradication (RD 0.08, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.19, P>0.05). Regarding cold polypectomy techniques, cold snare was found superior to cold forceps on complete and en-bloc resection rates and less time consuming. When comparing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hot-snare and cold-snare, the latter showed no-inferiority on histological eradication, adverse events or retrieval tissue failure rates. CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is the best technique for resection of small colorectal polyps. Among cold methods, dedicated cold snare was found superior on histological eradication. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection might be considered an option for polyps from 5 to 9 mm.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.55 n.4 20182018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032018002400358en10.1590/s0004-2803.201800000-79
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author TRANQUILLINI,Caio Vinicius
BERNARDO,Wanderley Marques
BRUNALDI,Vitor Ottoboni
MOURA,Eduardo Turiani de
MARQUES,Sergio Barbosa
MOURA,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de
spellingShingle TRANQUILLINI,Caio Vinicius
BERNARDO,Wanderley Marques
BRUNALDI,Vitor Ottoboni
MOURA,Eduardo Turiani de
MARQUES,Sergio Barbosa
MOURA,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de
BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
author_facet TRANQUILLINI,Caio Vinicius
BERNARDO,Wanderley Marques
BRUNALDI,Vitor Ottoboni
MOURA,Eduardo Turiani de
MARQUES,Sergio Barbosa
MOURA,Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de
author_sort TRANQUILLINI,Caio Vinicius
title BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_short BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_full BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_fullStr BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
title_sort best polypectomy technique for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Polypectomy of colorectal polyps is the mainstay of colorectal cancer prevention. Identification of the best polypectomy technique is imperative. OBJECTIVE: This review aims at comparing efficacy of nine different resection methods for small colorectal polyps (<10 mm). METHODS: We searched and selected only randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome was complete resection rates of small polyps by histological eradication. Secondary outcomes were: adverse events, retrieval tissue failures rates and duration of procedure. RESULTS: Eighteen trials including 3215 patients and 5223 polyps were analysed. Overall, cold polypectomy had a significantly shorter time of procedure than hot polypectomy (RD -5.92, 95%CI -9.90 to -1.94, P<0.05), with no statistical difference on complete histological eradication (RD 0.08, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.19, P>0.05). Regarding cold polypectomy techniques, cold snare was found superior to cold forceps on complete and en-bloc resection rates and less time consuming. When comparing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hot-snare and cold-snare, the latter showed no-inferiority on histological eradication, adverse events or retrieval tissue failure rates. CONCLUSION: Cold polypectomy is the best technique for resection of small colorectal polyps. Among cold methods, dedicated cold snare was found superior on histological eradication. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection might be considered an option for polyps from 5 to 9 mm.
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032018002400358
work_keys_str_mv AT tranquillinicaiovinicius bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bernardowanderleymarques bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT brunaldivitorottoboni bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mouraeduardoturianide bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marquessergiobarbosa bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mouraeduardoguimaraeshourneauxde bestpolypectomytechniqueforsmallanddiminutivecolorectalpolypsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1756373565984210944