Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model

CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established modality for excision of sessile lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Submucosal fluid injection creates a cushion and may prevent thermal injury and perforation. OBJECTIVES: This blind study investigated the performance of three different solutions to create submucosal fluid cushions in porcine stomach. METHODS: Three solutions were injected in the stomach of nine pigs BR1: normal saline solution, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25%. In each pig, submucosal injections with 6 mL per test-solution were performed. One drop of methylene blue was added to all injections for better visualization. The time for the bleb to disappear was recorded. RESULTS: The overall median time of visible submucosal cushion was 37 minutes (range 12-60 min) for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 31 minutes for carboxymethylcellulose (range 10-43 min) and 19 minutes for normal saline solution (range 8-37 min). There was no statistically significant difference neither between normal saline solution and carboxymethylcellulose (P = 0.146) nor carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (P = 0.119) but the median duration of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was significantly longer than normal saline solution (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The length of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose submucosal fluid cushion is longer in comparison with normal saline solution. The median time for carboxymethylcellulose was not longer than normal saline solution. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, in the concentration of 0.25%, may be a durable alternative for submucosal injection.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lenz,Luciano, Di Sena,Veruska, Nakao,Frank S., Andrade,Gustavo Paulo de, Rohr,Maria Rachel da Silveira, Ferrari Jr,Angelo Paulo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0004-28032010000200013
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0004-280320100002000132010-09-22Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine modelLenz,LucianoDi Sena,VeruskaNakao,Frank S.Andrade,Gustavo Paulo deRohr,Maria Rachel da SilveiraFerrari Jr,Angelo Paulo Endoscopy, digestive system Gastrointestinal neoplasms Saline solution, hypertonic Carboxymethylcellulose Methylcellulose Swine CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established modality for excision of sessile lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Submucosal fluid injection creates a cushion and may prevent thermal injury and perforation. OBJECTIVES: This blind study investigated the performance of three different solutions to create submucosal fluid cushions in porcine stomach. METHODS: Three solutions were injected in the stomach of nine pigs BR1: normal saline solution, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25%. In each pig, submucosal injections with 6 mL per test-solution were performed. One drop of methylene blue was added to all injections for better visualization. The time for the bleb to disappear was recorded. RESULTS: The overall median time of visible submucosal cushion was 37 minutes (range 12-60 min) for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 31 minutes for carboxymethylcellulose (range 10-43 min) and 19 minutes for normal saline solution (range 8-37 min). There was no statistically significant difference neither between normal saline solution and carboxymethylcellulose (P = 0.146) nor carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (P = 0.119) but the median duration of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was significantly longer than normal saline solution (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The length of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose submucosal fluid cushion is longer in comparison with normal saline solution. The median time for carboxymethylcellulose was not longer than normal saline solution. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, in the concentration of 0.25%, may be a durable alternative for submucosal injection.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia v.47 n.2 20102010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200013en10.1590/S0004-28032010000200013
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lenz,Luciano
Di Sena,Veruska
Nakao,Frank S.
Andrade,Gustavo Paulo de
Rohr,Maria Rachel da Silveira
Ferrari Jr,Angelo Paulo
spellingShingle Lenz,Luciano
Di Sena,Veruska
Nakao,Frank S.
Andrade,Gustavo Paulo de
Rohr,Maria Rachel da Silveira
Ferrari Jr,Angelo Paulo
Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
author_facet Lenz,Luciano
Di Sena,Veruska
Nakao,Frank S.
Andrade,Gustavo Paulo de
Rohr,Maria Rachel da Silveira
Ferrari Jr,Angelo Paulo
author_sort Lenz,Luciano
title Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
title_short Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
title_full Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
title_fullStr Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
title_sort comparative results of gastric submucosal injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and normal saline solution in a porcine model
description CONTEXT: Endoscopic mucosal resection is an established modality for excision of sessile lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Submucosal fluid injection creates a cushion and may prevent thermal injury and perforation. OBJECTIVES: This blind study investigated the performance of three different solutions to create submucosal fluid cushions in porcine stomach. METHODS: Three solutions were injected in the stomach of nine pigs BR1: normal saline solution, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25%. In each pig, submucosal injections with 6 mL per test-solution were performed. One drop of methylene blue was added to all injections for better visualization. The time for the bleb to disappear was recorded. RESULTS: The overall median time of visible submucosal cushion was 37 minutes (range 12-60 min) for hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 31 minutes for carboxymethylcellulose (range 10-43 min) and 19 minutes for normal saline solution (range 8-37 min). There was no statistically significant difference neither between normal saline solution and carboxymethylcellulose (P = 0.146) nor carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (P = 0.119) but the median duration of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose was significantly longer than normal saline solution (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The length of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose submucosal fluid cushion is longer in comparison with normal saline solution. The median time for carboxymethylcellulose was not longer than normal saline solution. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, in the concentration of 0.25%, may be a durable alternative for submucosal injection.
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia e Outras Especialidades - IBEPEGE.
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-28032010000200013
work_keys_str_mv AT lenzluciano comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
AT disenaveruska comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
AT nakaofranks comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
AT andradegustavopaulode comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
AT rohrmariaracheldasilveira comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
AT ferrarijrangelopaulo comparativeresultsofgastricsubmucosalinjectionwithhydroxypropylmethylcellulosecarboxymethylcelluloseandnormalsalinesolutioninaporcinemodel
_version_ 1756373476230299648