Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase

Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZIMMER,FERNANDO, GALLI,GABRIELA M., MARCON,HIAM J., ALBA,DAVI F., GRISS,LUIZ, MURAMATSU,KEYSUKE, SILVA,ALEKSANDRO S. DA, PAIANO,DIOVANI
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S0001-37652022000601317
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S0001-376520220006013172023-01-20Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phaseZIMMER,FERNANDOGALLI,GABRIELA M.MARCON,HIAM J.ALBA,DAVI F.GRISS,LUIZMURAMATSU,KEYSUKESILVA,ALEKSANDRO S. DAPAIANO,DIOVANI behavior feeder litter piglet handling Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcademia Brasileira de CiênciasAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.94 n.4 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317en10.1590/0001-3765202220201500
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author ZIMMER,FERNANDO
GALLI,GABRIELA M.
MARCON,HIAM J.
ALBA,DAVI F.
GRISS,LUIZ
MURAMATSU,KEYSUKE
SILVA,ALEKSANDRO S. DA
PAIANO,DIOVANI
spellingShingle ZIMMER,FERNANDO
GALLI,GABRIELA M.
MARCON,HIAM J.
ALBA,DAVI F.
GRISS,LUIZ
MURAMATSU,KEYSUKE
SILVA,ALEKSANDRO S. DA
PAIANO,DIOVANI
Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
author_facet ZIMMER,FERNANDO
GALLI,GABRIELA M.
MARCON,HIAM J.
ALBA,DAVI F.
GRISS,LUIZ
MURAMATSU,KEYSUKE
SILVA,ALEKSANDRO S. DA
PAIANO,DIOVANI
author_sort ZIMMER,FERNANDO
title Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_short Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_full Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_fullStr Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_full_unstemmed Different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
title_sort different protocols for piglet creep feeding in the farrowing stage and residual effects in the nursery phase
description Abstract This study was aimed at the effects of different Creep-feeding protocols on piglet performance and its residual effects during the nursery phase. Experimental design used was five groups: WC (without creep); DCF (dry creep feeding); WCF (wet creep feeding); LD (additional liquid creep with automatic feed dispenser plus DCF); and LLF (additional liquid creep with linear feeder plus DCF). Ten litters per treatment were selected a total 50 sows and 645 piglets. During the first two weeks of lactation, the LD treatment (2.61 and 4.20 kg) promoted greater body weight (P <0.001) than the DCF (2.55 and 3.93 kg), (WFS) (2.43 and 3.69 kg) and LLF (2.50 and 4.00 kg) treatments, but did not differ from the WC treatment (2.68 and 4.09 kg). At weaning, the WC (5.22 kg), LD (5.32 kg) and LLF (5.27 kg) treatments gave higher body weights (P <0.001) when compared to the DCF (4.97 kg) and WCF (4.69 kg) treatments. We concluded that there was no change in the behavior of the piglets, and the use of dry feed with liquid supplements did not improve weight gain. The different creep feeding systems did not influence the weight and performance of the piglets in the nursery phase.
publisher Academia Brasileira de Ciências
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652022000601317
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmerfernando differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT galligabrielam differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT marconhiamj differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT albadavif differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT grissluiz differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT muramatsukeysuke differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT silvaaleksandrosda differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
AT paianodiovani differentprotocolsforpigletcreepfeedinginthefarrowingstageandresidualeffectsinthenurseryphase
_version_ 1756472598040936448