Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning

Parasitoids searching for polyphagous herbivores can find their hosts in a variety of habitats. Under this scenario, chemical cues from the host habitat (not related to the host) represent poor indicators of host location. Hence, it is unlikely that naïve females show a strong response to host habitat cues, which would become important only if the parasitoids learn to associate such cues to the host presence. This concept does not consider that habitats can vary in profitability or host nutritional quality, which according to the optimal foraging theory and the preference-performance hypothesis (respectively) could shape the way in which parasitoids make use of chemical cues from the host habitat. We assessed innate preference in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata among chemical cues from four host habitats (apple, fig, orange and peach) using a Y-tube olfactometer. Contrary to what was predicted, we found a hierarchic pattern of preference. The parasitism rate realized on these fruit species and the weight of the host correlates positively, to some extent, with the preference pattern, whereas preference did not correlate with survival and fecundity of the progeny. As expected for a parasitoid foraging for generalist hosts, habitat preference changed markedly depending on their previous experience and the abundance of hosts. These findings suggest that the pattern of preference for host habitats is attributable to differences in encounter rate and host quality. Host habitat preference seems to be, however, quite plastic and easily modified according to the information obtained during foraging.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Segura, Diego Fernando, Nussenbaum, Ana Laura, Viscarret, Mariana Mabel, Devescovi, Francisco, Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique, Corley, Juan Carlos, Ovruski Alderete, Sergio Marcelo, Cladera, Jorge Luis
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:Plagas de Plantas, Parasitoides, Biosteres Longicaudatus, Huéspedes, Pest of Plants, Parasitoids, Hosts, Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/789
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152222&type=printable
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152222
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-789
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Plagas de Plantas
Parasitoides
Biosteres Longicaudatus
Huéspedes
Pest of Plants
Parasitoids
Hosts
Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
Plagas de Plantas
Parasitoides
Biosteres Longicaudatus
Huéspedes
Pest of Plants
Parasitoids
Hosts
Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
spellingShingle Plagas de Plantas
Parasitoides
Biosteres Longicaudatus
Huéspedes
Pest of Plants
Parasitoids
Hosts
Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
Plagas de Plantas
Parasitoides
Biosteres Longicaudatus
Huéspedes
Pest of Plants
Parasitoids
Hosts
Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
Segura, Diego Fernando
Nussenbaum, Ana Laura
Viscarret, Mariana Mabel
Devescovi, Francisco
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Corley, Juan Carlos
Ovruski Alderete, Sergio Marcelo
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
description Parasitoids searching for polyphagous herbivores can find their hosts in a variety of habitats. Under this scenario, chemical cues from the host habitat (not related to the host) represent poor indicators of host location. Hence, it is unlikely that naïve females show a strong response to host habitat cues, which would become important only if the parasitoids learn to associate such cues to the host presence. This concept does not consider that habitats can vary in profitability or host nutritional quality, which according to the optimal foraging theory and the preference-performance hypothesis (respectively) could shape the way in which parasitoids make use of chemical cues from the host habitat. We assessed innate preference in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata among chemical cues from four host habitats (apple, fig, orange and peach) using a Y-tube olfactometer. Contrary to what was predicted, we found a hierarchic pattern of preference. The parasitism rate realized on these fruit species and the weight of the host correlates positively, to some extent, with the preference pattern, whereas preference did not correlate with survival and fecundity of the progeny. As expected for a parasitoid foraging for generalist hosts, habitat preference changed markedly depending on their previous experience and the abundance of hosts. These findings suggest that the pattern of preference for host habitats is attributable to differences in encounter rate and host quality. Host habitat preference seems to be, however, quite plastic and easily modified according to the information obtained during foraging.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
topic_facet Plagas de Plantas
Parasitoides
Biosteres Longicaudatus
Huéspedes
Pest of Plants
Parasitoids
Hosts
Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata
author Segura, Diego Fernando
Nussenbaum, Ana Laura
Viscarret, Mariana Mabel
Devescovi, Francisco
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Corley, Juan Carlos
Ovruski Alderete, Sergio Marcelo
Cladera, Jorge Luis
author_facet Segura, Diego Fernando
Nussenbaum, Ana Laura
Viscarret, Mariana Mabel
Devescovi, Francisco
Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique
Corley, Juan Carlos
Ovruski Alderete, Sergio Marcelo
Cladera, Jorge Luis
author_sort Segura, Diego Fernando
title Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
title_short Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
title_full Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
title_fullStr Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
title_full_unstemmed Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning
title_sort innate host habitat preference in the parasitoid diachasmimorpha longicaudata: functional significance and modifications through learning
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/789
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152222&type=printable
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152222
work_keys_str_mv AT seguradiegofernando innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT nussenbaumanalaura innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT viscarretmarianamabel innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT devescovifrancisco innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT bachmannguillermoenrique innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT corleyjuancarlos innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT ovruskialderetesergiomarcelo innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
AT claderajorgeluis innatehosthabitatpreferenceintheparasitoiddiachasmimorphalongicaudatafunctionalsignificanceandmodificationsthroughlearning
_version_ 1756006939155759104
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-7892019-03-15T15:24:11Z Innate Host Habitat Preference in the Parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata: Functional Significance and Modifications through Learning Segura, Diego Fernando Nussenbaum, Ana Laura Viscarret, Mariana Mabel Devescovi, Francisco Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique Corley, Juan Carlos Ovruski Alderete, Sergio Marcelo Cladera, Jorge Luis Plagas de Plantas Parasitoides Biosteres Longicaudatus Huéspedes Pest of Plants Parasitoids Hosts Diachasmimorpha Longicaudata Parasitoids searching for polyphagous herbivores can find their hosts in a variety of habitats. Under this scenario, chemical cues from the host habitat (not related to the host) represent poor indicators of host location. Hence, it is unlikely that naïve females show a strong response to host habitat cues, which would become important only if the parasitoids learn to associate such cues to the host presence. This concept does not consider that habitats can vary in profitability or host nutritional quality, which according to the optimal foraging theory and the preference-performance hypothesis (respectively) could shape the way in which parasitoids make use of chemical cues from the host habitat. We assessed innate preference in the fruit fly parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata among chemical cues from four host habitats (apple, fig, orange and peach) using a Y-tube olfactometer. Contrary to what was predicted, we found a hierarchic pattern of preference. The parasitism rate realized on these fruit species and the weight of the host correlates positively, to some extent, with the preference pattern, whereas preference did not correlate with survival and fecundity of the progeny. As expected for a parasitoid foraging for generalist hosts, habitat preference changed markedly depending on their previous experience and the abundance of hosts. These findings suggest that the pattern of preference for host habitats is attributable to differences in encounter rate and host quality. Host habitat preference seems to be, however, quite plastic and easily modified according to the information obtained during foraging. Inst. de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola IMyZA Fil: Segura, Diego Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Nussenbaum, Ana Laura. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Viscarret, Mariana Mabel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola. Insectario de Investigaciones para Lucha Biológica; Argentina Fil: Devescovi, Francisco. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Bachmann, Guillermo Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Corley, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina Fil: Ovruski, Sergio Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucuman. Planta Piloto de Procesos Industriales Microbiologicos; Argentina Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina 2017-07-26T16:55:44Z 2017-07-26T16:55:44Z 2016 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/789 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152222&type=printable https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152222 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess application/pdf PLoS ONE 11 (3) : e0152222