How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide

Background: The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed of evidence generated during the covid-19 pandemic accentuated the challenges of managing high volumes of research literature. Methods: In this article, we summarise the characteristics of ongoing living systematic reviews on covid-19, and we follow a life cycle approach to describe key steps in a living systematic review. Results: We identified 97 living systematic reviews on covid-19, published up to 7th November 2022, which focused mostly on the effects of pharmacological interventions (n = 46, 47%) or the prevalence of associated conditions or risk factors (n = 30, 31%). The scopes of several reviews overlapped considerably. Most living systematic reviews included both observational and randomised study designs (n = 45, 46%). Only one-third of the reviews has been updated at least once (n = 34, 35%). We address practical aspects of living systematic reviews including how to judge whether to start a living systematic review, methods for study identification and selection, data extraction and evaluation, and give recommendations at each step, drawing from our own experience. We also discuss when it is time to stop and how to publish updates. Conclusions: Methods to improve the efficiency of searching, study selection, and data extraction using machine learning technologies are being developed, their performance and applicability, particularly for reviews based on observational study designs should improve, and ways of publishing living systematic reviews and their updates will continue to evolve. Finally, knowing when to end a living systematic review is as important as knowing when to start.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heron, Leonie, Buitrago-Garcia, Diana, Ipekci, Aziz Mert, Baumann, Rico, Imeri, Hira, Salanti, Georgia, Counotte, Michel Jacques, Low, Nicola
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Covid-19, Epidemiology, Public health, Research design,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/how-to-update-a-living-systematic-review-and-keep-it-alive-during
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-619017
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-6190172024-12-04 Heron, Leonie Buitrago-Garcia, Diana Ipekci, Aziz Mert Baumann, Rico Imeri, Hira Salanti, Georgia Counotte, Michel Jacques Low, Nicola Article/Letter to editor Systematic Reviews 12 (2023) 1 ISSN: 2046-4053 How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide 2023 Background: The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed of evidence generated during the covid-19 pandemic accentuated the challenges of managing high volumes of research literature. Methods: In this article, we summarise the characteristics of ongoing living systematic reviews on covid-19, and we follow a life cycle approach to describe key steps in a living systematic review. Results: We identified 97 living systematic reviews on covid-19, published up to 7th November 2022, which focused mostly on the effects of pharmacological interventions (n = 46, 47%) or the prevalence of associated conditions or risk factors (n = 30, 31%). The scopes of several reviews overlapped considerably. Most living systematic reviews included both observational and randomised study designs (n = 45, 46%). Only one-third of the reviews has been updated at least once (n = 34, 35%). We address practical aspects of living systematic reviews including how to judge whether to start a living systematic review, methods for study identification and selection, data extraction and evaluation, and give recommendations at each step, drawing from our own experience. We also discuss when it is time to stop and how to publish updates. Conclusions: Methods to improve the efficiency of searching, study selection, and data extraction using machine learning technologies are being developed, their performance and applicability, particularly for reviews based on observational study designs should improve, and ways of publishing living systematic reviews and their updates will continue to evolve. Finally, knowing when to end a living systematic review is as important as knowing when to start. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/how-to-update-a-living-systematic-review-and-keep-it-alive-during 10.1186/s13643-023-02325-y https://edepot.wur.nl/638613 Covid-19 Epidemiology Public health Research design https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Covid-19
Epidemiology
Public health
Research design
Covid-19
Epidemiology
Public health
Research design
spellingShingle Covid-19
Epidemiology
Public health
Research design
Covid-19
Epidemiology
Public health
Research design
Heron, Leonie
Buitrago-Garcia, Diana
Ipekci, Aziz Mert
Baumann, Rico
Imeri, Hira
Salanti, Georgia
Counotte, Michel Jacques
Low, Nicola
How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
description Background: The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed of evidence generated during the covid-19 pandemic accentuated the challenges of managing high volumes of research literature. Methods: In this article, we summarise the characteristics of ongoing living systematic reviews on covid-19, and we follow a life cycle approach to describe key steps in a living systematic review. Results: We identified 97 living systematic reviews on covid-19, published up to 7th November 2022, which focused mostly on the effects of pharmacological interventions (n = 46, 47%) or the prevalence of associated conditions or risk factors (n = 30, 31%). The scopes of several reviews overlapped considerably. Most living systematic reviews included both observational and randomised study designs (n = 45, 46%). Only one-third of the reviews has been updated at least once (n = 34, 35%). We address practical aspects of living systematic reviews including how to judge whether to start a living systematic review, methods for study identification and selection, data extraction and evaluation, and give recommendations at each step, drawing from our own experience. We also discuss when it is time to stop and how to publish updates. Conclusions: Methods to improve the efficiency of searching, study selection, and data extraction using machine learning technologies are being developed, their performance and applicability, particularly for reviews based on observational study designs should improve, and ways of publishing living systematic reviews and their updates will continue to evolve. Finally, knowing when to end a living systematic review is as important as knowing when to start.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Covid-19
Epidemiology
Public health
Research design
author Heron, Leonie
Buitrago-Garcia, Diana
Ipekci, Aziz Mert
Baumann, Rico
Imeri, Hira
Salanti, Georgia
Counotte, Michel Jacques
Low, Nicola
author_facet Heron, Leonie
Buitrago-Garcia, Diana
Ipekci, Aziz Mert
Baumann, Rico
Imeri, Hira
Salanti, Georgia
Counotte, Michel Jacques
Low, Nicola
author_sort Heron, Leonie
title How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
title_short How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
title_full How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
title_fullStr How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
title_full_unstemmed How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
title_sort how to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: : a practical guide
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/how-to-update-a-living-systematic-review-and-keep-it-alive-during
work_keys_str_mv AT heronleonie howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT buitragogarciadiana howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT ipekciazizmert howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT baumannrico howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT imerihira howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT salantigeorgia howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT counottemicheljacques howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
AT lownicola howtoupdatealivingsystematicreviewandkeepitaliveduringapandemicapracticalguide
_version_ 1819141352239136768