Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach

FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung, Martin, Schwalm, Christopher, Migliavacca, Mirco, Walther, Sophia, Camps-Valls, Gustau, Koirala, Sujan, Anthoni, Peter, Besnard, Simon, Bodesheim, Paul, Carvalhais, Nuno, Chevallier, Frederic, Gans, Fabian, Goll, Daniel S., Haverd, Vanessa, Köhler, Philipp, Ichii, Kazuhito, Jain, Atul K., Liu, Junzhi, Lombardozzi, Danica, Nabel, Julia E.M.S., Nelson, Jacob A., O'Sullivan, Michael, Pallandt, Martijn, Papale, Dario, Peters, Wouter, Pongratz, Julia, Rödenbeck, Christian, Sitch, Stephen, Tramontana, Gianluca, Walker, Anthony, Weber, Ulrich, Reichstein, Markus
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:Life Science,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-563495
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5634952024-12-04 Jung, Martin Schwalm, Christopher Migliavacca, Mirco Walther, Sophia Camps-Valls, Gustau Koirala, Sujan Anthoni, Peter Besnard, Simon Bodesheim, Paul Carvalhais, Nuno Chevallier, Frederic Gans, Fabian Goll, Daniel S. Haverd, Vanessa Köhler, Philipp Ichii, Kazuhito Jain, Atul K. Liu, Junzhi Lombardozzi, Danica Nabel, Julia E.M.S. Nelson, Jacob A. O'Sullivan, Michael Pallandt, Martijn Papale, Dario Peters, Wouter Pongratz, Julia Rödenbeck, Christian Sitch, Stephen Tramontana, Gianluca Walker, Anthony Weber, Ulrich Reichstein, Markus Article/Letter to editor Biogeosciences 17 (2020) 5 ISSN: 1726-4170 Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach 2020 FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes 10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020 https://edepot.wur.nl/520085 Life Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Life Science
Life Science
spellingShingle Life Science
Life Science
Jung, Martin
Schwalm, Christopher
Migliavacca, Mirco
Walther, Sophia
Camps-Valls, Gustau
Koirala, Sujan
Anthoni, Peter
Besnard, Simon
Bodesheim, Paul
Carvalhais, Nuno
Chevallier, Frederic
Gans, Fabian
Goll, Daniel S.
Haverd, Vanessa
Köhler, Philipp
Ichii, Kazuhito
Jain, Atul K.
Liu, Junzhi
Lombardozzi, Danica
Nabel, Julia E.M.S.
Nelson, Jacob A.
O'Sullivan, Michael
Pallandt, Martijn
Papale, Dario
Peters, Wouter
Pongratz, Julia
Rödenbeck, Christian
Sitch, Stephen
Tramontana, Gianluca
Walker, Anthony
Weber, Ulrich
Reichstein, Markus
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
description FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet Life Science
author Jung, Martin
Schwalm, Christopher
Migliavacca, Mirco
Walther, Sophia
Camps-Valls, Gustau
Koirala, Sujan
Anthoni, Peter
Besnard, Simon
Bodesheim, Paul
Carvalhais, Nuno
Chevallier, Frederic
Gans, Fabian
Goll, Daniel S.
Haverd, Vanessa
Köhler, Philipp
Ichii, Kazuhito
Jain, Atul K.
Liu, Junzhi
Lombardozzi, Danica
Nabel, Julia E.M.S.
Nelson, Jacob A.
O'Sullivan, Michael
Pallandt, Martijn
Papale, Dario
Peters, Wouter
Pongratz, Julia
Rödenbeck, Christian
Sitch, Stephen
Tramontana, Gianluca
Walker, Anthony
Weber, Ulrich
Reichstein, Markus
author_facet Jung, Martin
Schwalm, Christopher
Migliavacca, Mirco
Walther, Sophia
Camps-Valls, Gustau
Koirala, Sujan
Anthoni, Peter
Besnard, Simon
Bodesheim, Paul
Carvalhais, Nuno
Chevallier, Frederic
Gans, Fabian
Goll, Daniel S.
Haverd, Vanessa
Köhler, Philipp
Ichii, Kazuhito
Jain, Atul K.
Liu, Junzhi
Lombardozzi, Danica
Nabel, Julia E.M.S.
Nelson, Jacob A.
O'Sullivan, Michael
Pallandt, Martijn
Papale, Dario
Peters, Wouter
Pongratz, Julia
Rödenbeck, Christian
Sitch, Stephen
Tramontana, Gianluca
Walker, Anthony
Weber, Ulrich
Reichstein, Markus
author_sort Jung, Martin
title Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
title_short Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
title_full Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
title_fullStr Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
title_full_unstemmed Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
title_sort scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : synthesis and evaluation of the fluxcom approach
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes
work_keys_str_mv AT jungmartin scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT schwalmchristopher scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT migliavaccamirco scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT walthersophia scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT campsvallsgustau scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT koiralasujan scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT anthonipeter scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT besnardsimon scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT bodesheimpaul scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT carvalhaisnuno scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT chevallierfrederic scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT gansfabian scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT golldaniels scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT haverdvanessa scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT kohlerphilipp scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT ichiikazuhito scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT jainatulk scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT liujunzhi scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT lombardozzidanica scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT nabeljuliaems scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT nelsonjacoba scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT osullivanmichael scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT pallandtmartijn scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT papaledario scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT peterswouter scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT pongratzjulia scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT rodenbeckchristian scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT sitchstephen scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT tramontanagianluca scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT walkeranthony scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT weberulrich scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
AT reichsteinmarkus scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach
_version_ 1819144632356831232