Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach
FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article/Letter to editor biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | Life Science, |
Online Access: | https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-563495 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5634952024-12-04 Jung, Martin Schwalm, Christopher Migliavacca, Mirco Walther, Sophia Camps-Valls, Gustau Koirala, Sujan Anthoni, Peter Besnard, Simon Bodesheim, Paul Carvalhais, Nuno Chevallier, Frederic Gans, Fabian Goll, Daniel S. Haverd, Vanessa Köhler, Philipp Ichii, Kazuhito Jain, Atul K. Liu, Junzhi Lombardozzi, Danica Nabel, Julia E.M.S. Nelson, Jacob A. O'Sullivan, Michael Pallandt, Martijn Papale, Dario Peters, Wouter Pongratz, Julia Rödenbeck, Christian Sitch, Stephen Tramontana, Gianluca Walker, Anthony Weber, Ulrich Reichstein, Markus Article/Letter to editor Biogeosciences 17 (2020) 5 ISSN: 1726-4170 Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach 2020 FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes 10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020 https://edepot.wur.nl/520085 Life Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research |
institution |
WUR NL |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Países bajos |
countrycode |
NL |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-wur-nl |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
WUR Library Netherlands |
language |
English |
topic |
Life Science Life Science |
spellingShingle |
Life Science Life Science Jung, Martin Schwalm, Christopher Migliavacca, Mirco Walther, Sophia Camps-Valls, Gustau Koirala, Sujan Anthoni, Peter Besnard, Simon Bodesheim, Paul Carvalhais, Nuno Chevallier, Frederic Gans, Fabian Goll, Daniel S. Haverd, Vanessa Köhler, Philipp Ichii, Kazuhito Jain, Atul K. Liu, Junzhi Lombardozzi, Danica Nabel, Julia E.M.S. Nelson, Jacob A. O'Sullivan, Michael Pallandt, Martijn Papale, Dario Peters, Wouter Pongratz, Julia Rödenbeck, Christian Sitch, Stephen Tramontana, Gianluca Walker, Anthony Weber, Ulrich Reichstein, Markus Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
description |
FLUXNET comprises globally distributed eddy-covariance-based estimates of carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Since eddy covariance flux towers have a relatively small footprint and are distributed unevenly across the world, upscaling the observations is necessary to obtain global-scale estimates of biosphere-atmosphere exchange. Based on cross-consistency checks with atmospheric inversions, sun-induced fluorescence (SIF) and dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), here we provide a systematic assessment of the latest upscaling efforts for gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the FLUXCOM initiative, where different machine learning methods, forcing data sets and sets of predictor variables were employed. Spatial patterns of mean GPP are consistent across FLUXCOM and DGVM ensembles ( at 1 spatial resolution) while the majority of DGVMs show, for 70 of the land surface, values outside the FLUXCOM range. Global mean GPP magnitudes for 2008-2010 from FLUXCOM members vary within 106 and 130 PgC class with the largest uncertainty in the tropics. Seasonal variations in independent SIF estimates agree better with FLUXCOM GPP (mean global pixel-wise) than with GPP from DGVMs (mean global pixel-wise). Seasonal variations in FLUXCOM NEE show good consistency with atmospheric inversion-based net land carbon fluxes, particularly for temperate and boreal regions. Interannual variability of global NEE in FLUXCOM is underestimated compared to inversions and DGVMs. The FLUXCOM version which also uses meteorological inputs shows a strong co-variation in interannual patterns with inversions (for 2001-2010). Mean regional NEE from FLUXCOM shows larger uptake than inversion and DGVM-based estimates, particularly in the tropics with discrepancies of up to several hundred grammes of carbon per square metre per year. These discrepancies can only partly be reconciled by carbon loss pathways that are implicit in inversions but not captured by the flux tower measurements such as carbon emissions from fires and water bodies. We hypothesize that a combination of systematic biases in the underlying eddy covariance data, in particular in tall tropical forests, and a lack of site history effects on NEE in FLUXCOM are likely responsible for the too strong tropical carbon sink estimated by FLUXCOM. Furthermore, as FLUXCOM does not account for fertilization effects, carbon flux trends are not realistic. Overall, current FLUXCOM estimates of mean annual and seasonal cycles of GPP as well as seasonal NEE variations provide useful constraints of global carbon cycling, while interannual variability patterns from FLUXCOM are valuable but require cautious interpretation. Exploring the diversity of Earth observation data and of machine learning concepts along with improved quality and quantity of flux tower measurements will facilitate further improvements of the FLUXCOM approach overall. |
format |
Article/Letter to editor |
topic_facet |
Life Science |
author |
Jung, Martin Schwalm, Christopher Migliavacca, Mirco Walther, Sophia Camps-Valls, Gustau Koirala, Sujan Anthoni, Peter Besnard, Simon Bodesheim, Paul Carvalhais, Nuno Chevallier, Frederic Gans, Fabian Goll, Daniel S. Haverd, Vanessa Köhler, Philipp Ichii, Kazuhito Jain, Atul K. Liu, Junzhi Lombardozzi, Danica Nabel, Julia E.M.S. Nelson, Jacob A. O'Sullivan, Michael Pallandt, Martijn Papale, Dario Peters, Wouter Pongratz, Julia Rödenbeck, Christian Sitch, Stephen Tramontana, Gianluca Walker, Anthony Weber, Ulrich Reichstein, Markus |
author_facet |
Jung, Martin Schwalm, Christopher Migliavacca, Mirco Walther, Sophia Camps-Valls, Gustau Koirala, Sujan Anthoni, Peter Besnard, Simon Bodesheim, Paul Carvalhais, Nuno Chevallier, Frederic Gans, Fabian Goll, Daniel S. Haverd, Vanessa Köhler, Philipp Ichii, Kazuhito Jain, Atul K. Liu, Junzhi Lombardozzi, Danica Nabel, Julia E.M.S. Nelson, Jacob A. O'Sullivan, Michael Pallandt, Martijn Papale, Dario Peters, Wouter Pongratz, Julia Rödenbeck, Christian Sitch, Stephen Tramontana, Gianluca Walker, Anthony Weber, Ulrich Reichstein, Markus |
author_sort |
Jung, Martin |
title |
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
title_short |
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
title_full |
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
title_fullStr |
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : Synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach |
title_sort |
scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe : synthesis and evaluation of the fluxcom approach |
url |
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scaling-carbon-fluxes-from-eddy-covariance-sites-to-globe-synthes |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jungmartin scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT schwalmchristopher scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT migliavaccamirco scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT walthersophia scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT campsvallsgustau scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT koiralasujan scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT anthonipeter scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT besnardsimon scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT bodesheimpaul scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT carvalhaisnuno scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT chevallierfrederic scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT gansfabian scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT golldaniels scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT haverdvanessa scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT kohlerphilipp scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT ichiikazuhito scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT jainatulk scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT liujunzhi scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT lombardozzidanica scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT nabeljuliaems scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT nelsonjacoba scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT osullivanmichael scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT pallandtmartijn scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT papaledario scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT peterswouter scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT pongratzjulia scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT rodenbeckchristian scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT sitchstephen scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT tramontanagianluca scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT walkeranthony scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT weberulrich scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach AT reichsteinmarkus scalingcarbonfluxesfromeddycovariancesitestoglobesynthesisandevaluationofthefluxcomapproach |
_version_ |
1819144632356831232 |