Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest

The digital era has brought new and exciting changes to scholarly communication. Modern scientific libraries and information infrastructures are obliged to face these new challenges in a professional way sooner rather than later.The monitoring and execution of policies, the facilitation of Open Access publishing, and support for research data management are but a few examples of adaptation to the digital era. The use of scholarly metrics is also an emerging field for academic libraries, brought on by digital change. To foster this vision, LIBER's Innovative Metrics Working Group has set out recommendations on how academic libraries and information infrastructures can deal with scholarly metrics, and how to get started with the development of services to support this.The recommendations are grouped into four sections:- Discovery and Discoverability- Showcasing Achievements- Service Development- Research AssessmentEach section covers a set of activities, and makes suggestions for libraries which want to promote the transparent, standardized and responsible use of scholarly metrics. As part of LIBER’s focus on Open Science, the Working Group has placed a special emphasis on recommendations addressing open scholarly metrics. Throughout this report, we have organised our recommendations into three levels. Which recommendations a library adopts will depend on their current level of engagement with scholarly metrics. The levels are as follows:- Initial Steps (circular bullet)- Intermediate Steps (square bullet)- Advanced Steps (triangular bullet)The order in which the recommendations appear are in correlation with the potential importance they can have for an institution. These two indications of use were developed during the Working Group’s workshop during LIBER’s 2017 Annual Conference. They are there to assist in prioritizing, but are not mandatory to follow and are not dependent on each other.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coombs, S., Peters, I., Schmidt, B., Princic, A., Martinez, M., Kraker, P., Jahn, N., Haustein, S., Cornée, N., Abcouwer, K., Gorraiz, J., Fest, P.M.J., Tsakonas, G.
Format: External research report biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Liber
Subjects:Life Science,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scholarly-metrics-recommendations-for-research-libraries-decipher
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-539659
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5396592024-01-05 Coombs, S. Peters, I. Schmidt, B. Princic, A. Martinez, M. Kraker, P. Jahn, N. Haustein, S. Cornée, N. Abcouwer, K. Gorraiz, J. Fest, P.M.J. Tsakonas, G. External research report Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest 2018 The digital era has brought new and exciting changes to scholarly communication. Modern scientific libraries and information infrastructures are obliged to face these new challenges in a professional way sooner rather than later.The monitoring and execution of policies, the facilitation of Open Access publishing, and support for research data management are but a few examples of adaptation to the digital era. The use of scholarly metrics is also an emerging field for academic libraries, brought on by digital change. To foster this vision, LIBER's Innovative Metrics Working Group has set out recommendations on how academic libraries and information infrastructures can deal with scholarly metrics, and how to get started with the development of services to support this.The recommendations are grouped into four sections:- Discovery and Discoverability- Showcasing Achievements- Service Development- Research AssessmentEach section covers a set of activities, and makes suggestions for libraries which want to promote the transparent, standardized and responsible use of scholarly metrics. As part of LIBER’s focus on Open Science, the Working Group has placed a special emphasis on recommendations addressing open scholarly metrics. Throughout this report, we have organised our recommendations into three levels. Which recommendations a library adopts will depend on their current level of engagement with scholarly metrics. The levels are as follows:- Initial Steps (circular bullet)- Intermediate Steps (square bullet)- Advanced Steps (triangular bullet)The order in which the recommendations appear are in correlation with the potential importance they can have for an institution. These two indications of use were developed during the Working Group’s workshop during LIBER’s 2017 Annual Conference. They are there to assist in prioritizing, but are not mandatory to follow and are not dependent on each other. en Liber application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scholarly-metrics-recommendations-for-research-libraries-decipher 10.5281/zenodo.1289830 https://edepot.wur.nl/457534 Life Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic Life Science
Life Science
spellingShingle Life Science
Life Science
Coombs, S.
Peters, I.
Schmidt, B.
Princic, A.
Martinez, M.
Kraker, P.
Jahn, N.
Haustein, S.
Cornée, N.
Abcouwer, K.
Gorraiz, J.
Fest, P.M.J.
Tsakonas, G.
Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
description The digital era has brought new and exciting changes to scholarly communication. Modern scientific libraries and information infrastructures are obliged to face these new challenges in a professional way sooner rather than later.The monitoring and execution of policies, the facilitation of Open Access publishing, and support for research data management are but a few examples of adaptation to the digital era. The use of scholarly metrics is also an emerging field for academic libraries, brought on by digital change. To foster this vision, LIBER's Innovative Metrics Working Group has set out recommendations on how academic libraries and information infrastructures can deal with scholarly metrics, and how to get started with the development of services to support this.The recommendations are grouped into four sections:- Discovery and Discoverability- Showcasing Achievements- Service Development- Research AssessmentEach section covers a set of activities, and makes suggestions for libraries which want to promote the transparent, standardized and responsible use of scholarly metrics. As part of LIBER’s focus on Open Science, the Working Group has placed a special emphasis on recommendations addressing open scholarly metrics. Throughout this report, we have organised our recommendations into three levels. Which recommendations a library adopts will depend on their current level of engagement with scholarly metrics. The levels are as follows:- Initial Steps (circular bullet)- Intermediate Steps (square bullet)- Advanced Steps (triangular bullet)The order in which the recommendations appear are in correlation with the potential importance they can have for an institution. These two indications of use were developed during the Working Group’s workshop during LIBER’s 2017 Annual Conference. They are there to assist in prioritizing, but are not mandatory to follow and are not dependent on each other.
format External research report
topic_facet Life Science
author Coombs, S.
Peters, I.
Schmidt, B.
Princic, A.
Martinez, M.
Kraker, P.
Jahn, N.
Haustein, S.
Cornée, N.
Abcouwer, K.
Gorraiz, J.
Fest, P.M.J.
Tsakonas, G.
author_facet Coombs, S.
Peters, I.
Schmidt, B.
Princic, A.
Martinez, M.
Kraker, P.
Jahn, N.
Haustein, S.
Cornée, N.
Abcouwer, K.
Gorraiz, J.
Fest, P.M.J.
Tsakonas, G.
author_sort Coombs, S.
title Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
title_short Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
title_full Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
title_fullStr Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
title_full_unstemmed Scholarly Metrics Recommendations for Research Libraries: Deciphering the trees in the forest
title_sort scholarly metrics recommendations for research libraries: deciphering the trees in the forest
publisher Liber
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/scholarly-metrics-recommendations-for-research-libraries-decipher
work_keys_str_mv AT coombss scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT petersi scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT schmidtb scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT princica scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT martinezm scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT krakerp scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT jahnn scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT hausteins scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT corneen scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT abcouwerk scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT gorraizj scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT festpmj scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
AT tsakonasg scholarlymetricsrecommendationsforresearchlibrariesdecipheringthetreesintheforest
_version_ 1813198596747558912