Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil

Low productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gil, Juliana D.B., Garrett, Rachael D., Rotz, Alan, Daioglou, Vassilis, Valentim, Judson, Pires, Gabrielle F., Costa, Marcos H., Lopes, Luciano, Reis, Julio C.
Format: Article/Letter to editor biblioteca
Language:English
Subjects:climate scenarios, integrated crop-livestock systems, low carbon agriculture, pasture intensification, sustainability,
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/tradeoffs-in-the-quest-for-climate-smart-agricultural-intensifica
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-539611
record_format koha
spelling dig-wur-nl-wurpubs-5396112025-01-17 Gil, Juliana D.B. Garrett, Rachael D. Rotz, Alan Daioglou, Vassilis Valentim, Judson Pires, Gabrielle F. Costa, Marcos H. Lopes, Luciano Reis, Julio C. Article/Letter to editor Environmental Research Letters 13 (2018) 6 ISSN: 1748-9326 Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil 2018 Low productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy. en application/pdf https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/tradeoffs-in-the-quest-for-climate-smart-agricultural-intensifica 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4d1 https://edepot.wur.nl/457098 climate scenarios integrated crop-livestock systems low carbon agriculture pasture intensification sustainability https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wageningen University & Research
institution WUR NL
collection DSpace
country Países bajos
countrycode NL
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-wur-nl
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname WUR Library Netherlands
language English
topic climate scenarios
integrated crop-livestock systems
low carbon agriculture
pasture intensification
sustainability
climate scenarios
integrated crop-livestock systems
low carbon agriculture
pasture intensification
sustainability
spellingShingle climate scenarios
integrated crop-livestock systems
low carbon agriculture
pasture intensification
sustainability
climate scenarios
integrated crop-livestock systems
low carbon agriculture
pasture intensification
sustainability
Gil, Juliana D.B.
Garrett, Rachael D.
Rotz, Alan
Daioglou, Vassilis
Valentim, Judson
Pires, Gabrielle F.
Costa, Marcos H.
Lopes, Luciano
Reis, Julio C.
Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
description Low productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy.
format Article/Letter to editor
topic_facet climate scenarios
integrated crop-livestock systems
low carbon agriculture
pasture intensification
sustainability
author Gil, Juliana D.B.
Garrett, Rachael D.
Rotz, Alan
Daioglou, Vassilis
Valentim, Judson
Pires, Gabrielle F.
Costa, Marcos H.
Lopes, Luciano
Reis, Julio C.
author_facet Gil, Juliana D.B.
Garrett, Rachael D.
Rotz, Alan
Daioglou, Vassilis
Valentim, Judson
Pires, Gabrielle F.
Costa, Marcos H.
Lopes, Luciano
Reis, Julio C.
author_sort Gil, Juliana D.B.
title Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
title_short Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
title_full Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
title_fullStr Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil
title_sort tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in mato grosso, brazil
url https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/tradeoffs-in-the-quest-for-climate-smart-agricultural-intensifica
work_keys_str_mv AT giljulianadb tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT garrettrachaeld tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT rotzalan tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT daioglouvassilis tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT valentimjudson tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT piresgabriellef tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT costamarcosh tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT lopesluciano tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
AT reisjulioc tradeoffsinthequestforclimatesmartagriculturalintensificationinmatogrossobrazil
_version_ 1822269535114231808