Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union

US federal transfers to individuals are large, countercyclical, vary geographically, and are often credited for helping stabilize regional economies. This paper estimates the short-run effects of these transfers using plausibly exogenous regional variation in temporary stimulus packages and earlier permanent Social Security increases. States that received larger transfers tended to grow faster contemporaneously, with a multiplier of around 1.5 for permanent transfers and 1/3 for temporary transfers. Results are broadly consistent with an open-economy New Keynesian model. At business-cycle frequencies, cross-region transfer multipliers are not large, suggesting only modest gains in regional stabilization from US federal automatic stabilizers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pennings, Steven
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2020-05
Subjects:FISCAL MULTIPLIER, FISCAL TRANSFER, MONETARY UNION, FEDERAL TRANSFERS, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, STIMULUS PACKAGE, NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL, REGIONAL STABILIZATION, CORONAVIRUS, COVID-19, PANDEMIC RESPONSE, COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/486411589304789870/Cross-Region-Transfers-in-a-Monetary-Union-Evidence-from-the-US-and-Some-Implications
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/33756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098633756
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986337562024-07-28T06:08:21Z Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union Evidence from the US and Some Implications Pennings, Steven FISCAL MULTIPLIER FISCAL TRANSFER MONETARY UNION FEDERAL TRANSFERS REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STIMULUS PACKAGE NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL REGIONAL STABILIZATION CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PANDEMIC RESPONSE COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY US federal transfers to individuals are large, countercyclical, vary geographically, and are often credited for helping stabilize regional economies. This paper estimates the short-run effects of these transfers using plausibly exogenous regional variation in temporary stimulus packages and earlier permanent Social Security increases. States that received larger transfers tended to grow faster contemporaneously, with a multiplier of around 1.5 for permanent transfers and 1/3 for temporary transfers. Results are broadly consistent with an open-economy New Keynesian model. At business-cycle frequencies, cross-region transfer multipliers are not large, suggesting only modest gains in regional stabilization from US federal automatic stabilizers. 2020-05-14T21:03:13Z 2020-05-14T21:03:13Z 2020-05 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/486411589304789870/Cross-Region-Transfers-in-a-Monetary-Union-Evidence-from-the-US-and-Some-Implications https://hdl.handle.net/10986/33756 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 9244 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic FISCAL MULTIPLIER
FISCAL TRANSFER
MONETARY UNION
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STIMULUS PACKAGE
NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
REGIONAL STABILIZATION
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC RESPONSE
COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY
FISCAL MULTIPLIER
FISCAL TRANSFER
MONETARY UNION
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STIMULUS PACKAGE
NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
REGIONAL STABILIZATION
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC RESPONSE
COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY
spellingShingle FISCAL MULTIPLIER
FISCAL TRANSFER
MONETARY UNION
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STIMULUS PACKAGE
NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
REGIONAL STABILIZATION
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC RESPONSE
COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY
FISCAL MULTIPLIER
FISCAL TRANSFER
MONETARY UNION
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STIMULUS PACKAGE
NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
REGIONAL STABILIZATION
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC RESPONSE
COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY
Pennings, Steven
Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
description US federal transfers to individuals are large, countercyclical, vary geographically, and are often credited for helping stabilize regional economies. This paper estimates the short-run effects of these transfers using plausibly exogenous regional variation in temporary stimulus packages and earlier permanent Social Security increases. States that received larger transfers tended to grow faster contemporaneously, with a multiplier of around 1.5 for permanent transfers and 1/3 for temporary transfers. Results are broadly consistent with an open-economy New Keynesian model. At business-cycle frequencies, cross-region transfer multipliers are not large, suggesting only modest gains in regional stabilization from US federal automatic stabilizers.
format Working Paper
topic_facet FISCAL MULTIPLIER
FISCAL TRANSFER
MONETARY UNION
FEDERAL TRANSFERS
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
STIMULUS PACKAGE
NEW KEYNESIAN MODEL
REGIONAL STABILIZATION
CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC RESPONSE
COUNTERCYCLICAL POLICY
author Pennings, Steven
author_facet Pennings, Steven
author_sort Pennings, Steven
title Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
title_short Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
title_full Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
title_fullStr Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Region Transfers in a Monetary Union
title_sort cross-region transfers in a monetary union
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2020-05
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/486411589304789870/Cross-Region-Transfers-in-a-Monetary-Union-Evidence-from-the-US-and-Some-Implications
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/33756
work_keys_str_mv AT penningssteven crossregiontransfersinamonetaryunion
AT penningssteven evidencefromtheusandsomeimplications
_version_ 1806032526033027072