Buses, Houses or Cash?

Transit subsidies in the urban area of Buenos Aires are high, amounting to a total of US$5 billion for 2012. They have been challenged on several counts: suspected of driving urban sprawl and associated infrastructure costs, diverting resources from system maintenance, and failing to reach the poor among others. In this context, this paper examines the impacts of cost recovery fares under a range of different policy scenarios that could cushion the impact of fare increases. The alternative scenarios that are scrutinized are the uncompensated removal of the transit subsidy, its replacement by a lump sum transfer, and its replacement by two different construction subsidy schemes. Using a dynamic urban model (NEDUM-2D) calibrated for the urban area of Buenos Aires, all scenarios are assessed along four dimensions: (i) the efficiency/welfare impact on residents, (ii) the impacts on the internal structure of the urban area and sprawl, (iii) the impact on commuting-related carbon dioxide emissions, and (iv) the redistributive impacts, with a focus on the poorest households. A series of results emerge. First, there are consumption-related welfare gains for residents associated with replacing the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer. Second, there are only moderate reductions in urbanization over time and thus infrastructure costs associated with the subsidy removal. Third, the replacement of the transit subsidy leads to only moderate increases in carbon dioxide emissions despite lower public transport mode shares, because households will chose to settle closer to jobs, thereby reducing commuting distances. Finally, the replacement of the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer will lead to short-term harsh redistributive impacts for captive transit users in some areas of the urban area. Medium-term adjustments of land and housing prices will partially mitigate the negative impacts of higher transport costs for tenants, but will further hurt homeowners.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Avner, Paolo, Mehndiratta, Shomik Raj, Viguie, Vincent, Hallegatte, Stephane
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2017-08
Subjects:TRANSIT SUBSIDY, CASH TRANSFERS, CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES, LAND USE, URBANIZATION, HOUSEHOLD WELFARE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/889761502738189524/Buses-houses-or-cash-socio-economic-spatial-and-environmental-consequences-of-reforming-public-transport-subsidies-in-Buenos-Aires
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27973
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098627973
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986279732024-06-23T08:22:15Z Buses, Houses or Cash? Socio-Economic, Spatial and Environmental Consequences of Reforming Public Transport Subsidies in Buenos Aires Avner, Paolo Mehndiratta, Shomik Raj Viguie, Vincent Hallegatte, Stephane Avner, Paolo TRANSIT SUBSIDY CASH TRANSFERS CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES LAND USE URBANIZATION HOUSEHOLD WELFARE Transit subsidies in the urban area of Buenos Aires are high, amounting to a total of US$5 billion for 2012. They have been challenged on several counts: suspected of driving urban sprawl and associated infrastructure costs, diverting resources from system maintenance, and failing to reach the poor among others. In this context, this paper examines the impacts of cost recovery fares under a range of different policy scenarios that could cushion the impact of fare increases. The alternative scenarios that are scrutinized are the uncompensated removal of the transit subsidy, its replacement by a lump sum transfer, and its replacement by two different construction subsidy schemes. Using a dynamic urban model (NEDUM-2D) calibrated for the urban area of Buenos Aires, all scenarios are assessed along four dimensions: (i) the efficiency/welfare impact on residents, (ii) the impacts on the internal structure of the urban area and sprawl, (iii) the impact on commuting-related carbon dioxide emissions, and (iv) the redistributive impacts, with a focus on the poorest households. A series of results emerge. First, there are consumption-related welfare gains for residents associated with replacing the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer. Second, there are only moderate reductions in urbanization over time and thus infrastructure costs associated with the subsidy removal. Third, the replacement of the transit subsidy leads to only moderate increases in carbon dioxide emissions despite lower public transport mode shares, because households will chose to settle closer to jobs, thereby reducing commuting distances. Finally, the replacement of the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer will lead to short-term harsh redistributive impacts for captive transit users in some areas of the urban area. Medium-term adjustments of land and housing prices will partially mitigate the negative impacts of higher transport costs for tenants, but will further hurt homeowners. 2017-08-24T21:30:32Z 2017-08-24T21:30:32Z 2017-08 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/889761502738189524/Buses-houses-or-cash-socio-economic-spatial-and-environmental-consequences-of-reforming-public-transport-subsidies-in-Buenos-Aires https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27973 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8166 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic TRANSIT SUBSIDY
CASH TRANSFERS
CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES
LAND USE
URBANIZATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
TRANSIT SUBSIDY
CASH TRANSFERS
CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES
LAND USE
URBANIZATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
spellingShingle TRANSIT SUBSIDY
CASH TRANSFERS
CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES
LAND USE
URBANIZATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
TRANSIT SUBSIDY
CASH TRANSFERS
CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES
LAND USE
URBANIZATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
Avner, Paolo
Mehndiratta, Shomik Raj
Viguie, Vincent
Hallegatte, Stephane
Avner, Paolo
Buses, Houses or Cash?
description Transit subsidies in the urban area of Buenos Aires are high, amounting to a total of US$5 billion for 2012. They have been challenged on several counts: suspected of driving urban sprawl and associated infrastructure costs, diverting resources from system maintenance, and failing to reach the poor among others. In this context, this paper examines the impacts of cost recovery fares under a range of different policy scenarios that could cushion the impact of fare increases. The alternative scenarios that are scrutinized are the uncompensated removal of the transit subsidy, its replacement by a lump sum transfer, and its replacement by two different construction subsidy schemes. Using a dynamic urban model (NEDUM-2D) calibrated for the urban area of Buenos Aires, all scenarios are assessed along four dimensions: (i) the efficiency/welfare impact on residents, (ii) the impacts on the internal structure of the urban area and sprawl, (iii) the impact on commuting-related carbon dioxide emissions, and (iv) the redistributive impacts, with a focus on the poorest households. A series of results emerge. First, there are consumption-related welfare gains for residents associated with replacing the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer. Second, there are only moderate reductions in urbanization over time and thus infrastructure costs associated with the subsidy removal. Third, the replacement of the transit subsidy leads to only moderate increases in carbon dioxide emissions despite lower public transport mode shares, because households will chose to settle closer to jobs, thereby reducing commuting distances. Finally, the replacement of the transit subsidy by a lump sum transfer will lead to short-term harsh redistributive impacts for captive transit users in some areas of the urban area. Medium-term adjustments of land and housing prices will partially mitigate the negative impacts of higher transport costs for tenants, but will further hurt homeowners.
format Working Paper
topic_facet TRANSIT SUBSIDY
CASH TRANSFERS
CONSTRUCTION SUBSIDIES
LAND USE
URBANIZATION
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
author Avner, Paolo
Mehndiratta, Shomik Raj
Viguie, Vincent
Hallegatte, Stephane
Avner, Paolo
author_facet Avner, Paolo
Mehndiratta, Shomik Raj
Viguie, Vincent
Hallegatte, Stephane
Avner, Paolo
author_sort Avner, Paolo
title Buses, Houses or Cash?
title_short Buses, Houses or Cash?
title_full Buses, Houses or Cash?
title_fullStr Buses, Houses or Cash?
title_full_unstemmed Buses, Houses or Cash?
title_sort buses, houses or cash?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2017-08
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/889761502738189524/Buses-houses-or-cash-socio-economic-spatial-and-environmental-consequences-of-reforming-public-transport-subsidies-in-Buenos-Aires
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27973
work_keys_str_mv AT avnerpaolo buseshousesorcash
AT mehndirattashomikraj buseshousesorcash
AT viguievincent buseshousesorcash
AT hallegattestephane buseshousesorcash
AT avnerpaolo buseshousesorcash
AT avnerpaolo socioeconomicspatialandenvironmentalconsequencesofreformingpublictransportsubsidiesinbuenosaires
AT mehndirattashomikraj socioeconomicspatialandenvironmentalconsequencesofreformingpublictransportsubsidiesinbuenosaires
AT viguievincent socioeconomicspatialandenvironmentalconsequencesofreformingpublictransportsubsidiesinbuenosaires
AT hallegattestephane socioeconomicspatialandenvironmentalconsequencesofreformingpublictransportsubsidiesinbuenosaires
AT avnerpaolo socioeconomicspatialandenvironmentalconsequencesofreformingpublictransportsubsidiesinbuenosaires
_version_ 1802820812702482432