The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'

In the 2000s, global inequality fell for the first time since the Industrial Revolution, driven by a decline in the dispersion of average incomes across countries. Between 1988 and 2008, a period of rapidly increasing global integration, income growth was largest for the global top 1 percent and for country-deciles in Asia, often in the upper halves of the national distributions, while the poorer deciles in rich countries lagged behind. Although within-country inequality increased in population-weighted terms, for the average developing country the rise in inequality slowed down in the second half of the 2000s. However, like any analysis based on household surveys, these results could miss important increases in inequality if they are concentrated at the top. These data constraints remain especially serious in developing countries where only very limited information on the top tail exists, especially regarding capital incomes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lakner, Christoph
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2016-08
Subjects:income distribution, inequality, global inequality, globalization, top incomes,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/08/26624794/implications-thomas-pikettys-capital-21st-century
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24858
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098624858
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986248582024-08-07T19:52:34Z The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century' Lakner, Christoph income distribution inequality global inequality globalization top incomes In the 2000s, global inequality fell for the first time since the Industrial Revolution, driven by a decline in the dispersion of average incomes across countries. Between 1988 and 2008, a period of rapidly increasing global integration, income growth was largest for the global top 1 percent and for country-deciles in Asia, often in the upper halves of the national distributions, while the poorer deciles in rich countries lagged behind. Although within-country inequality increased in population-weighted terms, for the average developing country the rise in inequality slowed down in the second half of the 2000s. However, like any analysis based on household surveys, these results could miss important increases in inequality if they are concentrated at the top. These data constraints remain especially serious in developing countries where only very limited information on the top tail exists, especially regarding capital incomes. 2016-08-10T14:12:05Z 2016-08-10T14:12:05Z 2016-08 Working Paper Document de travail Documento de trabajo http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/08/26624794/implications-thomas-pikettys-capital-21st-century https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24858 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7776 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic income distribution
inequality
global inequality
globalization
top incomes
income distribution
inequality
global inequality
globalization
top incomes
spellingShingle income distribution
inequality
global inequality
globalization
top incomes
income distribution
inequality
global inequality
globalization
top incomes
Lakner, Christoph
The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
description In the 2000s, global inequality fell for the first time since the Industrial Revolution, driven by a decline in the dispersion of average incomes across countries. Between 1988 and 2008, a period of rapidly increasing global integration, income growth was largest for the global top 1 percent and for country-deciles in Asia, often in the upper halves of the national distributions, while the poorer deciles in rich countries lagged behind. Although within-country inequality increased in population-weighted terms, for the average developing country the rise in inequality slowed down in the second half of the 2000s. However, like any analysis based on household surveys, these results could miss important increases in inequality if they are concentrated at the top. These data constraints remain especially serious in developing countries where only very limited information on the top tail exists, especially regarding capital incomes.
format Working Paper
topic_facet income distribution
inequality
global inequality
globalization
top incomes
author Lakner, Christoph
author_facet Lakner, Christoph
author_sort Lakner, Christoph
title The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
title_short The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
title_full The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
title_fullStr The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
title_full_unstemmed The Implications of Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
title_sort implications of thomas piketty's 'capital in the 21st century'
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2016-08
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/08/26624794/implications-thomas-pikettys-capital-21st-century
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24858
work_keys_str_mv AT laknerchristoph theimplicationsofthomaspikettyscapitalinthe21stcentury
AT laknerchristoph implicationsofthomaspikettyscapitalinthe21stcentury
_version_ 1807159679396085760