Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach

Demographics, labor income, public transfers, or remittances: Which factor contributes the most to observed reductions in poverty? Using counterfactual simulations, this paper accounts for the contribution labor income has made to the observed changes in poverty over the past decade for a set of 16 countries that have experienced substantial declines in poverty. In contrast to methods that focus on aggregate summary statistics, the analysis generates entire counterfactual distributions that allow assessing the contributions of different factors to observed distributional changes. Decompositions across all possible paths are calculated so the estimates are not subject to path-dependence. The analysis shows that for most countries in the sample, labor income is the most important contributor to changes in poverty. In ten of the countries, labor income explains more than half of the change in moderate poverty; in another four, it accounts for more than 40 percent of the reduction in poverty. Although public and private transfers were relatively more important in explaining the reduction in extreme poverty, more and better-paying jobs were the key factors behind poverty reduction over the past decade.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Azevedo, Joao Pedro, Inchauste, Gabriela, Olivieri, Sergio, Saavedra, Jaime, Winkler, Hernan
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2013-04
Subjects:CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS, CASH TRANSFERS, CHANGES IN POVERTY, CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES, COUNTERFACTUAL, DECLINE IN POVERTY, DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY, DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY, DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES, ECONOMIC GROWTH, EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN, EXTREME POVERTY, FAMILY INCOME, FAMILY MEMBERS, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION, HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA, HOUSEHOLD INCOME, HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME, HOUSEHOLD SURVEY, HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS, INCOME, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, INCOME DYNAMICS, INCOME GROWTH, INCOME INEQUALITY, INEQUALITY, INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE, INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES, NUTRITION, PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION, POLITICAL ECONOMY, POOR, POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES, POVERTY DYNAMICS, POVERTY GAP, POVERTY GAP INDEX, POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE, POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES, POVERTY INCIDENCE, POVERTY MEASURES, POVERTY OUTCOMES, POVERTY RATE, POVERTY RATES, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY SEVERITY, PRIVATE TRANSFERS, REDUCTION IN POVERTY, REGIONAL POVERTY, RURAL, RURAL INCOME, SAVINGS, SOCIAL POLICIES, SOCIAL PROTECTION, TOTAL POVERTY, TRANSFER PROGRAMS, WELFARE MEASURE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/04/17599289/labor-income-responsible-poverty-reduction-decomposition-approach
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15552
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098615552
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986155522024-08-08T14:37:37Z Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach Azevedo, Joao Pedro Inchauste, Gabriela Olivieri, Sergio Saavedra, Jaime Winkler, Hernan CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS CASH TRANSFERS CHANGES IN POVERTY CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES COUNTERFACTUAL DECLINE IN POVERTY DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES ECONOMIC GROWTH EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN EXTREME POVERTY FAMILY INCOME FAMILY MEMBERS HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS INCOME INCOME DISTRIBUTION INCOME DYNAMICS INCOME GROWTH INCOME INEQUALITY INEQUALITY INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES NUTRITION PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION POLITICAL ECONOMY POOR POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES POVERTY DYNAMICS POVERTY GAP POVERTY GAP INDEX POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES POVERTY INCIDENCE POVERTY MEASURES POVERTY OUTCOMES POVERTY RATE POVERTY RATES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY SEVERITY PRIVATE TRANSFERS REDUCTION IN POVERTY REGIONAL POVERTY RURAL RURAL INCOME SAVINGS SOCIAL POLICIES SOCIAL PROTECTION TOTAL POVERTY TRANSFER PROGRAMS WELFARE MEASURE Demographics, labor income, public transfers, or remittances: Which factor contributes the most to observed reductions in poverty? Using counterfactual simulations, this paper accounts for the contribution labor income has made to the observed changes in poverty over the past decade for a set of 16 countries that have experienced substantial declines in poverty. In contrast to methods that focus on aggregate summary statistics, the analysis generates entire counterfactual distributions that allow assessing the contributions of different factors to observed distributional changes. Decompositions across all possible paths are calculated so the estimates are not subject to path-dependence. The analysis shows that for most countries in the sample, labor income is the most important contributor to changes in poverty. In ten of the countries, labor income explains more than half of the change in moderate poverty; in another four, it accounts for more than 40 percent of the reduction in poverty. Although public and private transfers were relatively more important in explaining the reduction in extreme poverty, more and better-paying jobs were the key factors behind poverty reduction over the past decade. 2013-09-04T14:59:02Z 2013-09-04T14:59:02Z 2013-04 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/04/17599289/labor-income-responsible-poverty-reduction-decomposition-approach https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15552 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6414 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
en_US
topic CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHANGES IN POVERTY
CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
COUNTERFACTUAL
DECLINE IN POVERTY
DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY
DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY
DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN
EXTREME POVERTY
FAMILY INCOME
FAMILY MEMBERS
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME DYNAMICS
INCOME GROWTH
INCOME INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES
NUTRITION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR
POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY GAP INDEX
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY RATE
POVERTY RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY SEVERITY
PRIVATE TRANSFERS
REDUCTION IN POVERTY
REGIONAL POVERTY
RURAL
RURAL INCOME
SAVINGS
SOCIAL POLICIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TOTAL POVERTY
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
WELFARE MEASURE
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHANGES IN POVERTY
CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
COUNTERFACTUAL
DECLINE IN POVERTY
DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY
DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY
DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN
EXTREME POVERTY
FAMILY INCOME
FAMILY MEMBERS
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME DYNAMICS
INCOME GROWTH
INCOME INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES
NUTRITION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR
POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY GAP INDEX
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY RATE
POVERTY RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY SEVERITY
PRIVATE TRANSFERS
REDUCTION IN POVERTY
REGIONAL POVERTY
RURAL
RURAL INCOME
SAVINGS
SOCIAL POLICIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TOTAL POVERTY
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
WELFARE MEASURE
spellingShingle CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHANGES IN POVERTY
CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
COUNTERFACTUAL
DECLINE IN POVERTY
DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY
DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY
DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN
EXTREME POVERTY
FAMILY INCOME
FAMILY MEMBERS
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME DYNAMICS
INCOME GROWTH
INCOME INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES
NUTRITION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR
POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY GAP INDEX
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY RATE
POVERTY RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY SEVERITY
PRIVATE TRANSFERS
REDUCTION IN POVERTY
REGIONAL POVERTY
RURAL
RURAL INCOME
SAVINGS
SOCIAL POLICIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TOTAL POVERTY
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
WELFARE MEASURE
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHANGES IN POVERTY
CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
COUNTERFACTUAL
DECLINE IN POVERTY
DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY
DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY
DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN
EXTREME POVERTY
FAMILY INCOME
FAMILY MEMBERS
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME DYNAMICS
INCOME GROWTH
INCOME INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES
NUTRITION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR
POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY GAP INDEX
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY RATE
POVERTY RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY SEVERITY
PRIVATE TRANSFERS
REDUCTION IN POVERTY
REGIONAL POVERTY
RURAL
RURAL INCOME
SAVINGS
SOCIAL POLICIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TOTAL POVERTY
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
WELFARE MEASURE
Azevedo, Joao Pedro
Inchauste, Gabriela
Olivieri, Sergio
Saavedra, Jaime
Winkler, Hernan
Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
description Demographics, labor income, public transfers, or remittances: Which factor contributes the most to observed reductions in poverty? Using counterfactual simulations, this paper accounts for the contribution labor income has made to the observed changes in poverty over the past decade for a set of 16 countries that have experienced substantial declines in poverty. In contrast to methods that focus on aggregate summary statistics, the analysis generates entire counterfactual distributions that allow assessing the contributions of different factors to observed distributional changes. Decompositions across all possible paths are calculated so the estimates are not subject to path-dependence. The analysis shows that for most countries in the sample, labor income is the most important contributor to changes in poverty. In ten of the countries, labor income explains more than half of the change in moderate poverty; in another four, it accounts for more than 40 percent of the reduction in poverty. Although public and private transfers were relatively more important in explaining the reduction in extreme poverty, more and better-paying jobs were the key factors behind poverty reduction over the past decade.
topic_facet CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHANGES IN POVERTY
CONSUMPTION AGGREGATE
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
COUNTERFACTUAL
DECLINE IN POVERTY
DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY
DECOMPOSITION METHODOLOGY
DECOMPOSITION TECHNIQUES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN
EXTREME POVERTY
FAMILY INCOME
FAMILY MEMBERS
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD PER CAPITA INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME DYNAMICS
INCOME GROWTH
INCOME INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINES
NUTRITION
PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POOR
POVERTY ACROSS COUNTRIES
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY GAP
POVERTY GAP INDEX
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATE
POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATES
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY RATE
POVERTY RATES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY SEVERITY
PRIVATE TRANSFERS
REDUCTION IN POVERTY
REGIONAL POVERTY
RURAL
RURAL INCOME
SAVINGS
SOCIAL POLICIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TOTAL POVERTY
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
WELFARE MEASURE
author Azevedo, Joao Pedro
Inchauste, Gabriela
Olivieri, Sergio
Saavedra, Jaime
Winkler, Hernan
author_facet Azevedo, Joao Pedro
Inchauste, Gabriela
Olivieri, Sergio
Saavedra, Jaime
Winkler, Hernan
author_sort Azevedo, Joao Pedro
title Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
title_short Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
title_full Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
title_fullStr Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
title_full_unstemmed Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach
title_sort is labor income responsible for poverty reduction? a decomposition approach
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2013-04
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/04/17599289/labor-income-responsible-poverty-reduction-decomposition-approach
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15552
work_keys_str_mv AT azevedojoaopedro islaborincomeresponsibleforpovertyreductionadecompositionapproach
AT inchaustegabriela islaborincomeresponsibleforpovertyreductionadecompositionapproach
AT olivierisergio islaborincomeresponsibleforpovertyreductionadecompositionapproach
AT saavedrajaime islaborincomeresponsibleforpovertyreductionadecompositionapproach
AT winklerhernan islaborincomeresponsibleforpovertyreductionadecompositionapproach
_version_ 1807157748615348224