Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?

Decentralization holds a lot of promise, but whether it improves public service delivery depends on the institutional arrangements governing its implementation. Several conditions must be met before the full benefits of decentralization can be reaped. First, for decentralization to increase allocative and productive efficiency, local governments need to have the authority to respond to local demand as well as adequate mechanisms for accountability. Because granting authority without accountability can lead to corruption and lower productive efficiency, decentralization needs to be accompanied by reforms that increase the transparency and accountability of local government. Second, functions need to be devolved to a low enough level of government for allocative efficiency to increase as a result of decentralization. Low-level governments are likely to be aware of local preferences and, if able to do so, are likely to adjust service delivery accordingly. Third, citizens should have channels to communicate their preferences and get their voices heard in local governments. But the existence of such channels is not enough. To effectively influence public policies and oversee local governments, citizens need to have information about government policies and activities. The media play a crucial role in this area.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kahkonen, Satu, Lanyi, Anthony
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2001-06
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, AUDITS, AUTHORITY, BUREAUCRACY, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL, CITIES, CITIZEN, CITIZENS, COMMUNITY LEADERS, CONSTITUTION, CORRUPTION, DECENTRALIZATION, DEVOLUTION, DISTRICTS, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, HEALTH SPENDING, INFORMAL SECTOR, INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT, INSTITUTIONAL REFORM, LAWS, LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY, LOCAL AUTONOMY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, LOCAL LEVELS, MACROECONOMICS, MIGRATION, MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS, MUNICIPALITIES, NATIONAL ELECTIONS, POLICY IMPLICATIONS, POLITICAL AUTHORITY, PRESIDENCY, PUBLIC GOODS, PUBLIC HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH CARE, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE, PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY, PUBLIC SERVICES, RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS, ROADS, SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, TAX, TAX REVENUE, TRANSPARENCY, VOTING, WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT, GOVERNANCE, ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY, INFORMATION GAPS,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/2011701/decentralization-governance-decentralization-improve-public-service-delivery
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-okr-1098611382
record_format koha
spelling dig-okr-10986113822024-08-08T17:51:54Z Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery? Descentralizacion y gestion de gobierno: Contribuye la descentralizacion a mejorar la prestacion de servicios publicos? Kahkonen, Satu Lanyi, Anthony ACCOUNTABILITY AUDITS AUTHORITY BUREAUCRACY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL CITIES CITIZEN CITIZENS COMMUNITY LEADERS CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION DECENTRALIZATION DEVOLUTION DISTRICTS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT HEALTH SPENDING INFORMAL SECTOR INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTIONAL REFORM LAWS LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY LOCAL AUTONOMY LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVELS MACROECONOMICS MIGRATION MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS MUNICIPALITIES NATIONAL ELECTIONS POLICY IMPLICATIONS POLITICAL AUTHORITY PRESIDENCY PUBLIC GOODS PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY PUBLIC SERVICES RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS ROADS SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS TAX TAX REVENUE TRANSPARENCY VOTING WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT GOVERNANCE PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY BUREAUCRACY CORRUPTION INFORMATION GAPS Decentralization holds a lot of promise, but whether it improves public service delivery depends on the institutional arrangements governing its implementation. Several conditions must be met before the full benefits of decentralization can be reaped. First, for decentralization to increase allocative and productive efficiency, local governments need to have the authority to respond to local demand as well as adequate mechanisms for accountability. Because granting authority without accountability can lead to corruption and lower productive efficiency, decentralization needs to be accompanied by reforms that increase the transparency and accountability of local government. Second, functions need to be devolved to a low enough level of government for allocative efficiency to increase as a result of decentralization. Low-level governments are likely to be aware of local preferences and, if able to do so, are likely to adjust service delivery accordingly. Third, citizens should have channels to communicate their preferences and get their voices heard in local governments. But the existence of such channels is not enough. To effectively influence public policies and oversee local governments, citizens need to have information about government policies and activities. The media play a crucial role in this area. 2012-08-13T14:54:57Z 2012-08-13T14:54:57Z 2001-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/2011701/decentralization-governance-decentralization-improve-public-service-delivery https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11382 English PREM Notes; No. 55 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank application/pdf text/plain World Bank, Washington, DC
institution Banco Mundial
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-okr
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca del Banco Mundial
language English
topic ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUREAUCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
CITIES
CITIZEN
CITIZENS
COMMUNITY LEADERS
CONSTITUTION
CORRUPTION
DECENTRALIZATION
DEVOLUTION
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
INFORMAL SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LAWS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL LEVELS
MACROECONOMICS
MIGRATION
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS
MUNICIPALITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
PRESIDENCY
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ROADS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX
TAX REVENUE
TRANSPARENCY
VOTING
WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
BUREAUCRACY
CORRUPTION
INFORMATION GAPS
ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUREAUCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
CITIES
CITIZEN
CITIZENS
COMMUNITY LEADERS
CONSTITUTION
CORRUPTION
DECENTRALIZATION
DEVOLUTION
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
INFORMAL SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LAWS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL LEVELS
MACROECONOMICS
MIGRATION
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS
MUNICIPALITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
PRESIDENCY
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ROADS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX
TAX REVENUE
TRANSPARENCY
VOTING
WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
BUREAUCRACY
CORRUPTION
INFORMATION GAPS
spellingShingle ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUREAUCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
CITIES
CITIZEN
CITIZENS
COMMUNITY LEADERS
CONSTITUTION
CORRUPTION
DECENTRALIZATION
DEVOLUTION
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
INFORMAL SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LAWS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL LEVELS
MACROECONOMICS
MIGRATION
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS
MUNICIPALITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
PRESIDENCY
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ROADS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX
TAX REVENUE
TRANSPARENCY
VOTING
WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
BUREAUCRACY
CORRUPTION
INFORMATION GAPS
ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUREAUCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
CITIES
CITIZEN
CITIZENS
COMMUNITY LEADERS
CONSTITUTION
CORRUPTION
DECENTRALIZATION
DEVOLUTION
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
INFORMAL SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LAWS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL LEVELS
MACROECONOMICS
MIGRATION
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS
MUNICIPALITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
PRESIDENCY
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ROADS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX
TAX REVENUE
TRANSPARENCY
VOTING
WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
BUREAUCRACY
CORRUPTION
INFORMATION GAPS
Kahkonen, Satu
Lanyi, Anthony
Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
description Decentralization holds a lot of promise, but whether it improves public service delivery depends on the institutional arrangements governing its implementation. Several conditions must be met before the full benefits of decentralization can be reaped. First, for decentralization to increase allocative and productive efficiency, local governments need to have the authority to respond to local demand as well as adequate mechanisms for accountability. Because granting authority without accountability can lead to corruption and lower productive efficiency, decentralization needs to be accompanied by reforms that increase the transparency and accountability of local government. Second, functions need to be devolved to a low enough level of government for allocative efficiency to increase as a result of decentralization. Low-level governments are likely to be aware of local preferences and, if able to do so, are likely to adjust service delivery accordingly. Third, citizens should have channels to communicate their preferences and get their voices heard in local governments. But the existence of such channels is not enough. To effectively influence public policies and oversee local governments, citizens need to have information about government policies and activities. The media play a crucial role in this area.
topic_facet ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITS
AUTHORITY
BUREAUCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL
CITIES
CITIZEN
CITIZENS
COMMUNITY LEADERS
CONSTITUTION
CORRUPTION
DECENTRALIZATION
DEVOLUTION
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
HEALTH SPENDING
INFORMAL SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
LAWS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTONOMY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL LEVELS
MACROECONOMICS
MIGRATION
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS
MUNICIPALITIES
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
PRESIDENCY
PUBLIC GOODS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
ROADS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX
TAX REVENUE
TRANSPARENCY
VOTING
WATER SUPPLY DECENTRALIZATION IN GOVERNMENT
GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
BUREAUCRACY
CORRUPTION
INFORMATION GAPS
author Kahkonen, Satu
Lanyi, Anthony
author_facet Kahkonen, Satu
Lanyi, Anthony
author_sort Kahkonen, Satu
title Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
title_short Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
title_full Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
title_fullStr Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
title_full_unstemmed Decentralization and Governance : Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?
title_sort decentralization and governance : does decentralization improve public service delivery?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2001-06
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/2011701/decentralization-governance-decentralization-improve-public-service-delivery
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11382
work_keys_str_mv AT kahkonensatu decentralizationandgovernancedoesdecentralizationimprovepublicservicedelivery
AT lanyianthony decentralizationandgovernancedoesdecentralizationimprovepublicservicedelivery
AT kahkonensatu descentralizacionygestiondegobiernocontribuyeladescentralizacionamejorarlaprestaciondeserviciospublicos
AT lanyianthony descentralizacionygestiondegobiernocontribuyeladescentralizacionamejorarlaprestaciondeserviciospublicos
_version_ 1807154648876843008