Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | artículo biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academic Press
2002
|
Subjects: | Canary Islands, Falco, Gallotia, Germination, Lanius, Lycium, viability, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-ipna-es-10261-22399 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-ipna-es-10261-223992019-11-18T11:16:48Z Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? Nogales, Manuel Quilis, Vicente Medina, Félix M. Mora, Juan L. Trigo, Laura S. Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time. We thank A. Valido for supplying data on fruit traits and who read an earlier version of the manuscript. F. Valdés gave technical assistance on performing seed viability tests and P. Jordano, D. Wenny, P. Moore, A. Traveset, J. Alonso and C. Nieves provided all kinds of advice. We specially thank the Armadas Española (Zona Marítima de Canarias) for transporting the researchers and the equipment to Alegranza. Peer reviewed 2010-03-15T14:00:06Z 2010-03-15T14:00:06Z 2002 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: pp. 345-352 (2002) 0024-4066 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399 1095-8312 en open 115237 bytes application/pdf Academic Press |
institution |
IPNA ES |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-ipna-es |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del IPNA España |
language |
English |
topic |
Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability |
spellingShingle |
Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability Nogales, Manuel Quilis, Vicente Medina, Félix M. Mora, Juan L. Trigo, Laura S. Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
description |
We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time. |
format |
artículo |
topic_facet |
Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability |
author |
Nogales, Manuel Quilis, Vicente Medina, Félix M. Mora, Juan L. Trigo, Laura S. |
author_facet |
Nogales, Manuel Quilis, Vicente Medina, Félix M. Mora, Juan L. Trigo, Laura S. |
author_sort |
Nogales, Manuel |
title |
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
title_short |
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
title_full |
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
title_fullStr |
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
title_sort |
are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? |
publisher |
Academic Press |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nogalesmanuel arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers AT quilisvicente arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers AT medinafelixm arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers AT morajuanl arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers AT trigolauras arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers |
_version_ |
1777669699592519680 |