Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?

We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nogales, Manuel, Quilis, Vicente, Medina, Félix M., Mora, Juan L., Trigo, Laura S.
Format: artículo biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Academic Press 2002
Subjects:Canary Islands, Falco, Gallotia, Germination, Lanius, Lycium, viability,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-ipna-es-10261-22399
record_format koha
spelling dig-ipna-es-10261-223992019-11-18T11:16:48Z Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers? Nogales, Manuel Quilis, Vicente Medina, Félix M. Mora, Juan L. Trigo, Laura S. Canary Islands Falco Gallotia Germination Lanius Lycium viability We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time. We thank A. Valido for supplying data on fruit traits and who read an earlier version of the manuscript. F. Valdés gave technical assistance on performing seed viability tests and P. Jordano, D. Wenny, P. Moore, A. Traveset, J. Alonso and C. Nieves provided all kinds of advice. We specially thank the Armadas Española (Zona Marítima de Canarias) for transporting the researchers and the equipment to Alegranza. Peer reviewed 2010-03-15T14:00:06Z 2010-03-15T14:00:06Z 2002 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: pp. 345-352 (2002) 0024-4066 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399 1095-8312 en open 115237 bytes application/pdf Academic Press
institution IPNA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ipna-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IPNA España
language English
topic Canary Islands
Falco
Gallotia
Germination
Lanius
Lycium
viability
Canary Islands
Falco
Gallotia
Germination
Lanius
Lycium
viability
spellingShingle Canary Islands
Falco
Gallotia
Germination
Lanius
Lycium
viability
Canary Islands
Falco
Gallotia
Germination
Lanius
Lycium
viability
Nogales, Manuel
Quilis, Vicente
Medina, Félix M.
Mora, Juan L.
Trigo, Laura S.
Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
description We have studied the unusual phenomenon of secondary seed dispersal of Lycium intricatum seeds on a small oceanic Atlantic island (Alegranza, Canarian Archipelago)in which a small frugivorous lizard (Gallotia atlantica) and two different predatory birds participate, a shrike (Lanius excubitor) and a kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Endemic lizards that are common prey of both bird species consume Lycium fruits. Lizard remains were significantly matched with the presence of Lycium fruits in the regurgitation pellets of thye two predatory birds. Seeds were found in 7.3% of the lizard droppings, 31.0% of kestrel pellets and 55.7% of shrike regurgitations. The mean number of seeds per dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds dropping or pellet was 4.8 + 4 in lñizard, 20.2 + 34.5 in shrike and 6.7 + 8.1 in kestrel. The percentage of viable seeds shoved significant differences among all four treatments, decreasing in the following direction: seeds collected directly from plants (98.0%), shrikes (88.0%), lizards (72.3>%), and kestrels (311.7%). Seeds from Lycium fresh fruits and shrike pellets showed significantly higher germination rates than those from lizard droppings and kestrelpellets. While lizards and shrikes are effective deed dispersers, kestrel gut treatment decreases seed viability. Seed viability is alwais higher than seed germination in each of the four treatments. In this island environment, Lycium seeds are under an important random influence during the seed dispersal process. Secondary seed dispersal seems to acquire a relevant dimension in small and re,ote insular environments or isolated continental systems where interactions among the diferent elements involved are intense, all of them are abundant native residents, and they have been coexisting for a long time.
format artículo
topic_facet Canary Islands
Falco
Gallotia
Germination
Lanius
Lycium
viability
author Nogales, Manuel
Quilis, Vicente
Medina, Félix M.
Mora, Juan L.
Trigo, Laura S.
author_facet Nogales, Manuel
Quilis, Vicente
Medina, Félix M.
Mora, Juan L.
Trigo, Laura S.
author_sort Nogales, Manuel
title Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
title_short Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
title_full Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
title_fullStr Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
title_full_unstemmed Are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
title_sort are predatory birds effective secondary seed dispersers?
publisher Academic Press
publishDate 2002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/22399
work_keys_str_mv AT nogalesmanuel arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers
AT quilisvicente arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers
AT medinafelixm arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers
AT morajuanl arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers
AT trigolauras arepredatorybirdseffectivesecondaryseeddispersers
_version_ 1777669699592519680