Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | journal article biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2010
|
Subjects: | Bioeconomic model, Weed control, Sterile oat, Triticum aestivum, Environment, Herbicide rate, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-inia-es-10261-293690 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-inia-es-10261-2936902023-02-20T10:31:01Z Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Bastida, F. Calvo, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, L. Izquierdo, J. Lezaun, J. A. Perea, F. Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. Urbano, J. M. Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society. 2023-02-20T10:31:01Z 2023-02-20T10:31:01Z 2010 journal article Weed Research 50(1): 83-88 (2010) 0043-1737 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00744.x 1365-3180 en none Wiley |
institution |
INIA ES |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-inia-es |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del INIA España |
language |
English |
topic |
Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate |
spellingShingle |
Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Bastida, F. Calvo, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, L. Izquierdo, J. Lezaun, J. A. Perea, F. Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. Urbano, J. M. Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
description |
Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society. |
format |
journal article |
topic_facet |
Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate |
author |
Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Bastida, F. Calvo, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, L. Izquierdo, J. Lezaun, J. A. Perea, F. Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. Urbano, J. M. |
author_facet |
Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Bastida, F. Calvo, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, L. Izquierdo, J. Lezaun, J. A. Perea, F. Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. Urbano, J. M. |
author_sort |
Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. |
title |
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
title_short |
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
title_full |
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
title_fullStr |
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
title_sort |
field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gonzalezandujarjl fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT fernandezquintanillac fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT bastidaf fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT calvor fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT gonzalezdiazl fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT izquierdoj fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT lezaunja fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT pereaf fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT sanchezdelarcomj fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat AT urbanojm fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat |
_version_ |
1767603510532112384 |