Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat

Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L., Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., Bastida, F., Calvo, R., Gonzalez-Diaz, L., Izquierdo, J., Lezaun, J. A., Perea, F., Sanchez Del Arco, M. J., Urbano, J. M.
Format: journal article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010
Subjects:Bioeconomic model, Weed control, Sterile oat, Triticum aestivum, Environment, Herbicide rate,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-inia-es-10261-293690
record_format koha
spelling dig-inia-es-10261-2936902023-02-20T10:31:01Z Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. Bastida, F. Calvo, R. Gonzalez-Diaz, L. Izquierdo, J. Lezaun, J. A. Perea, F. Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. Urbano, J. M. Bioeconomic model Weed control Sterile oat Triticum aestivum Environment Herbicide rate Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society. 2023-02-20T10:31:01Z 2023-02-20T10:31:01Z 2010 journal article Weed Research 50(1): 83-88 (2010) 0043-1737 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00744.x 1365-3180 en none Wiley
institution INIA ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inia-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INIA España
language English
topic Bioeconomic model
Weed control
Sterile oat
Triticum aestivum
Environment
Herbicide rate
Bioeconomic model
Weed control
Sterile oat
Triticum aestivum
Environment
Herbicide rate
spellingShingle Bioeconomic model
Weed control
Sterile oat
Triticum aestivum
Environment
Herbicide rate
Bioeconomic model
Weed control
Sterile oat
Triticum aestivum
Environment
Herbicide rate
Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C.
Bastida, F.
Calvo, R.
Gonzalez-Diaz, L.
Izquierdo, J.
Lezaun, J. A.
Perea, F.
Sanchez Del Arco, M. J.
Urbano, J. M.
Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
description Two field studies were conducted in Central and Northern Spain over a total of five seasons to assess the usefulness of a decision support system (AVENA-PC) from agronomic, economic and environmental points of view on herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat. The control treatments evaluated were (i) AVENA-PC-based recommendations, (ii) full herbicide dose (standard farmer practice), (iii) half herbicide dose and (iv) no herbicide. The herbicide rates used in the AVENA-PC treatment averaged 65% and 30% lower than the full and half dose treatments respectively. AVENA-PC implementation controlled A. ludoviciana with similar efficacy as standard herbicide treatments. Nevertheless, it did support a reduction in relation to the non-herbicide treatment. Yields obtained with AVENA-PC were, in general, not statistically different to those obtained with herbicide treatments and were on average 69% higher than those in the no herbicide application strategy. Comparing AVENA-PC economic performance with the other treatments there were, in general, no significant statistical differences in Central Spain. In Northern Spain, all herbicide treatments had similar net returns, with there being no statistical differences between AVENA-PC and the herbicide treatments. However, there were differences recorded with the non-herbicide treatment. The results of this research indicate that AVENA-PC, due to its flexibility, may recommend less herbicide than the standard farmer practice, providing clear environmental benefits and adequate weed control with maintained crop yield and net returns similar to standard farmer practice. © 2010 European Weed Research Society.
format journal article
topic_facet Bioeconomic model
Weed control
Sterile oat
Triticum aestivum
Environment
Herbicide rate
author Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C.
Bastida, F.
Calvo, R.
Gonzalez-Diaz, L.
Izquierdo, J.
Lezaun, J. A.
Perea, F.
Sanchez Del Arco, M. J.
Urbano, J. M.
author_facet Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L.
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C.
Bastida, F.
Calvo, R.
Gonzalez-Diaz, L.
Izquierdo, J.
Lezaun, J. A.
Perea, F.
Sanchez Del Arco, M. J.
Urbano, J. M.
author_sort Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L.
title Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
title_short Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
title_full Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
title_fullStr Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
title_sort field evaluation of a decision support system for herbicidal control of avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana in winter wheat
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12792/1868
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/293690
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezandujarjl fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT fernandezquintanillac fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT bastidaf fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT calvor fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT gonzalezdiazl fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT izquierdoj fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT lezaunja fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT pereaf fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT sanchezdelarcomj fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
AT urbanojm fieldevaluationofadecisionsupportsystemforherbicidalcontrolofavenasterilissspludovicianainwinterwheat
_version_ 1767603510532112384