Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents

Several concepts to capture CO2 are under developing using CaO as regenerable sorbent. The drastic decay in sorbent capture capacity of CaO obtained from natural sources of CaCO3 is leading to an increasing number of authors proposing synthetic sorbents to overcome this decay. Some recent developments have been reviewed and tested under comparable conditions. Results confirm the good performance of some of these synthetic sorbents under mild conditions. However, they deactivate also very quickly when realistic regeneration conditions (high calcination temperatures and high concentration of CO2) are used in the laboratory test. It is concluded than none of the reviewed synthetic sorbents have a chance to compete with the "modest" performance of natural limestones that show two competitive advantages: The maintenance of a suitable CO2 capture capacity under demanding process conditions; and their intrinsic low cost.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grasa Adiego, Gemma, González García, Belén, Alonso Carreño, Mónica, Abanades García, Juan Carlos
Format: comunicación de congreso biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:CO2 capture, Absorption, Carbonation/calcination cycles,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5119
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-incar-es-10261-5119
record_format koha
spelling dig-incar-es-10261-51192018-10-10T09:40:57Z Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents Grasa Adiego, Gemma González García, Belén Alonso Carreño, Mónica Abanades García, Juan Carlos CO2 capture Absorption Carbonation/calcination cycles Several concepts to capture CO2 are under developing using CaO as regenerable sorbent. The drastic decay in sorbent capture capacity of CaO obtained from natural sources of CaCO3 is leading to an increasing number of authors proposing synthetic sorbents to overcome this decay. Some recent developments have been reviewed and tested under comparable conditions. Results confirm the good performance of some of these synthetic sorbents under mild conditions. However, they deactivate also very quickly when realistic regeneration conditions (high calcination temperatures and high concentration of CO2) are used in the laboratory test. It is concluded than none of the reviewed synthetic sorbents have a chance to compete with the "modest" performance of natural limestones that show two competitive advantages: The maintenance of a suitable CO2 capture capacity under demanding process conditions; and their intrinsic low cost. European Commission (Comisión Europea), C3-Capture and the Spanish Ministry of Education (Ministerio de Educación) "Juan de la Cierva" Program Peer reviewed 2008-06-16T12:27:14Z 2008-06-16T12:27:14Z 2007 comunicación de congreso http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 International Conference on Coal Science and Technology. Nottingham (Reino Unido), 28-31 agosto de 2007 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5119 en open 94899 bytes application/pdf
institution INCAR ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-incar-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del INCAR España
language English
topic CO2 capture
Absorption
Carbonation/calcination cycles
CO2 capture
Absorption
Carbonation/calcination cycles
spellingShingle CO2 capture
Absorption
Carbonation/calcination cycles
CO2 capture
Absorption
Carbonation/calcination cycles
Grasa Adiego, Gemma
González García, Belén
Alonso Carreño, Mónica
Abanades García, Juan Carlos
Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
description Several concepts to capture CO2 are under developing using CaO as regenerable sorbent. The drastic decay in sorbent capture capacity of CaO obtained from natural sources of CaCO3 is leading to an increasing number of authors proposing synthetic sorbents to overcome this decay. Some recent developments have been reviewed and tested under comparable conditions. Results confirm the good performance of some of these synthetic sorbents under mild conditions. However, they deactivate also very quickly when realistic regeneration conditions (high calcination temperatures and high concentration of CO2) are used in the laboratory test. It is concluded than none of the reviewed synthetic sorbents have a chance to compete with the "modest" performance of natural limestones that show two competitive advantages: The maintenance of a suitable CO2 capture capacity under demanding process conditions; and their intrinsic low cost.
format comunicación de congreso
topic_facet CO2 capture
Absorption
Carbonation/calcination cycles
author Grasa Adiego, Gemma
González García, Belén
Alonso Carreño, Mónica
Abanades García, Juan Carlos
author_facet Grasa Adiego, Gemma
González García, Belén
Alonso Carreño, Mónica
Abanades García, Juan Carlos
author_sort Grasa Adiego, Gemma
title Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
title_short Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
title_full Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
title_fullStr Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Natural and Synthetic Precursors of CaO as CO2 sorbents
title_sort comparison of natural and synthetic precursors of cao as co2 sorbents
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5119
work_keys_str_mv AT grasaadiegogemma comparisonofnaturalandsyntheticprecursorsofcaoasco2sorbents
AT gonzalezgarciabelen comparisonofnaturalandsyntheticprecursorsofcaoasco2sorbents
AT alonsocarrenomonica comparisonofnaturalandsyntheticprecursorsofcaoasco2sorbents
AT abanadesgarciajuancarlos comparisonofnaturalandsyntheticprecursorsofcaoasco2sorbents
_version_ 1777668859760738304