Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology
The emergence of paleogenomics (the study and analysis of ancient genomes) has provided a new, powerful source of information that can be used to test previous hypotheses regarding human evolution. However, various misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of genetic data in an archaeological and paleontological context and the existence of different scientific goals tend to hinder the fluent and fruitful collaboration between these fields. Here we explore some of the subjects creating confusion, such as the problems associated with molecular clocks, the difference between sequence divergence and species divergence, and the limitations of the uniparental markers. Limited understanding of how the expression of a genome shapes the phenotype (including morphology and cognition) is the main obstacle to linking the genetic and the morphological evidence available. In the case of Neanderthals (and probably Denisovans, too), it is obvious that the conspicuous morphological differences cannot be explained by differences in a list of about 100 genes alone, thus suggesting that regulatory genomic elements must have been involved. A functional analysis of the genes involved as well as a study of the genomic architecture- a complexity level above the simple DNA message-could help us fill this gap. It is hoped that this future work will lead to the emergence of an interrelated and multidisciplinary view of the study of the past based on real collaborative efforts among disciplines. © 2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | artículo biblioteca |
Published: |
University of Chicago Press
2013-12
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/111400 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-ibe-es-10261-111400 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-ibe-es-10261-1114002018-09-17T11:28:31Z Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology Lalueza-Fox, Carles Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) The emergence of paleogenomics (the study and analysis of ancient genomes) has provided a new, powerful source of information that can be used to test previous hypotheses regarding human evolution. However, various misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of genetic data in an archaeological and paleontological context and the existence of different scientific goals tend to hinder the fluent and fruitful collaboration between these fields. Here we explore some of the subjects creating confusion, such as the problems associated with molecular clocks, the difference between sequence divergence and species divergence, and the limitations of the uniparental markers. Limited understanding of how the expression of a genome shapes the phenotype (including morphology and cognition) is the main obstacle to linking the genetic and the morphological evidence available. In the case of Neanderthals (and probably Denisovans, too), it is obvious that the conspicuous morphological differences cannot be explained by differences in a list of about 100 genes alone, thus suggesting that regulatory genomic elements must have been involved. A functional analysis of the genes involved as well as a study of the genomic architecture- a complexity level above the simple DNA message-could help us fill this gap. It is hoped that this future work will lead to the emergence of an interrelated and multidisciplinary view of the study of the past based on real collaborative efforts among disciplines. © 2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved. My research is supported by a grant (BFU2012-34157) from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain. Peer Reviewed 2015-02-26T12:39:19Z 2015-02-26T12:39:19Z 2013-12 2015-02-26T12:39:20Z artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 doi: 10.1086/673387 issn: 0011-3204 e-issn: 1537-5382 Current Anthropology 54(8): S214-S220 (2013) http://hdl.handle.net/10261/111400 10.1086/673387 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 Publisher's version http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673387 Sí open University of Chicago Press |
institution |
IBE ES |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
España |
countrycode |
ES |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-ibe-es |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del IBE España |
description |
The emergence of paleogenomics (the study and analysis of ancient genomes) has provided a new, powerful source of information that can be used to test previous hypotheses regarding human evolution. However, various misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of genetic data in an archaeological and paleontological context and the existence of different scientific goals tend to hinder the fluent and fruitful collaboration between these fields. Here we explore some of the subjects creating confusion, such as the problems associated with molecular clocks, the difference between sequence divergence and species divergence, and the limitations of the uniparental markers. Limited understanding of how the expression of a genome shapes the phenotype (including morphology and cognition) is the main obstacle to linking the genetic and the morphological evidence available. In the case of Neanderthals (and probably Denisovans, too), it is obvious that the conspicuous morphological differences cannot be explained by differences in a list of about 100 genes alone, thus suggesting that regulatory genomic elements must have been involved. A functional analysis of the genes involved as well as a study of the genomic architecture- a complexity level above the simple DNA message-could help us fill this gap. It is hoped that this future work will lead to the emergence of an interrelated and multidisciplinary view of the study of the past based on real collaborative efforts among disciplines. © 2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved. |
author2 |
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) |
author_facet |
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Lalueza-Fox, Carles |
format |
artículo |
author |
Lalueza-Fox, Carles |
spellingShingle |
Lalueza-Fox, Carles Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
author_sort |
Lalueza-Fox, Carles |
title |
Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
title_short |
Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
title_full |
Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
title_fullStr |
Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
title_sort |
agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
publisher |
University of Chicago Press |
publishDate |
2013-12 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/111400 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laluezafoxcarles agreementsandmisunderstandingsamongthreescientificfieldspaleogenomicsarchaeologyandhumanpaleontology |
_version_ |
1777668576672481280 |