Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity

Public interest in biodiversity has never been so high, but the necessary inventory of existing species is hindered by the scarcity of taxonomists able to characterise and describe new species (α-taxonomy). This situation is particularly worrisome in nematology where only a small fraction of the estimated 105 to 108 existing species has been described and where experienced taxonomists are fast disappearing while the few that are still active find it increasingly difficult to publish morphological descriptions and to get financial support for biodiversity studies. The present disregard for α-taxonomy is said to originate from the excessive reliance by funding agencies and academic authorities on the Impact Factors attributed to scientific journals by ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). Molecular studies gave back some support and prestige to taxonomy, but that approach suffers from some limitations and it cannot be used alone for reaching taxonomic conclusions. In addition, any described DNA sequence should always be linked to a named species whose morphology has been correctly described by a trained taxonomist. The authors call for a renewed interest in α-taxonomy. Electronic publication according to the Code of Zoological Nomenclature would be one solution, but journals and authors seem reluctant to accept it. A variant would be to publish on paper only the diagnosis of the new species. The complete descriptions could be deposited in an Internet database but the setting-up of such a database would be a costly enterprise that would require several years of work by a team composed of morphological and molecular taxonomists and computer scientists. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luc, Michel, Doucet, Marcelo E., Fortuner, Renaud, Castillo, Pablo, Decraemer, W. A., Lax, Paola
Format: artículo biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Brill Academic Publishers 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/27081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-ias-es-10261-27081
record_format koha
spelling dig-ias-es-10261-270812018-08-01T10:05:01Z Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity Luc, Michel Doucet, Marcelo E. Fortuner, Renaud Castillo, Pablo Decraemer, W. A. Lax, Paola Public interest in biodiversity has never been so high, but the necessary inventory of existing species is hindered by the scarcity of taxonomists able to characterise and describe new species (α-taxonomy). This situation is particularly worrisome in nematology where only a small fraction of the estimated 105 to 108 existing species has been described and where experienced taxonomists are fast disappearing while the few that are still active find it increasingly difficult to publish morphological descriptions and to get financial support for biodiversity studies. The present disregard for α-taxonomy is said to originate from the excessive reliance by funding agencies and academic authorities on the Impact Factors attributed to scientific journals by ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). Molecular studies gave back some support and prestige to taxonomy, but that approach suffers from some limitations and it cannot be used alone for reaching taxonomic conclusions. In addition, any described DNA sequence should always be linked to a named species whose morphology has been correctly described by a trained taxonomist. The authors call for a renewed interest in α-taxonomy. Electronic publication according to the Code of Zoological Nomenclature would be one solution, but journals and authors seem reluctant to accept it. A variant would be to publish on paper only the diagnosis of the new species. The complete descriptions could be deposited in an Internet database but the setting-up of such a database would be a costly enterprise that would require several years of work by a team composed of morphological and molecular taxonomists and computer scientists. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010. Peer reviewed 2010-08-15T19:07:32Z 2010-08-15T19:07:32Z 2010 artículo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Nematology 12(4):495-504 (2010) 1568-5411 http://hdl.handle.net/10261/27081 10.1163/138855410X508697 1568-5411 en open 56127 bytes application/pdf Brill Academic Publishers
institution IAS ES
collection DSpace
country España
countrycode ES
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ias-es
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca del IAS España
language English
description Public interest in biodiversity has never been so high, but the necessary inventory of existing species is hindered by the scarcity of taxonomists able to characterise and describe new species (α-taxonomy). This situation is particularly worrisome in nematology where only a small fraction of the estimated 105 to 108 existing species has been described and where experienced taxonomists are fast disappearing while the few that are still active find it increasingly difficult to publish morphological descriptions and to get financial support for biodiversity studies. The present disregard for α-taxonomy is said to originate from the excessive reliance by funding agencies and academic authorities on the Impact Factors attributed to scientific journals by ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). Molecular studies gave back some support and prestige to taxonomy, but that approach suffers from some limitations and it cannot be used alone for reaching taxonomic conclusions. In addition, any described DNA sequence should always be linked to a named species whose morphology has been correctly described by a trained taxonomist. The authors call for a renewed interest in α-taxonomy. Electronic publication according to the Code of Zoological Nomenclature would be one solution, but journals and authors seem reluctant to accept it. A variant would be to publish on paper only the diagnosis of the new species. The complete descriptions could be deposited in an Internet database but the setting-up of such a database would be a costly enterprise that would require several years of work by a team composed of morphological and molecular taxonomists and computer scientists. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010.
format artículo
author Luc, Michel
Doucet, Marcelo E.
Fortuner, Renaud
Castillo, Pablo
Decraemer, W. A.
Lax, Paola
spellingShingle Luc, Michel
Doucet, Marcelo E.
Fortuner, Renaud
Castillo, Pablo
Decraemer, W. A.
Lax, Paola
Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
author_facet Luc, Michel
Doucet, Marcelo E.
Fortuner, Renaud
Castillo, Pablo
Decraemer, W. A.
Lax, Paola
author_sort Luc, Michel
title Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
title_short Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
title_full Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
title_fullStr Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
title_sort usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity
publisher Brill Academic Publishers
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/27081
work_keys_str_mv AT lucmichel usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
AT doucetmarceloe usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
AT fortunerrenaud usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
AT castillopablo usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
AT decraemerwa usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
AT laxpaola usefulnessofmorphologicaldataforthestudyofnematodebiodiversity
_version_ 1777662939066531840