Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa
Effective planning of a large-scale restoration project is challenging, because of the range of factors that need to be considered (e.g. restoration of multiple habitats with varying degradation levels, multiple restoration goals and limited conservation resources). Ecological restoration planning studies typically focus on biodiversity and ecosystem services, rather than employment and other co-benefits. Robust Offsetting (RobOff), a restoration planning tool, was used in a forest restoration project in Durban, South Africa, to plan forest restoration considering a mosaic of habitats with varying levels of degradation, diverse restoration actions, a limited budget and multiple (biodiversity, carbon stock and employment) goals. To achieve this, the restoration action currently being implemented (= current action) was compared to three restoration alternatives. The three restoration alternatives included (1) natural regeneration action; (2) carbon action; and (3) biodiversity action. The results supported biodiversity action as most beneficial in terms of maximizing biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. Results showed that investing in biodiversity action is preferable to the status quo. RobOff ensured optimal allocation of limited resources to actions and habitats that have a potential to achieve higher biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation.
id |
dig-cirad-fr-607970 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
CIRAD FR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cirad-fr |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia |
language |
eng |
topic |
biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 |
spellingShingle |
biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 Mugwedi, Lutendo F. Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti Roy, Kathryn E. Egoh, Benis Pouzols, Federico M. Douwes, Errol Boon, Richard O'Donoghue, Sean Slotow, Rob Di Minin, Enrico Moilanen, Atte Rouget, Mathieu Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
description |
Effective planning of a large-scale restoration project is challenging, because of the range of factors that need to be considered (e.g. restoration of multiple habitats with varying degradation levels, multiple restoration goals and limited conservation resources). Ecological restoration planning studies typically focus on biodiversity and ecosystem services, rather than employment and other co-benefits. Robust Offsetting (RobOff), a restoration planning tool, was used in a forest restoration project in Durban, South Africa, to plan forest restoration considering a mosaic of habitats with varying levels of degradation, diverse restoration actions, a limited budget and multiple (biodiversity, carbon stock and employment) goals. To achieve this, the restoration action currently being implemented (= current action) was compared to three restoration alternatives. The three restoration alternatives included (1) natural regeneration action; (2) carbon action; and (3) biodiversity action. The results supported biodiversity action as most beneficial in terms of maximizing biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. Results showed that investing in biodiversity action is preferable to the status quo. RobOff ensured optimal allocation of limited resources to actions and habitats that have a potential to achieve higher biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. |
format |
article |
topic_facet |
biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 |
author |
Mugwedi, Lutendo F. Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti Roy, Kathryn E. Egoh, Benis Pouzols, Federico M. Douwes, Errol Boon, Richard O'Donoghue, Sean Slotow, Rob Di Minin, Enrico Moilanen, Atte Rouget, Mathieu |
author_facet |
Mugwedi, Lutendo F. Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti Roy, Kathryn E. Egoh, Benis Pouzols, Federico M. Douwes, Errol Boon, Richard O'Donoghue, Sean Slotow, Rob Di Minin, Enrico Moilanen, Atte Rouget, Mathieu |
author_sort |
Mugwedi, Lutendo F. |
title |
Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
title_short |
Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
title_full |
Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa |
title_sort |
restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of durban, south africa |
url |
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607970/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607970/1/Restoration%20planning%20for%20climate%20change%20mitigation%20and%20adaptation%20in%20the%20city%20of%20Durban%20South%20Africa.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mugwedilutendof restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT raymukherjeejayanti restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT roykathryne restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT egohbenis restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT pouzolsfedericom restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT douweserrol restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT boonrichard restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT odonoghuesean restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT slotowrob restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT dimininenrico restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT moilanenatte restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica AT rougetmathieu restorationplanningforclimatechangemitigationandadaptationinthecityofdurbansouthafrica |
_version_ |
1802821410558574592 |
spelling |
dig-cirad-fr-6079702024-05-30T16:02:35Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607970/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607970/ Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa. Mugwedi Lutendo F., Ray-Mukherjee Jayanti, Roy Kathryn E., Egoh Benis, Pouzols Federico M., Douwes Errol, Boon Richard, O'Donoghue Sean, Slotow Rob, Di Minin Enrico, Moilanen Atte, Rouget Mathieu. 2018. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 14 (1) : 132-144.https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967 <https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967> Restoration planning for climate change mitigation and adaptation in the city of Durban, South Africa Mugwedi, Lutendo F. Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti Roy, Kathryn E. Egoh, Benis Pouzols, Federico M. Douwes, Errol Boon, Richard O'Donoghue, Sean Slotow, Rob Di Minin, Enrico Moilanen, Atte Rouget, Mathieu eng 2018 International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management biodiversité adaptation aux changements climatiques reconstitution forestière séquestration du carbone changement climatique services écosystémiques politique de l'environnement régénération naturelle atténuation des effets du changement climatique restauration environnementale gestion des ressources naturelles biodiversité forestière approche participative protection de la forêt http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33949 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374567058134 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_13802 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5090 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374571087594 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1fd01672 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_0a269dfe http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 Afrique du Sud http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7252 Effective planning of a large-scale restoration project is challenging, because of the range of factors that need to be considered (e.g. restoration of multiple habitats with varying degradation levels, multiple restoration goals and limited conservation resources). Ecological restoration planning studies typically focus on biodiversity and ecosystem services, rather than employment and other co-benefits. Robust Offsetting (RobOff), a restoration planning tool, was used in a forest restoration project in Durban, South Africa, to plan forest restoration considering a mosaic of habitats with varying levels of degradation, diverse restoration actions, a limited budget and multiple (biodiversity, carbon stock and employment) goals. To achieve this, the restoration action currently being implemented (= current action) was compared to three restoration alternatives. The three restoration alternatives included (1) natural regeneration action; (2) carbon action; and (3) biodiversity action. The results supported biodiversity action as most beneficial in terms of maximizing biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. Results showed that investing in biodiversity action is preferable to the status quo. RobOff ensured optimal allocation of limited resources to actions and habitats that have a potential to achieve higher biodiversity, carbon storage and job creation. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/607970/1/Restoration%20planning%20for%20climate%20change%20mitigation%20and%20adaptation%20in%20the%20city%20of%20Durban%20South%20Africa.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967 10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1483967 info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/purl/https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Restoration_planning_for_climate_change_mitigation_and_adaptation_in_the_city_of_Durban_South_Africa/6669197 |