Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system

Bioenergy is projected to have a prominent, valuable, and maybe essential, role in climate management. However, there is significant variation in projected bioenergy deployment results, as well as concerns about the potential environmental and social implications of supplying biomass. Bioenergy deployment projections are market equilibrium solutions from integrated modeling, yet little is known about the underlying modeling of the supply of biomass as a feedstock for energy use in these modeling frameworks. We undertake a novel diagnostic analysis with ten global models to elucidate, compare, and assess how biomass is supplied within the models used to inform long-run climate management. With experiments that isolate and reveal biomass supply modeling behavior and characteristics (costs, emissions, land use, market effects), we learn about biomass supply tendencies and differences. The insights provide a new level of modeling transparency and understanding of estimated global biomass supplies that informs evaluation of the potential for bioenergy in managing the climate and interpretation of integrated modeling. For each model, we characterize the potential distributions of global biomass supply across regions and feedstock types for increasing levels of quantity supplied, as well as some of the potential societal externalities of supplying biomass. We also evaluate the biomass supply implications of managing these externalities. Finally, we interpret biomass market results from integrated modeling in terms of our new understanding of biomass supply. Overall, we find little consensus between models on where biomass could be cost-effectively produced and the implications. We also reveal model specific biomass supply narratives, with results providing new insights into integrated modeling bioenergy outcomes and differences. The analysis finds that many integrated models are considering and managing emissions and land use externalities of supplying biomass and estimating that environmental and societal trade-offs in the form of land emissions, land conversion, and higher agricultural prices are cost-effective, and to some degree a reality of using biomass, to address climate change.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rose, Steven K., Popp, Alexander, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Havlik, Petr, Weyant, John, Wise, Marshall, Van Vuuren, Detlef P., Brunelle, Thierry, Cui, Ryna Yiyun, Daioglou, Vassilis, Frank, Stefan, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Humpenöder, Florian, Kato, Etsushi, Sands, Ronald D., Sano, Fuminori, Tsutsui, Junichi, Doelman, Jonathan, Muratori, Matteo, Prudhomme, Rémi, Wada, Kenichi, Yamamoto, Hiromi
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Springer
Subjects:bioénergie, biomasse, utilisation des terres, réduction des émissions, changement climatique, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/1/Rose2022_Article_GlobalBiomassSupplyModelingFor.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-602142
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic bioénergie
biomasse
utilisation des terres
réduction des émissions
changement climatique
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666
bioénergie
biomasse
utilisation des terres
réduction des émissions
changement climatique
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666
spellingShingle bioénergie
biomasse
utilisation des terres
réduction des émissions
changement climatique
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666
bioénergie
biomasse
utilisation des terres
réduction des émissions
changement climatique
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666
Rose, Steven K.
Popp, Alexander
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Havlik, Petr
Weyant, John
Wise, Marshall
Van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Brunelle, Thierry
Cui, Ryna Yiyun
Daioglou, Vassilis
Frank, Stefan
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Humpenöder, Florian
Kato, Etsushi
Sands, Ronald D.
Sano, Fuminori
Tsutsui, Junichi
Doelman, Jonathan
Muratori, Matteo
Prudhomme, Rémi
Wada, Kenichi
Yamamoto, Hiromi
Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
description Bioenergy is projected to have a prominent, valuable, and maybe essential, role in climate management. However, there is significant variation in projected bioenergy deployment results, as well as concerns about the potential environmental and social implications of supplying biomass. Bioenergy deployment projections are market equilibrium solutions from integrated modeling, yet little is known about the underlying modeling of the supply of biomass as a feedstock for energy use in these modeling frameworks. We undertake a novel diagnostic analysis with ten global models to elucidate, compare, and assess how biomass is supplied within the models used to inform long-run climate management. With experiments that isolate and reveal biomass supply modeling behavior and characteristics (costs, emissions, land use, market effects), we learn about biomass supply tendencies and differences. The insights provide a new level of modeling transparency and understanding of estimated global biomass supplies that informs evaluation of the potential for bioenergy in managing the climate and interpretation of integrated modeling. For each model, we characterize the potential distributions of global biomass supply across regions and feedstock types for increasing levels of quantity supplied, as well as some of the potential societal externalities of supplying biomass. We also evaluate the biomass supply implications of managing these externalities. Finally, we interpret biomass market results from integrated modeling in terms of our new understanding of biomass supply. Overall, we find little consensus between models on where biomass could be cost-effectively produced and the implications. We also reveal model specific biomass supply narratives, with results providing new insights into integrated modeling bioenergy outcomes and differences. The analysis finds that many integrated models are considering and managing emissions and land use externalities of supplying biomass and estimating that environmental and societal trade-offs in the form of land emissions, land conversion, and higher agricultural prices are cost-effective, and to some degree a reality of using biomass, to address climate change.
format article
topic_facet bioénergie
biomasse
utilisation des terres
réduction des émissions
changement climatique
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666
author Rose, Steven K.
Popp, Alexander
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Havlik, Petr
Weyant, John
Wise, Marshall
Van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Brunelle, Thierry
Cui, Ryna Yiyun
Daioglou, Vassilis
Frank, Stefan
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Humpenöder, Florian
Kato, Etsushi
Sands, Ronald D.
Sano, Fuminori
Tsutsui, Junichi
Doelman, Jonathan
Muratori, Matteo
Prudhomme, Rémi
Wada, Kenichi
Yamamoto, Hiromi
author_facet Rose, Steven K.
Popp, Alexander
Fujimori, Shinichiro
Havlik, Petr
Weyant, John
Wise, Marshall
Van Vuuren, Detlef P.
Brunelle, Thierry
Cui, Ryna Yiyun
Daioglou, Vassilis
Frank, Stefan
Hasegawa, Tomoko
Humpenöder, Florian
Kato, Etsushi
Sands, Ronald D.
Sano, Fuminori
Tsutsui, Junichi
Doelman, Jonathan
Muratori, Matteo
Prudhomme, Rémi
Wada, Kenichi
Yamamoto, Hiromi
author_sort Rose, Steven K.
title Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
title_short Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
title_full Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
title_fullStr Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
title_full_unstemmed Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
title_sort global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system
publisher Springer
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/1/Rose2022_Article_GlobalBiomassSupplyModelingFor.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rosestevenk globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT poppalexander globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT fujimorishinichiro globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT havlikpetr globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT weyantjohn globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT wisemarshall globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT vanvuurendetlefp globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT brunellethierry globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT cuirynayiyun globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT daioglouvassilis globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT frankstefan globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT hasegawatomoko globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT humpenoderflorian globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT katoetsushi globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT sandsronaldd globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT sanofuminori globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT tsutsuijunichi globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT doelmanjonathan globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT muratorimatteo globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT prudhommeremi globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT wadakenichi globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
AT yamamotohiromi globalbiomasssupplymodelingforlongrunmanagementoftheclimatesystem
_version_ 1819044670681907200
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6021422024-12-18T13:17:19Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/ Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system. Rose Steven K., Popp Alexander, Fujimori Shinichiro, Havlik Petr, Weyant John, Wise Marshall, Van Vuuren Detlef P., Brunelle Thierry, Cui Ryna Yiyun, Daioglou Vassilis, Frank Stefan, Hasegawa Tomoko, Humpenöder Florian, Kato Etsushi, Sands Ronald D., Sano Fuminori, Tsutsui Junichi, Doelman Jonathan, Muratori Matteo, Prudhomme Rémi, Wada Kenichi, Yamamoto Hiromi. 2022. Climatic Change, 172, 3, 27 p.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9> Global biomass supply modeling for long-run management of the climate system Rose, Steven K. Popp, Alexander Fujimori, Shinichiro Havlik, Petr Weyant, John Wise, Marshall Van Vuuren, Detlef P. Brunelle, Thierry Cui, Ryna Yiyun Daioglou, Vassilis Frank, Stefan Hasegawa, Tomoko Humpenöder, Florian Kato, Etsushi Sands, Ronald D. Sano, Fuminori Tsutsui, Junichi Doelman, Jonathan Muratori, Matteo Prudhomme, Rémi Wada, Kenichi Yamamoto, Hiromi eng 2022 Springer Climatic Change bioénergie biomasse utilisation des terres réduction des émissions changement climatique http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16526 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_926 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1666 Bioenergy is projected to have a prominent, valuable, and maybe essential, role in climate management. However, there is significant variation in projected bioenergy deployment results, as well as concerns about the potential environmental and social implications of supplying biomass. Bioenergy deployment projections are market equilibrium solutions from integrated modeling, yet little is known about the underlying modeling of the supply of biomass as a feedstock for energy use in these modeling frameworks. We undertake a novel diagnostic analysis with ten global models to elucidate, compare, and assess how biomass is supplied within the models used to inform long-run climate management. With experiments that isolate and reveal biomass supply modeling behavior and characteristics (costs, emissions, land use, market effects), we learn about biomass supply tendencies and differences. The insights provide a new level of modeling transparency and understanding of estimated global biomass supplies that informs evaluation of the potential for bioenergy in managing the climate and interpretation of integrated modeling. For each model, we characterize the potential distributions of global biomass supply across regions and feedstock types for increasing levels of quantity supplied, as well as some of the potential societal externalities of supplying biomass. We also evaluate the biomass supply implications of managing these externalities. Finally, we interpret biomass market results from integrated modeling in terms of our new understanding of biomass supply. Overall, we find little consensus between models on where biomass could be cost-effectively produced and the implications. We also reveal model specific biomass supply narratives, with results providing new insights into integrated modeling bioenergy outcomes and differences. The analysis finds that many integrated models are considering and managing emissions and land use externalities of supplying biomass and estimating that environmental and societal trade-offs in the form of land emissions, land conversion, and higher agricultural prices are cost-effective, and to some degree a reality of using biomass, to address climate change. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/602142/1/Rose2022_Article_GlobalBiomassSupplyModelingFor.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9 10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03336-9