A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys

Background: Social contact survey data forms a core component of modern epidemic models: however, there has been little assessment of the potential biases in such data. Methods: We conducted focus groups with university students who had (n = 13) and had never (n = 14) completed a social contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative findings were explored quantitatively by analysing participation data. Results: The opportunity to contribute to COVID-19 research, to be heard and feel useful were frequently reported motivators for participating in the contact survey. Reductions in survey engagement following lifting of COVID-19 restrictions may have occurred because the research was perceived to be less critical and/or because the participants were busier and had more contacts. Having a high number of contacts to report, uncertainty around how to report each contact, and concerns around confidentiality were identified as factors leading to inaccurate reporting. Focus groups participants thought that financial incentives or provision of study results would encourage participation. Conclusions: Incentives could improve engagement with social contact surveys. Qualitative research can inform the format, timing, and wording of surveys to optimise completion and accuracy.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nixon, Emily, Silvonen, Taru, Barreaux, Antoine, Kwiatkowska, Rachel, Trickey, Adam, Thomas, Amy, Ali, Becky, Treneman-Evans, Georgia, Christensen, Hannah, Brooks-Pollock, Ellen, Denford, Sarah
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:S50 - Santé humaine, enquête sanitaire, Enquête pathologique, maladie infectieuse, motivation, participation sociale, analyse de données, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/13/601686.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-601686
record_format koha
spelling dig-cirad-fr-6016862024-01-29T19:05:18Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/ A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys. Nixon Emily, Silvonen Taru, Barreaux Antoine, Kwiatkowska Rachel, Trickey Adam, Thomas Amy, Ali Becky, Treneman-Evans Georgia, Christensen Hannah, Brooks-Pollock Ellen, Denford Sarah. 2022. Epidemics, 41:100635, 11 p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635> A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys Nixon, Emily Silvonen, Taru Barreaux, Antoine Kwiatkowska, Rachel Trickey, Adam Thomas, Amy Ali, Becky Treneman-Evans, Georgia Christensen, Hannah Brooks-Pollock, Ellen Denford, Sarah eng 2022 A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys Epidemics S50 - Santé humaine enquête sanitaire Enquête pathologique maladie infectieuse motivation participation sociale analyse de données http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962 Angleterre Grande-Bretagne http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371 Background: Social contact survey data forms a core component of modern epidemic models: however, there has been little assessment of the potential biases in such data. Methods: We conducted focus groups with university students who had (n = 13) and had never (n = 14) completed a social contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative findings were explored quantitatively by analysing participation data. Results: The opportunity to contribute to COVID-19 research, to be heard and feel useful were frequently reported motivators for participating in the contact survey. Reductions in survey engagement following lifting of COVID-19 restrictions may have occurred because the research was perceived to be less critical and/or because the participants were busier and had more contacts. Having a high number of contacts to report, uncertainty around how to report each contact, and concerns around confidentiality were identified as factors leading to inaccurate reporting. Focus groups participants thought that financial incentives or provision of study results would encourage participation. Conclusions: Incentives could improve engagement with social contact surveys. Qualitative research can inform the format, timing, and wording of surveys to optimise completion and accuracy. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/13/601686.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/purl/https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.29p4r41hm0oz525k33jjvevrrd
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic S50 - Santé humaine
enquête sanitaire
Enquête pathologique
maladie infectieuse
motivation
participation sociale
analyse de données
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371
S50 - Santé humaine
enquête sanitaire
Enquête pathologique
maladie infectieuse
motivation
participation sociale
analyse de données
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371
spellingShingle S50 - Santé humaine
enquête sanitaire
Enquête pathologique
maladie infectieuse
motivation
participation sociale
analyse de données
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371
S50 - Santé humaine
enquête sanitaire
Enquête pathologique
maladie infectieuse
motivation
participation sociale
analyse de données
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371
Nixon, Emily
Silvonen, Taru
Barreaux, Antoine
Kwiatkowska, Rachel
Trickey, Adam
Thomas, Amy
Ali, Becky
Treneman-Evans, Georgia
Christensen, Hannah
Brooks-Pollock, Ellen
Denford, Sarah
A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
description Background: Social contact survey data forms a core component of modern epidemic models: however, there has been little assessment of the potential biases in such data. Methods: We conducted focus groups with university students who had (n = 13) and had never (n = 14) completed a social contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative findings were explored quantitatively by analysing participation data. Results: The opportunity to contribute to COVID-19 research, to be heard and feel useful were frequently reported motivators for participating in the contact survey. Reductions in survey engagement following lifting of COVID-19 restrictions may have occurred because the research was perceived to be less critical and/or because the participants were busier and had more contacts. Having a high number of contacts to report, uncertainty around how to report each contact, and concerns around confidentiality were identified as factors leading to inaccurate reporting. Focus groups participants thought that financial incentives or provision of study results would encourage participation. Conclusions: Incentives could improve engagement with social contact surveys. Qualitative research can inform the format, timing, and wording of surveys to optimise completion and accuracy.
format article
topic_facet S50 - Santé humaine
enquête sanitaire
Enquête pathologique
maladie infectieuse
motivation
participation sociale
analyse de données
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_e470dc64
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28665
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_34024
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4953
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14373
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15962
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2574
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3371
author Nixon, Emily
Silvonen, Taru
Barreaux, Antoine
Kwiatkowska, Rachel
Trickey, Adam
Thomas, Amy
Ali, Becky
Treneman-Evans, Georgia
Christensen, Hannah
Brooks-Pollock, Ellen
Denford, Sarah
author_facet Nixon, Emily
Silvonen, Taru
Barreaux, Antoine
Kwiatkowska, Rachel
Trickey, Adam
Thomas, Amy
Ali, Becky
Treneman-Evans, Georgia
Christensen, Hannah
Brooks-Pollock, Ellen
Denford, Sarah
author_sort Nixon, Emily
title A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
title_short A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
title_full A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
title_fullStr A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
title_sort mixed methods analysis of participation in social contact surveys
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/601686/13/601686.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nixonemily amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT silvonentaru amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT barreauxantoine amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT kwiatkowskarachel amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT trickeyadam amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT thomasamy amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT alibecky amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT trenemanevansgeorgia amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT christensenhannah amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT brookspollockellen amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT denfordsarah amixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT nixonemily mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT silvonentaru mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT barreauxantoine mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT kwiatkowskarachel mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT trickeyadam mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT thomasamy mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT alibecky mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT trenemanevansgeorgia mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT christensenhannah mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT brookspollockellen mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
AT denfordsarah mixedmethodsanalysisofparticipationinsocialcontactsurveys
_version_ 1792500399626780672