How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems

CONTEXT: Agricultural systems can provide ecosystem services (ES) beneficial for both the sustainability of farms and the quality of life for humans. Agriculture is regularly criticized for focusing technical management of cropping systems more on production services than on support or regulation services. To achieve the agroecological intensification of cropping systems, a joint provision of multiple ES is required. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to (i) understand the determinants of the provision of ES and (ii) analyze the relationships between these services in order to (iii) identify agroecological intensification pathways. We focused our study on four ES, which are (1) coffee production, (2) water quality preservation, (3) carbon sequestration and (4) biodiversity conservation, provided by coffee agroforestry systems in a small region in Nicaragua. METHODS: A two-phase sampling scheme was implemented to measure and elucidate the provision of these services. First, we selected a large sample (82 coffee plots) to gain insight into and quantify the four ES. Secondly, we extracted a sub-sample (27 plots) showing variability in the provision of the four ES, to closely examine the determinants of the service most useful to farmers, coffee production. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The results showed that carbon sequestration (in average 36 t.ha−1.yr−1) was not correlated with coffee yield (in average 1127 kg.ha−1.yr−1) and depended more on the presence of a few big trees in farm plots (Ø > 0.9 m) than on tree density. Yield increased with tree biodiversity up to a threshold (Shindex = 1.5), after which it clearly declined. The use of the most harmful pesticides to human health at higher doses than recommended did not lead to the highest yields. The most important determinants of coffee production were soil nitrogen content, soil pH, solar radiation, disease and weed incidence. Although reducing the shade tree density increased coffee production, this reduction was not necessarily related to a decrease in shade tree biodiversity and carbon sequestration, or an increase in water contamination potential. A few farmers actually achieved such high joint ES provision, in particular by selecting adequate shade trees grown at moderate densities. SIGNIFICANCE: The novelty of this article lies on an original method that consists in analyzing the ES provided by cropping systems in order to identify management strategies that are effective in providing a higher combined level of ES than those currently provided. We emphasize the importance of linking agricultural practices to the ES delivered, in order to gain an in-depth understanding of which technical levers are positively correlated with the determinants of the expected services.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Notaro, Martin, Gary, Christian, Le Coq, Jean-François, Metay, Aurélie, Rapidel, Bruno
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, système d'exploitation agricole, systèmes agroforestiers, agroforesterie, services écosystémiques, agriculture durable, agroécologie, système de culture, intensification, Coffea, rendement des cultures, conservation de l'eau, conservation de la diversité biologique, séquestration du carbone, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/1/Notaro%202022%2C%20How%20to%20increase%20the%20joint%20provision%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20by%20agricultural%20systems.%20Evidence%20from%20coffee-based%20agroforestry%20systems.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-599849
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
système d'exploitation agricole
systèmes agroforestiers
agroforesterie
services écosystémiques
agriculture durable
agroécologie
système de culture
intensification
Coffea
rendement des cultures
conservation de l'eau
conservation de la diversité biologique
séquestration du carbone
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
système d'exploitation agricole
systèmes agroforestiers
agroforesterie
services écosystémiques
agriculture durable
agroécologie
système de culture
intensification
Coffea
rendement des cultures
conservation de l'eau
conservation de la diversité biologique
séquestration du carbone
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
spellingShingle F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
système d'exploitation agricole
systèmes agroforestiers
agroforesterie
services écosystémiques
agriculture durable
agroécologie
système de culture
intensification
Coffea
rendement des cultures
conservation de l'eau
conservation de la diversité biologique
séquestration du carbone
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
système d'exploitation agricole
systèmes agroforestiers
agroforesterie
services écosystémiques
agriculture durable
agroécologie
système de culture
intensification
Coffea
rendement des cultures
conservation de l'eau
conservation de la diversité biologique
séquestration du carbone
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
Notaro, Martin
Gary, Christian
Le Coq, Jean-François
Metay, Aurélie
Rapidel, Bruno
How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
description CONTEXT: Agricultural systems can provide ecosystem services (ES) beneficial for both the sustainability of farms and the quality of life for humans. Agriculture is regularly criticized for focusing technical management of cropping systems more on production services than on support or regulation services. To achieve the agroecological intensification of cropping systems, a joint provision of multiple ES is required. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to (i) understand the determinants of the provision of ES and (ii) analyze the relationships between these services in order to (iii) identify agroecological intensification pathways. We focused our study on four ES, which are (1) coffee production, (2) water quality preservation, (3) carbon sequestration and (4) biodiversity conservation, provided by coffee agroforestry systems in a small region in Nicaragua. METHODS: A two-phase sampling scheme was implemented to measure and elucidate the provision of these services. First, we selected a large sample (82 coffee plots) to gain insight into and quantify the four ES. Secondly, we extracted a sub-sample (27 plots) showing variability in the provision of the four ES, to closely examine the determinants of the service most useful to farmers, coffee production. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The results showed that carbon sequestration (in average 36 t.ha−1.yr−1) was not correlated with coffee yield (in average 1127 kg.ha−1.yr−1) and depended more on the presence of a few big trees in farm plots (Ø > 0.9 m) than on tree density. Yield increased with tree biodiversity up to a threshold (Shindex = 1.5), after which it clearly declined. The use of the most harmful pesticides to human health at higher doses than recommended did not lead to the highest yields. The most important determinants of coffee production were soil nitrogen content, soil pH, solar radiation, disease and weed incidence. Although reducing the shade tree density increased coffee production, this reduction was not necessarily related to a decrease in shade tree biodiversity and carbon sequestration, or an increase in water contamination potential. A few farmers actually achieved such high joint ES provision, in particular by selecting adequate shade trees grown at moderate densities. SIGNIFICANCE: The novelty of this article lies on an original method that consists in analyzing the ES provided by cropping systems in order to identify management strategies that are effective in providing a higher combined level of ES than those currently provided. We emphasize the importance of linking agricultural practices to the ES delivered, in order to gain an in-depth understanding of which technical levers are positively correlated with the determinants of the expected services.
format article
topic_facet F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
système d'exploitation agricole
systèmes agroforestiers
agroforesterie
services écosystémiques
agriculture durable
agroécologie
système de culture
intensification
Coffea
rendement des cultures
conservation de l'eau
conservation de la diversité biologique
séquestration du carbone
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171
author Notaro, Martin
Gary, Christian
Le Coq, Jean-François
Metay, Aurélie
Rapidel, Bruno
author_facet Notaro, Martin
Gary, Christian
Le Coq, Jean-François
Metay, Aurélie
Rapidel, Bruno
author_sort Notaro, Martin
title How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
title_short How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
title_full How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
title_fullStr How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
title_full_unstemmed How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
title_sort how to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/1/Notaro%202022%2C%20How%20to%20increase%20the%20joint%20provision%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20by%20agricultural%20systems.%20Evidence%20from%20coffee-based%20agroforestry%20systems.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT notaromartin howtoincreasethejointprovisionofecosystemservicesbyagriculturalsystemsevidencefromcoffeebasedagroforestrysystems
AT garychristian howtoincreasethejointprovisionofecosystemservicesbyagriculturalsystemsevidencefromcoffeebasedagroforestrysystems
AT lecoqjeanfrancois howtoincreasethejointprovisionofecosystemservicesbyagriculturalsystemsevidencefromcoffeebasedagroforestrysystems
AT metayaurelie howtoincreasethejointprovisionofecosystemservicesbyagriculturalsystemsevidencefromcoffeebasedagroforestrysystems
AT rapidelbruno howtoincreasethejointprovisionofecosystemservicesbyagriculturalsystemsevidencefromcoffeebasedagroforestrysystems
_version_ 1792500273304829952
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5998492024-01-29T19:02:39Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/ How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems. Notaro Martin, Gary Christian, Le Coq Jean-François, Metay Aurélie, Rapidel Bruno. 2022. Agricultural Systems, 196:103332, 12 p.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332> How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems Notaro, Martin Gary, Christian Le Coq, Jean-François Metay, Aurélie Rapidel, Bruno eng 2022 Agricultural Systems F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières système d'exploitation agricole systèmes agroforestiers agroforesterie services écosystémiques agriculture durable agroécologie système de culture intensification Coffea rendement des cultures conservation de l'eau conservation de la diversité biologique séquestration du carbone http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2807 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_330982 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33561 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_92381 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33485 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1720 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_10176 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8315 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33955 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_331583 Nicaragua http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5171 CONTEXT: Agricultural systems can provide ecosystem services (ES) beneficial for both the sustainability of farms and the quality of life for humans. Agriculture is regularly criticized for focusing technical management of cropping systems more on production services than on support or regulation services. To achieve the agroecological intensification of cropping systems, a joint provision of multiple ES is required. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to (i) understand the determinants of the provision of ES and (ii) analyze the relationships between these services in order to (iii) identify agroecological intensification pathways. We focused our study on four ES, which are (1) coffee production, (2) water quality preservation, (3) carbon sequestration and (4) biodiversity conservation, provided by coffee agroforestry systems in a small region in Nicaragua. METHODS: A two-phase sampling scheme was implemented to measure and elucidate the provision of these services. First, we selected a large sample (82 coffee plots) to gain insight into and quantify the four ES. Secondly, we extracted a sub-sample (27 plots) showing variability in the provision of the four ES, to closely examine the determinants of the service most useful to farmers, coffee production. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The results showed that carbon sequestration (in average 36 t.ha−1.yr−1) was not correlated with coffee yield (in average 1127 kg.ha−1.yr−1) and depended more on the presence of a few big trees in farm plots (Ø > 0.9 m) than on tree density. Yield increased with tree biodiversity up to a threshold (Shindex = 1.5), after which it clearly declined. The use of the most harmful pesticides to human health at higher doses than recommended did not lead to the highest yields. The most important determinants of coffee production were soil nitrogen content, soil pH, solar radiation, disease and weed incidence. Although reducing the shade tree density increased coffee production, this reduction was not necessarily related to a decrease in shade tree biodiversity and carbon sequestration, or an increase in water contamination potential. A few farmers actually achieved such high joint ES provision, in particular by selecting adequate shade trees grown at moderate densities. SIGNIFICANCE: The novelty of this article lies on an original method that consists in analyzing the ES provided by cropping systems in order to identify management strategies that are effective in providing a higher combined level of ES than those currently provided. We emphasize the importance of linking agricultural practices to the ES delivered, in order to gain an in-depth understanding of which technical levers are positively correlated with the determinants of the expected services. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/599849/1/Notaro%202022%2C%20How%20to%20increase%20the%20joint%20provision%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20by%20agricultural%20systems.%20Evidence%20from%20coffee-based%20agroforestry%20systems.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103332