Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis

Purpose: Coffee represents an important trade asset internationally. Around 70% of global coffee production is provided by 25 million smallholders farmers. In recent decades, coffee systems have been transformed into more intensified systems of coffee monoculture. The general objectives of this paper are to provide a better picture of the traditional coffee cropping systems and postharvest processes on-farm and to assess the environmental impacts, integrating the diversity of smallholder cropping systems. Methods: A Life Cycle Assessment from cradle to farm gate was performed for three cropping systems representative of Colombian coffee cultivation according to the associated crops and shadow trees: coffee alone (CA), coffee with transition shade (CTS), and coffee with permanent shade (CPS). The system studied includes inputs, agricultural production and postharvest operations using the wet method. The final product of farms is parchment bean coffee at farm gate. The technology used is representative of the average practices of smallholder coffee growers in the region. To address multiple functions of coffee, three functional units (FU) were selected: area by time (ha*year−1 unit area), productivity (ton of parchment coffee) and farmers income (1000 USD$). Seven midpoint categories were selected: climate change, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, and water resource depletion. Results and discussion: We present the life cycle inventory and impact assessment results from three types of cropping systems CA, CTS and CPS. For all FU, the CPS system has the lowest potential impact, excepted for marine eutrophication. CPS also has the highest coffee yields, however it has also the highest costs. Even if cropping system diversification is only one of multiple factors that influence environmental performance, agroforestry seems to be a promising path to reduce and mitigate environmental impacts by decreasing off-fam contributions (input fabrication). Conclusions: Results show the possibility that diversified cropping systems have an influence when assessing potential environmental impacts of coffee at farm gate and differences found might be influenced by shading in traditional coffee systems. Future work is needed to consider the real potential of CTS cropping system including land use and carbon dynamics. Assessments including social indicators and the rest of the value chain in particular coffee industrial transformation and utilization are also needed since the consumption stages are also a key driver to reduce the environmental footprint of coffee.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acosta Alba, Ivonne, Boissy, Joachim, Chia, Eduardo, Andrieu, Nadine
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture, K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, Coffea arabica, système de culture, agroforesterie, arbre d'ombrage, petite exploitation agricole, analyse du cycle de vie, culture associée, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/7/594313.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-594313
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
Coffea arabica
système de culture
agroforesterie
arbre d'ombrage
petite exploitation agricole
analyse du cycle de vie
culture associée
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
Coffea arabica
système de culture
agroforesterie
arbre d'ombrage
petite exploitation agricole
analyse du cycle de vie
culture associée
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767
spellingShingle F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
Coffea arabica
système de culture
agroforesterie
arbre d'ombrage
petite exploitation agricole
analyse du cycle de vie
culture associée
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767
F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
Coffea arabica
système de culture
agroforesterie
arbre d'ombrage
petite exploitation agricole
analyse du cycle de vie
culture associée
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767
Acosta Alba, Ivonne
Boissy, Joachim
Chia, Eduardo
Andrieu, Nadine
Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
description Purpose: Coffee represents an important trade asset internationally. Around 70% of global coffee production is provided by 25 million smallholders farmers. In recent decades, coffee systems have been transformed into more intensified systems of coffee monoculture. The general objectives of this paper are to provide a better picture of the traditional coffee cropping systems and postharvest processes on-farm and to assess the environmental impacts, integrating the diversity of smallholder cropping systems. Methods: A Life Cycle Assessment from cradle to farm gate was performed for three cropping systems representative of Colombian coffee cultivation according to the associated crops and shadow trees: coffee alone (CA), coffee with transition shade (CTS), and coffee with permanent shade (CPS). The system studied includes inputs, agricultural production and postharvest operations using the wet method. The final product of farms is parchment bean coffee at farm gate. The technology used is representative of the average practices of smallholder coffee growers in the region. To address multiple functions of coffee, three functional units (FU) were selected: area by time (ha*year−1 unit area), productivity (ton of parchment coffee) and farmers income (1000 USD$). Seven midpoint categories were selected: climate change, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, and water resource depletion. Results and discussion: We present the life cycle inventory and impact assessment results from three types of cropping systems CA, CTS and CPS. For all FU, the CPS system has the lowest potential impact, excepted for marine eutrophication. CPS also has the highest coffee yields, however it has also the highest costs. Even if cropping system diversification is only one of multiple factors that influence environmental performance, agroforestry seems to be a promising path to reduce and mitigate environmental impacts by decreasing off-fam contributions (input fabrication). Conclusions: Results show the possibility that diversified cropping systems have an influence when assessing potential environmental impacts of coffee at farm gate and differences found might be influenced by shading in traditional coffee systems. Future work is needed to consider the real potential of CTS cropping system including land use and carbon dynamics. Assessments including social indicators and the rest of the value chain in particular coffee industrial transformation and utilization are also needed since the consumption stages are also a key driver to reduce the environmental footprint of coffee.
format article
topic_facet F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
Coffea arabica
système de culture
agroforesterie
arbre d'ombrage
petite exploitation agricole
analyse du cycle de vie
culture associée
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767
author Acosta Alba, Ivonne
Boissy, Joachim
Chia, Eduardo
Andrieu, Nadine
author_facet Acosta Alba, Ivonne
Boissy, Joachim
Chia, Eduardo
Andrieu, Nadine
author_sort Acosta Alba, Ivonne
title Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
title_short Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
title_full Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
title_fullStr Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
title_full_unstemmed Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
title_sort integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/7/594313.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT acostaalbaivonne integratingdiversityofsmallholdercoffeecroppingsystemsinenvironmentalanalysis
AT boissyjoachim integratingdiversityofsmallholdercoffeecroppingsystemsinenvironmentalanalysis
AT chiaeduardo integratingdiversityofsmallholdercoffeecroppingsystemsinenvironmentalanalysis
AT andrieunadine integratingdiversityofsmallholdercoffeecroppingsystemsinenvironmentalanalysis
_version_ 1792499860084097024
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5943132024-01-29T02:26:48Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/ Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis. Acosta Alba Ivonne, Boissy Joachim, Chia Eduardo, Andrieu Nadine. 2020. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25 : 252-266.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5> Integrating diversity of smallholder coffee cropping systems in environmental analysis Acosta Alba, Ivonne Boissy, Joachim Chia, Eduardo Andrieu, Nadine eng 2020 International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment F08 - Systèmes et modes de culture K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales Coffea arabica système de culture agroforesterie arbre d'ombrage petite exploitation agricole analyse du cycle de vie culture associée http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1721 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1971 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_207 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_25548 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7113 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000105 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35927 Colombie http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1767 Purpose: Coffee represents an important trade asset internationally. Around 70% of global coffee production is provided by 25 million smallholders farmers. In recent decades, coffee systems have been transformed into more intensified systems of coffee monoculture. The general objectives of this paper are to provide a better picture of the traditional coffee cropping systems and postharvest processes on-farm and to assess the environmental impacts, integrating the diversity of smallholder cropping systems. Methods: A Life Cycle Assessment from cradle to farm gate was performed for three cropping systems representative of Colombian coffee cultivation according to the associated crops and shadow trees: coffee alone (CA), coffee with transition shade (CTS), and coffee with permanent shade (CPS). The system studied includes inputs, agricultural production and postharvest operations using the wet method. The final product of farms is parchment bean coffee at farm gate. The technology used is representative of the average practices of smallholder coffee growers in the region. To address multiple functions of coffee, three functional units (FU) were selected: area by time (ha*year−1 unit area), productivity (ton of parchment coffee) and farmers income (1000 USD$). Seven midpoint categories were selected: climate change, acidification, terrestrial eutrophication, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, and water resource depletion. Results and discussion: We present the life cycle inventory and impact assessment results from three types of cropping systems CA, CTS and CPS. For all FU, the CPS system has the lowest potential impact, excepted for marine eutrophication. CPS also has the highest coffee yields, however it has also the highest costs. Even if cropping system diversification is only one of multiple factors that influence environmental performance, agroforestry seems to be a promising path to reduce and mitigate environmental impacts by decreasing off-fam contributions (input fabrication). Conclusions: Results show the possibility that diversified cropping systems have an influence when assessing potential environmental impacts of coffee at farm gate and differences found might be influenced by shading in traditional coffee systems. Future work is needed to consider the real potential of CTS cropping system including land use and carbon dynamics. Assessments including social indicators and the rest of the value chain in particular coffee industrial transformation and utilization are also needed since the consumption stages are also a key driver to reduce the environmental footprint of coffee. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/594313/7/594313.pdf text cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5 10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01689-5