A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy

Tropical forests are major providers of natural resources and ecosystem services but their ecological functions are at threat, due to increasing human pressure linked to economic development. The identification of priority areas for conservation is crucial for land use planning to ensure the protection of biodiversity and ecological function. Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs), as defined by Greenpeace and World Resources Institute (WRI), are areas of the forest ecosystems not subjected to human activities. They have been identified by mapping human disturbances through remote sensing. Contrary to similar global-scale concepts, IFLs have been integrated into the standards of the certification body Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and therefore have practical implications for forest management policies. The Motion 65, approved in the general assembly of FSC in 2014, mandates the protection of IFLs located in FSC certified logging concessions. Until the implementation of national standards, forestry operations are banished from 80% of the IFL area within each forest management unit. To trace the history and evaluate the suitability of IFLs in the Central African context, we searched for documents related to the IFL method, and related approaches focusing on the identification of areas devoid of human disturbances. The IFL method is simple and cost-effective and allows for a global assessment of the influence of human infrastructures and industrial exploitation on forests. However, the method does not consider the situation below the canopy and those forest components not visible by satellites. For example, hunting, one of the main threats faced by wildlife in Central African forests today, cannot be detected with satellite imagery. On the other hand, other anthropogenic activities which remote sensing may detect may be compatible with forest ecosystem conservation. To better tailor the IFL approach to Central African forests, we recommend (i) the consideration of wildlife communities in the intactness analysis, (ii) a thorough evaluation of the impacts of human activities on forest ecosystems, and (iii) the integration of local stakeholders and governments in the design of land management strategies to respond to social, economic and environmental needs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haurez, Barbara, Daïnou, Kasso, Vermeulen, Cédric, Kleinschroth, Fritz, Mortier, Frédéric, Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie, Doucet, Jean-Louis
Format: article biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, E11 - Économie et politique foncières, E14 - Économie et politique du développement, forêt, forêt tropicale, politique forestière, forêt protégée, gestion des ressources naturelles, gestion des ressources, utilisation des terres, urbanisation, abattage d'arbres, aménagement forestier, impact sur l'environnement, politique de développement, écosystème forestier, services écosystémiques, protection de la forêt, approche participative, zone protégée, politique de l'environnement, exploitation forestière, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775, http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432,
Online Access:http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/1/1-s2.0-S1389934116303008-main.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cirad-fr-584236
record_format koha
institution CIRAD FR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cirad-fr
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CIRAD Francia
language eng
topic K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
forêt
forêt tropicale
politique forestière
forêt protégée
gestion des ressources naturelles
gestion des ressources
utilisation des terres
urbanisation
abattage d'arbres
aménagement forestier
impact sur l'environnement
politique de développement
écosystème forestier
services écosystémiques
protection de la forêt
approche participative
zone protégée
politique de l'environnement
exploitation forestière
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
forêt
forêt tropicale
politique forestière
forêt protégée
gestion des ressources naturelles
gestion des ressources
utilisation des terres
urbanisation
abattage d'arbres
aménagement forestier
impact sur l'environnement
politique de développement
écosystème forestier
services écosystémiques
protection de la forêt
approche participative
zone protégée
politique de l'environnement
exploitation forestière
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432
spellingShingle K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
forêt
forêt tropicale
politique forestière
forêt protégée
gestion des ressources naturelles
gestion des ressources
utilisation des terres
urbanisation
abattage d'arbres
aménagement forestier
impact sur l'environnement
politique de développement
écosystème forestier
services écosystémiques
protection de la forêt
approche participative
zone protégée
politique de l'environnement
exploitation forestière
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432
K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
forêt
forêt tropicale
politique forestière
forêt protégée
gestion des ressources naturelles
gestion des ressources
utilisation des terres
urbanisation
abattage d'arbres
aménagement forestier
impact sur l'environnement
politique de développement
écosystème forestier
services écosystémiques
protection de la forêt
approche participative
zone protégée
politique de l'environnement
exploitation forestière
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432
Haurez, Barbara
Daïnou, Kasso
Vermeulen, Cédric
Kleinschroth, Fritz
Mortier, Frédéric
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Doucet, Jean-Louis
A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
description Tropical forests are major providers of natural resources and ecosystem services but their ecological functions are at threat, due to increasing human pressure linked to economic development. The identification of priority areas for conservation is crucial for land use planning to ensure the protection of biodiversity and ecological function. Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs), as defined by Greenpeace and World Resources Institute (WRI), are areas of the forest ecosystems not subjected to human activities. They have been identified by mapping human disturbances through remote sensing. Contrary to similar global-scale concepts, IFLs have been integrated into the standards of the certification body Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and therefore have practical implications for forest management policies. The Motion 65, approved in the general assembly of FSC in 2014, mandates the protection of IFLs located in FSC certified logging concessions. Until the implementation of national standards, forestry operations are banished from 80% of the IFL area within each forest management unit. To trace the history and evaluate the suitability of IFLs in the Central African context, we searched for documents related to the IFL method, and related approaches focusing on the identification of areas devoid of human disturbances. The IFL method is simple and cost-effective and allows for a global assessment of the influence of human infrastructures and industrial exploitation on forests. However, the method does not consider the situation below the canopy and those forest components not visible by satellites. For example, hunting, one of the main threats faced by wildlife in Central African forests today, cannot be detected with satellite imagery. On the other hand, other anthropogenic activities which remote sensing may detect may be compatible with forest ecosystem conservation. To better tailor the IFL approach to Central African forests, we recommend (i) the consideration of wildlife communities in the intactness analysis, (ii) a thorough evaluation of the impacts of human activities on forest ecosystems, and (iii) the integration of local stakeholders and governments in the design of land management strategies to respond to social, economic and environmental needs.
format article
topic_facet K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales
P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières
E11 - Économie et politique foncières
E14 - Économie et politique du développement
forêt
forêt tropicale
politique forestière
forêt protégée
gestion des ressources naturelles
gestion des ressources
utilisation des terres
urbanisation
abattage d'arbres
aménagement forestier
impact sur l'environnement
politique de développement
écosystème forestier
services écosystémiques
protection de la forêt
approche participative
zone protégée
politique de l'environnement
exploitation forestière
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775
http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432
author Haurez, Barbara
Daïnou, Kasso
Vermeulen, Cédric
Kleinschroth, Fritz
Mortier, Frédéric
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Doucet, Jean-Louis
author_facet Haurez, Barbara
Daïnou, Kasso
Vermeulen, Cédric
Kleinschroth, Fritz
Mortier, Frédéric
Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie
Doucet, Jean-Louis
author_sort Haurez, Barbara
title A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
title_short A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
title_full A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
title_fullStr A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
title_full_unstemmed A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy
title_sort look at intact forest landscapes (ifls) and their relevance in central african forest policy
url http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/
http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/1/1-s2.0-S1389934116303008-main.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT haurezbarbara alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT dainoukasso alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT vermeulencedric alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT kleinschrothfritz alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT mortierfrederic alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT gourletfleurysylvie alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT doucetjeanlouis alookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT haurezbarbara lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT dainoukasso lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT vermeulencedric lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT kleinschrothfritz lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT mortierfrederic lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT gourletfleurysylvie lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
AT doucetjeanlouis lookatintactforestlandscapesiflsandtheirrelevanceincentralafricanforestpolicy
_version_ 1792499271529922560
spelling dig-cirad-fr-5842362024-01-29T00:15:59Z http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/ http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/ A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy. Haurez Barbara, Daïnou Kasso, Vermeulen Cédric, Kleinschroth Fritz, Mortier Frédéric, Gourlet-Fleury Sylvie, Doucet Jean-Louis. 2017. Forest Policy and Economics, 80 : 192-199.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021> A look at Intact forest Landscapes (IFLs) and their relevance in Central African forest policy Haurez, Barbara Daïnou, Kasso Vermeulen, Cédric Kleinschroth, Fritz Mortier, Frédéric Gourlet-Fleury, Sylvie Doucet, Jean-Louis eng 2017 Forest Policy and Economics K01 - Foresterie - Considérations générales P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières E11 - Économie et politique foncières E14 - Économie et politique du développement forêt forêt tropicale politique forestière forêt protégée gestion des ressources naturelles gestion des ressources utilisation des terres urbanisation abattage d'arbres aménagement forestier impact sur l'environnement politique de développement écosystème forestier services écosystémiques protection de la forêt approche participative zone protégée politique de l'environnement exploitation forestière http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3062 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24904 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3060 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28126 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000115 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_6524 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4182 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8088 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2847 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_16129 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_24420 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2228 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1374842133961 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1348040570280 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_28075 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_9000119 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_37952 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2597 http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7775 Afrique centrale http://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1432 Tropical forests are major providers of natural resources and ecosystem services but their ecological functions are at threat, due to increasing human pressure linked to economic development. The identification of priority areas for conservation is crucial for land use planning to ensure the protection of biodiversity and ecological function. Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs), as defined by Greenpeace and World Resources Institute (WRI), are areas of the forest ecosystems not subjected to human activities. They have been identified by mapping human disturbances through remote sensing. Contrary to similar global-scale concepts, IFLs have been integrated into the standards of the certification body Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and therefore have practical implications for forest management policies. The Motion 65, approved in the general assembly of FSC in 2014, mandates the protection of IFLs located in FSC certified logging concessions. Until the implementation of national standards, forestry operations are banished from 80% of the IFL area within each forest management unit. To trace the history and evaluate the suitability of IFLs in the Central African context, we searched for documents related to the IFL method, and related approaches focusing on the identification of areas devoid of human disturbances. The IFL method is simple and cost-effective and allows for a global assessment of the influence of human infrastructures and industrial exploitation on forests. However, the method does not consider the situation below the canopy and those forest components not visible by satellites. For example, hunting, one of the main threats faced by wildlife in Central African forests today, cannot be detected with satellite imagery. On the other hand, other anthropogenic activities which remote sensing may detect may be compatible with forest ecosystem conservation. To better tailor the IFL approach to Central African forests, we recommend (i) the consideration of wildlife communities in the intactness analysis, (ii) a thorough evaluation of the impacts of human activities on forest ecosystems, and (iii) the integration of local stakeholders and governments in the design of land management strategies to respond to social, economic and environmental needs. article info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal Article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://agritrop.cirad.fr/584236/1/1-s2.0-S1389934116303008-main.pdf text Cirad license info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess https://agritrop.cirad.fr/mention_legale.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/purl/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.021