Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction

Multi-environment trials are routinely conducted in plant breeding to select candidates for the next selection cycle. In this study, we compare the prediction accuracy of four developed genomic-enabled prediction models: (1) single-environment, main genotypic effect model (SM); (2) multi-environment, main genotypic effects model (MM); (3) multi-environment, single variance G×E deviation model (MDs); and (4) multi-environment, environment-specific variance G×E deviation model (MDe). Each of these four models were fitted using two kernel methods: a linear kernel Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, GBLUP (GB), and a nonlinear kernel Gaussian kernel (GK). The eight model-method combinations were applied to two extensive Brazilian maize data sets (HEL and USP data sets), having different numbers of maize hybrids evaluated in different environments for grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH). Results show that the MDe and the MDs models fitted with the Gaussian kernel (MDe-GK, and MDs-GK) had the highest prediction accuracy. For GY in the HEL data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 9 to 32%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 9 to 49%. For GY in the USP data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 0 to 7%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 34 to 70%. For traits PH and EH, gains in prediction accuracy of models with GK compared to models with GB were smaller than those achieved in GY. Also, these gains in prediction accuracy decreased when a more difficult prediction problem was studied.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bandeira e Sousa, M., Cuevas, J., De Oliveira Couto, E.G., Perez-Rodriguez, P., Jarquín, D., Fritsche-Neto, R., Burgueño, J., Crossa, J.
Format: Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Genetics Society of America 2017
Subjects:AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, Linear Kernel, Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel, Genomic Selection, GenPred, Shared Data Resources, GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION, STATISTICAL METHODS, ARTIFICIAL SELECTION, GENOMICS, DATA ANALYSIS, FORECASTING,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cimmyt-10883-19328
record_format koha
spelling dig-cimmyt-10883-193282023-12-08T15:05:56Z Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction Bandeira e Sousa, M. Cuevas, J. De Oliveira Couto, E.G. Perez-Rodriguez, P. Jarquín, D. Fritsche-Neto, R. Burgueño, J. Crossa, J. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor Linear Kernel Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel Genomic Selection GenPred Shared Data Resources GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION STATISTICAL METHODS ARTIFICIAL SELECTION GENOMICS DATA ANALYSIS FORECASTING Multi-environment trials are routinely conducted in plant breeding to select candidates for the next selection cycle. In this study, we compare the prediction accuracy of four developed genomic-enabled prediction models: (1) single-environment, main genotypic effect model (SM); (2) multi-environment, main genotypic effects model (MM); (3) multi-environment, single variance G×E deviation model (MDs); and (4) multi-environment, environment-specific variance G×E deviation model (MDe). Each of these four models were fitted using two kernel methods: a linear kernel Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, GBLUP (GB), and a nonlinear kernel Gaussian kernel (GK). The eight model-method combinations were applied to two extensive Brazilian maize data sets (HEL and USP data sets), having different numbers of maize hybrids evaluated in different environments for grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH). Results show that the MDe and the MDs models fitted with the Gaussian kernel (MDe-GK, and MDs-GK) had the highest prediction accuracy. For GY in the HEL data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 9 to 32%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 9 to 49%. For GY in the USP data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 0 to 7%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 34 to 70%. For traits PH and EH, gains in prediction accuracy of models with GK compared to models with GB were smaller than those achieved in GY. Also, these gains in prediction accuracy decreased when a more difficult prediction problem was studied. 1995-2014 2018-03-23T21:26:22Z 2018-03-23T21:26:22Z 2017 Article 2160-1836 https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19328 10.1534/g3.117.042341 English http://hdl.handle.net/11529/10887 CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. Open Access PDF Bethesda, Maryland, U.S. Genetics Society of America 6 7 G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
institution CIMMYT
collection DSpace
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname CIMMYT Library
language English
topic AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
Linear Kernel
Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel
Genomic Selection
GenPred
Shared Data Resources
GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
STATISTICAL METHODS
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
GENOMICS
DATA ANALYSIS
FORECASTING
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
Linear Kernel
Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel
Genomic Selection
GenPred
Shared Data Resources
GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
STATISTICAL METHODS
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
GENOMICS
DATA ANALYSIS
FORECASTING
spellingShingle AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
Linear Kernel
Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel
Genomic Selection
GenPred
Shared Data Resources
GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
STATISTICAL METHODS
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
GENOMICS
DATA ANALYSIS
FORECASTING
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
Linear Kernel
Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel
Genomic Selection
GenPred
Shared Data Resources
GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
STATISTICAL METHODS
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
GENOMICS
DATA ANALYSIS
FORECASTING
Bandeira e Sousa, M.
Cuevas, J.
De Oliveira Couto, E.G.
Perez-Rodriguez, P.
Jarquín, D.
Fritsche-Neto, R.
Burgueño, J.
Crossa, J.
Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
description Multi-environment trials are routinely conducted in plant breeding to select candidates for the next selection cycle. In this study, we compare the prediction accuracy of four developed genomic-enabled prediction models: (1) single-environment, main genotypic effect model (SM); (2) multi-environment, main genotypic effects model (MM); (3) multi-environment, single variance G×E deviation model (MDs); and (4) multi-environment, environment-specific variance G×E deviation model (MDe). Each of these four models were fitted using two kernel methods: a linear kernel Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, GBLUP (GB), and a nonlinear kernel Gaussian kernel (GK). The eight model-method combinations were applied to two extensive Brazilian maize data sets (HEL and USP data sets), having different numbers of maize hybrids evaluated in different environments for grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH). Results show that the MDe and the MDs models fitted with the Gaussian kernel (MDe-GK, and MDs-GK) had the highest prediction accuracy. For GY in the HEL data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 9 to 32%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 9 to 49%. For GY in the USP data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 0 to 7%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 34 to 70%. For traits PH and EH, gains in prediction accuracy of models with GK compared to models with GB were smaller than those achieved in GY. Also, these gains in prediction accuracy decreased when a more difficult prediction problem was studied.
format Article
topic_facet AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
Linear Kernel
Gaussian Nonlinear Kernel
Genomic Selection
GenPred
Shared Data Resources
GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
STATISTICAL METHODS
ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
GENOMICS
DATA ANALYSIS
FORECASTING
author Bandeira e Sousa, M.
Cuevas, J.
De Oliveira Couto, E.G.
Perez-Rodriguez, P.
Jarquín, D.
Fritsche-Neto, R.
Burgueño, J.
Crossa, J.
author_facet Bandeira e Sousa, M.
Cuevas, J.
De Oliveira Couto, E.G.
Perez-Rodriguez, P.
Jarquín, D.
Fritsche-Neto, R.
Burgueño, J.
Crossa, J.
author_sort Bandeira e Sousa, M.
title Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
title_short Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
title_full Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
title_fullStr Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
title_full_unstemmed Genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
title_sort genomic-enabled prediction in maize using kernel models with genotype x environment interaction
publisher Genetics Society of America
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10883/19328
work_keys_str_mv AT bandeiraesousam genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT cuevasj genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT deoliveiracoutoeg genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT perezrodriguezp genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT jarquind genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT fritschenetor genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT burguenoj genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
AT crossaj genomicenabledpredictioninmaizeusingkernelmodelswithgenotypexenvironmentinteraction
_version_ 1787232938560061440