Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India
The objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to evaluate the GxExM for wheat genotypes; 2) to predict yield performance and identify high stable wheat genotypes in different management practices; and 3) to make genotype-specific management and high performing genotype recommendations within and across agro-ecological regions. A diverse set of twenty-one genotypes was evaluated over three years (2012, 2013 and 2014) under two levels of crop management practices (CT and ZT) across three agro-ecological regions (BR, MP and PB) of India in replicated trials. Data were analyzed with SASGxE and RGxE programs using SAS and R programming languages, respectively. Across and within a location(s), the pattern of GxExM and GxMxY interactions (respectively) among univariate and multivariate stability statistics, grouping of genotypes in divisive clusters and estimates (with a prediction interval) of genotype varied in management practice CT and ZT. Across locations, the genotypes “Munal” and “HD-2967” were the best performers and high stable in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2824” and “DPW-621-50”, and “Munal” may serve as diverse parents for developing high quality, climate smart, locally adapted genotypes for BR in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2932”, “BAZ” and “JW-3288”, and “GW-322” and “HD-2967” are suitable for developing locally adapted stress tolerant genotypes for MP in management practices CT and ZT, respectively. Relatively small GxM and GxExM interactions in PB preclude in making definitive conclusions.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
2017
|
Subjects: | AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, Stability Analysis, GxExM, BLUP, Forest Plots, GGE Biplot, Univariate Stability Statistics, WHEAT, YIELD FACTORS, GENETIC STABILITY, STATISTICAL METHODS, FIELD EXPERIMENTATION, GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION, BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19182 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cimmyt-10883-19182 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cimmyt-10883-191822023-02-02T22:42:05Z Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India Jat, M.L. Jat, R.K. Singh, P. Jat, S.L. Sidhu, H.S. Jat, H.S. Bijarniya, D. Parihar, C.M. Gupta, R.K. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR The objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to evaluate the GxExM for wheat genotypes; 2) to predict yield performance and identify high stable wheat genotypes in different management practices; and 3) to make genotype-specific management and high performing genotype recommendations within and across agro-ecological regions. A diverse set of twenty-one genotypes was evaluated over three years (2012, 2013 and 2014) under two levels of crop management practices (CT and ZT) across three agro-ecological regions (BR, MP and PB) of India in replicated trials. Data were analyzed with SASGxE and RGxE programs using SAS and R programming languages, respectively. Across and within a location(s), the pattern of GxExM and GxMxY interactions (respectively) among univariate and multivariate stability statistics, grouping of genotypes in divisive clusters and estimates (with a prediction interval) of genotype varied in management practice CT and ZT. Across locations, the genotypes “Munal” and “HD-2967” were the best performers and high stable in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2824” and “DPW-621-50”, and “Munal” may serve as diverse parents for developing high quality, climate smart, locally adapted genotypes for BR in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2932”, “BAZ” and “JW-3288”, and “GW-322” and “HD-2967” are suitable for developing locally adapted stress tolerant genotypes for MP in management practices CT and ZT, respectively. Relatively small GxM and GxExM interactions in PB preclude in making definitive conclusions. 1977-2012 2018-01-24T17:39:52Z 2018-01-24T17:39:52Z 2017 Article 2158-2742 2158-2750 http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19182 10.4236/ajps.2017.88133 English https://html.scirp.org/file/_14-2603254_1.htm https://html.scirp.org/file/_14-2603254_2.htm https://html.scirp.org/file/_14-2603254_3.htm https://html.scirp.org/file/_14-2603254_4.htm https://html.scirp.org/file/_14-2603254_5.htm CIMMYT manages Intellectual Assets as International Public Goods. The user is free to download, print, store and share this work. In case you want to translate or create any other derivative work and share or distribute such translation/derivative work, please contact CIMMYT-Knowledge-Center@cgiar.org indicating the work you want to use and the kind of use you intend; CIMMYT will contact you with the suitable license for that purpose. Open Access PDF India U.S. Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 8 8 American Journal of Plant Sciences |
institution |
CIMMYT |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
México |
countrycode |
MX |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cimmyt |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
CIMMYT Library |
language |
English |
topic |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR |
spellingShingle |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR Jat, M.L. Jat, R.K. Singh, P. Jat, S.L. Sidhu, H.S. Jat, H.S. Bijarniya, D. Parihar, C.M. Gupta, R.K. Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
description |
The objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to evaluate the GxExM for wheat genotypes; 2) to predict yield performance and identify high stable wheat genotypes in different management practices; and 3) to make genotype-specific management and high performing genotype recommendations within and across agro-ecological regions. A diverse set of twenty-one genotypes was evaluated over three years (2012, 2013 and 2014) under two levels of crop management practices (CT and ZT) across three agro-ecological regions (BR, MP and PB) of India in replicated trials. Data were analyzed with SASGxE and RGxE programs using SAS and R programming languages, respectively. Across and within a location(s), the pattern of GxExM and GxMxY interactions (respectively) among univariate and multivariate stability statistics, grouping of genotypes in divisive clusters and estimates (with a prediction interval) of genotype varied in management practice CT and ZT. Across locations, the genotypes “Munal” and “HD-2967” were the best performers and high stable in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2824” and “DPW-621-50”, and “Munal” may serve as diverse parents for developing high quality, climate smart, locally adapted genotypes for BR in CT and ZT, respectively. Genotypes “HD-2932”, “BAZ” and “JW-3288”, and “GW-322” and “HD-2967” are suitable for developing locally adapted stress tolerant genotypes for MP in management practices CT and ZT, respectively. Relatively small GxM and GxExM interactions in PB preclude in making definitive conclusions. |
format |
Article |
topic_facet |
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Stability Analysis GxExM BLUP Forest Plots GGE Biplot Univariate Stability Statistics WHEAT YIELD FACTORS GENETIC STABILITY STATISTICAL METHODS FIELD EXPERIMENTATION GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTOR |
author |
Jat, M.L. Jat, R.K. Singh, P. Jat, S.L. Sidhu, H.S. Jat, H.S. Bijarniya, D. Parihar, C.M. Gupta, R.K. |
author_facet |
Jat, M.L. Jat, R.K. Singh, P. Jat, S.L. Sidhu, H.S. Jat, H.S. Bijarniya, D. Parihar, C.M. Gupta, R.K. |
author_sort |
Jat, M.L. |
title |
Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
title_short |
Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
title_full |
Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
title_fullStr |
Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in India |
title_sort |
predicting yield and stability analysis of wheat under different crop management systems across agro-ecosystems in india |
publisher |
Scientific Research Publishing Inc. |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10883/19182 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jatml predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT jatrk predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT singhp predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT jatsl predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT sidhuhs predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT jaths predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT bijarniyad predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT pariharcm predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia AT guptark predictingyieldandstabilityanalysisofwheatunderdifferentcropmanagementsystemsacrossagroecosystemsinindia |
_version_ |
1758027416346820608 |