Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform

At the end of September the industry federation representing EU chocolate, biscuit and confectionary manufacturers (CAOBISCO), welcomed the Commission's communication on reform of the EU sugar regime, arguing that 'the sugar regime is long overdue for reform'. It describes the current regime as 'economically disastrous'. The fact that EU sugar users, both direct consumers and industrial consumers pay three and half times the world market price was described as 'simply unsustainable'. In contrast, the industry body representing sugar millers (CEFS), called for more attention to be given to the 'fixed quota' option when looking at options for reform. CEFS maintains that since 1968 the sugar regime has 'played an important role in ensuring sustainable and high quality sugar production and in providing employment in rural areas throughout the EU'. It argues that 'it is essential that any reform of the Sugar CMO is not carried out at the expense of the livelihoods of European and developing-country producers'. Like the Commission it sees the 'liberalisation option' as 'completely untenable'. However CEFS disagrees with the Commission's favoured 'fall in price' option, claiming it is likely to have 'irreversible adverse consequences for sugar production' in more EU regions than foreseen in the Commission analysis. It also notes that it would be liable to 'cause irreparable damage to the sugar industries of our traditional suppliers among the ACP countries'. CEFS describes the 'fall in price' option as essentially a de facto 'liberalisation' option. On this basis the CEFS strongly advocates a reassessment of the 'fixed quotas' option. Comment: The strong support for reform of COABISCO highlights the importance of sugar-sector reform to the development of the value-added food-processing industry in the EU. EU policy is increasingly focussing on this area.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
Format: News Item biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation 2003
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52839
http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/December-2003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-52839
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-528392022-11-29T17:48:00Z Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation At the end of September the industry federation representing EU chocolate, biscuit and confectionary manufacturers (CAOBISCO), welcomed the Commission's communication on reform of the EU sugar regime, arguing that 'the sugar regime is long overdue for reform'. It describes the current regime as 'economically disastrous'. The fact that EU sugar users, both direct consumers and industrial consumers pay three and half times the world market price was described as 'simply unsustainable'. In contrast, the industry body representing sugar millers (CEFS), called for more attention to be given to the 'fixed quota' option when looking at options for reform. CEFS maintains that since 1968 the sugar regime has 'played an important role in ensuring sustainable and high quality sugar production and in providing employment in rural areas throughout the EU'. It argues that 'it is essential that any reform of the Sugar CMO is not carried out at the expense of the livelihoods of European and developing-country producers'. Like the Commission it sees the 'liberalisation option' as 'completely untenable'. However CEFS disagrees with the Commission's favoured 'fall in price' option, claiming it is likely to have 'irreversible adverse consequences for sugar production' in more EU regions than foreseen in the Commission analysis. It also notes that it would be liable to 'cause irreparable damage to the sugar industries of our traditional suppliers among the ACP countries'. CEFS describes the 'fall in price' option as essentially a de facto 'liberalisation' option. On this basis the CEFS strongly advocates a reassessment of the 'fixed quotas' option. Comment: The strong support for reform of COABISCO highlights the importance of sugar-sector reform to the development of the value-added food-processing industry in the EU. EU policy is increasingly focussing on this area. At the end of September the industry federation representing... 2003 2015-01-09T14:08:20Z 2015-01-09T14:08:20Z News Item CTA. 2003. Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform. Agritrade, December 2003. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52839 http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/December-2003 en Agritrade Open Access Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation Agritrade
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
description At the end of September the industry federation representing EU chocolate, biscuit and confectionary manufacturers (CAOBISCO), welcomed the Commission's communication on reform of the EU sugar regime, arguing that 'the sugar regime is long overdue for reform'. It describes the current regime as 'economically disastrous'. The fact that EU sugar users, both direct consumers and industrial consumers pay three and half times the world market price was described as 'simply unsustainable'. In contrast, the industry body representing sugar millers (CEFS), called for more attention to be given to the 'fixed quota' option when looking at options for reform. CEFS maintains that since 1968 the sugar regime has 'played an important role in ensuring sustainable and high quality sugar production and in providing employment in rural areas throughout the EU'. It argues that 'it is essential that any reform of the Sugar CMO is not carried out at the expense of the livelihoods of European and developing-country producers'. Like the Commission it sees the 'liberalisation option' as 'completely untenable'. However CEFS disagrees with the Commission's favoured 'fall in price' option, claiming it is likely to have 'irreversible adverse consequences for sugar production' in more EU regions than foreseen in the Commission analysis. It also notes that it would be liable to 'cause irreparable damage to the sugar industries of our traditional suppliers among the ACP countries'. CEFS describes the 'fall in price' option as essentially a de facto 'liberalisation' option. On this basis the CEFS strongly advocates a reassessment of the 'fixed quotas' option. Comment: The strong support for reform of COABISCO highlights the importance of sugar-sector reform to the development of the value-added food-processing industry in the EU. EU policy is increasingly focussing on this area.
format News Item
author Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
spellingShingle Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
author_facet Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
author_sort Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
title Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
title_short Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
title_full Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
title_fullStr Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
title_full_unstemmed Divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
title_sort divergent stakeholder views on sugar-sector reform
publisher Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
publishDate 2003
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52839
http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/December-2003
work_keys_str_mv AT technicalcentreforagriculturalandruralcooperation divergentstakeholderviewsonsugarsectorreform
_version_ 1779058559101698048