Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion?
While voters in Latin America were generally very favorable to increased trade with other countries, mainly based on perceived employment gains, public opinion is affected by common pro- and anti-trade arguments. General support for trade is unaffected by consumption benefits framing but is highly sensitive downward to employment loss framing. Providing a more balanced perspective of the benefits and costs of increasing trade reduced the impact of negative framing. Framing responses are stronger in countries with high import dependence. Positive framing is more effective in contexts of rising economic sentiment. Negative framing is more effective in economies with high unemployment.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Inter-American Development Bank
|
Subjects: | International Trade, Employment Rate, Wage, Import, Job Creation, Public Opinion Poll, D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior, F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations, |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002760 https://publications.iadb.org/en/research-insights-how-do-pro-and-anti-trade-messages-affect-public-opinion |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-bid-node-29162 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-bid-node-291622023-09-12T21:46:06ZResearch Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? 2020-10-16T00:00:00+0000 http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002760 https://publications.iadb.org/en/research-insights-how-do-pro-and-anti-trade-messages-affect-public-opinion Inter-American Development Bank International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations While voters in Latin America were generally very favorable to increased trade with other countries, mainly based on perceived employment gains, public opinion is affected by common pro- and anti-trade arguments. General support for trade is unaffected by consumption benefits framing but is highly sensitive downward to employment loss framing. Providing a more balanced perspective of the benefits and costs of increasing trade reduced the impact of negative framing. Framing responses are stronger in countries with high import dependence. Positive framing is more effective in contexts of rising economic sentiment. Negative framing is more effective in economies with high unemployment. Inter-American Development Bank Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc Ernesto H. Stein Razvan Vlaicu application/pdf IDB Publications Latin America en |
institution |
BID |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Estados Unidos |
countrycode |
US |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-bid |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Norte |
libraryname |
Biblioteca Felipe Herrera del BID |
language |
English |
topic |
International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations |
spellingShingle |
International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations Inter-American Development Bank Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
description |
While voters in Latin America were generally very favorable to increased trade with other countries, mainly based on perceived employment gains, public opinion is affected by common pro- and anti-trade arguments. General support for trade is unaffected by consumption benefits framing but is highly sensitive downward to employment loss framing. Providing a more balanced perspective of the benefits and costs of increasing trade reduced the impact of negative framing. Framing responses are stronger in countries with high import dependence. Positive framing is more effective in contexts of rising economic sentiment. Negative framing is more effective in economies with high unemployment. |
author2 |
Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc |
author_facet |
Marisol Rodríguez Chatruc Inter-American Development Bank |
topic_facet |
International Trade Employment Rate Wage Import Job Creation Public Opinion Poll D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations |
author |
Inter-American Development Bank |
author_sort |
Inter-American Development Bank |
title |
Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
title_short |
Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
title_full |
Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
title_fullStr |
Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Research Insights: How Do Pro- and Anti-Trade Messages Affect Public Opinion? |
title_sort |
research insights: how do pro- and anti-trade messages affect public opinion? |
publisher |
Inter-American Development Bank |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002760 https://publications.iadb.org/en/research-insights-how-do-pro-and-anti-trade-messages-affect-public-opinion |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT interamericandevelopmentbank researchinsightshowdoproandantitrademessagesaffectpublicopinion |
_version_ |
1809108075779457024 |